- Aug 22, 2014
- 14,017
- 51,135
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Option 1
Total money ball idea..
But on reflection would prefer an competitive #1st Ruck... I'm on the record of wanting TDK to play as a CHF #2nd Ruck
Chol - Yes, like the idea could be used as #1st or #2nd Ruck or as a KPD... From Hardwicks comments, don't think they will let him go..
Stanley - (Ducks for cover) Could be a good option for a few years whilst Mircov gets fit enough
Ratugolea - Doubt he would leave the Cats, but could be a good #2nd Ruck to team well with TDK
Option 2
Is a safe option, Callaghan will be a gun
Option 3
Yes is risky.. But could be a masterstroke..
High Possibility that all 4 would still be available..
Option 4
- Josh Ward - 2 way running inside mid with excellent skills that has high leadership qualities..
- Arlo Draper - Indigenous midfielder that can kick goals and reportedly has major X factor..
- Jye Amiss - Kicked 40 goals in 10 games, with bags of 3 x 5 and 1 x 7 goals
- Mac Andrew - High leaping Ruck/ Forward, who is equally good at ground level... Melbourne NGA prospect but can't match in top 20 picks..
Moneyball KPP
Ballenden - KPD who is behind others at the Lions and is performing well in the VFL... Comes from a very good defensive system..
Kreguer - KPD who is behind others at the Cats and is performing well in the VFL... Comes from a very good defensive system..
Riccardi - Is a swingman KPP, hasn't been great at AFL level... But has had no continuity of games either...
Talia - Could release Jones as 3rd tall interceptor for a couple of years while we develop a young KPD
Gripe
Why does everyone say that FS picks will push our picks back so they are worth less??
FS and to an extent academy picks are players that aren't available to others anyway..
Picks 3 or 6 are still the 3rd or 6th best available players anyway
Option 2 I was coming at more from the perspective of GC. They're even more limited with their selections because they need to target players who they are confident won't want to jump ship within 2 years. So if there's someone at 3 who they think will stay, but nobody else between 4 and 9, then that Pick 6 is either a kid who they probably won't keep or a kid who should have been taken even later. But if there's nobody in the top 5 on talent who they think will stick it out, then a drop from 3 to 6 may not change who they draft, and the trade then gets them a free hit at another player (ie. Setterfield) in the process. So yeah, player dependent is what I'm getting at, and I don't know enough about the kids to know which way it might lean.
Don't mind any of your Option 4 names, Ballenden and Riccardi my preferred options of those. Would like Chol ahead of all of them though.
On the Gripe. It comes up every year. The F/S academy kids are effectively "out of the pool" for other clubs, so yeah they don't change who they can take. But if you take a year like 2016 - and hypothetically say "what if McGrath and Taranto were tied to clubs through academy or F/S", then Pick 3 is getting you Setterfield or SPS. Because they weren't linked to clubs, Pick 3 secured McCluggage instead. Again though, it's all linked to the names. In 2017 the same assessment would have Pick 3 getting Cerra instead of Dow