I’m similar. My ‘bashing’ is influenced by him being selected 8. I don’t mind Hughes as an example and you could argue pros and cons for both. But in terms of bang for buck, Hughes is essentially a free hit. Logue at 8 seems a waste.
I think my frustrations in him are magnified by this belief he shouldn’t make the brain fades he makes if you’re a top 10 pick.
The cost to acquire is what I constantly reference in my mind when I say ‘spud’.
Not every pick turns out to be the talent they are picked at so it's still seem odd to criticise someone because of where they were drafted. Logue had no control over that either.
He's got a fair amount if upside imo as well but either way health permitting will play 150 games and be a life member of our club.