Preview 2022 draft prospects

Remove this Banner Ad

Perfect, what a way to start the draft

I would be pleasantly stunned, Hewett (based purely off his video) is a talent worthy of a first-round pick in any draft in AFL history.
 
Agree with investing in a key defender, though I hope we pass on Hayes if there @ our first & choose a big powerful one on Van Es with preferably our 3rd pick or 4th if luck falls our way (doubtful).

Ideally Hewett gets to us with our first & we acquire a big bodied highly skilled Mid.
If not, Weddle or Barnett suit me fine with our first as realistic options and best in their categories there.

For me I'm happy to invest in Van Es with our 3rd who is the same height but is 100 Kgs or almost 20Kg's heavier than Hayes & carries this weight with ease. Hayes would be a wait a see project to get to the same weight & then how does that affect his Pace & athleticism. There are no such concerns with Van Es who tested of the charts at the national combine.
He has Hayes covered in every area athletically, finishing first in both the running & Vertical jump's (98 & 75), was 4th fastest in the 20m sprint (2.91) even @ his current weight.
The kid has a power game Hayes cannot match & is the superior one on one defender of the 2.

Hayes is rated higher based on foot skills, but Van Es is not a bad kick & can kick the ball a mile. His kicking will improve & will not be so important as he is that one on one beast who will kill the contest type backman & not that intercept run off the man tall that we already have in Moore, Dean, Murphy, Frampton & Kruger if required.
In short he fills a need for us.



Nothing wrong with his kicking in that clip.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Very comfortable with that approach to key defence. Van Es looks an excellent option if he somehow gets to 51.
51 is my dreamers scenario, with our 3rd being more realistic.
When we ontraded pick 41 to the Hawks as part of the 3 way trade, Van Es come to mind as that pick was around the mark with the Lions losing 4 picks in the thirties for Ashcroft. Sera Sera
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Hine has very specifically stated many times that he drafts for best available, and they trade for list balance. If he deems that 3 talls are the best players available he’ll draft them, it’s as simple as that.

That aside, to think that we would be carrying too many talls when we very clearly need developing KPP at both ends and in the ruck is laughable, as was your earlier statement of “if everyone is fit”, like that ever happens…

I get Hine says that and it makes complete sense but if the list is unbalanced post trade period surely we look to address that to some extent in the draft, most likely post our first 1-2 picks where it makes sense to be best available.

We can’t draft 4 key forwards if Hine decides they are best available is the extreme example. The more realistic example is our current list appears to be short at least 1 tall, Wright said as much re rucks, so Hine surely can’t choose 4 flankers and tell Fly he’ll find him a ruck end of next year.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
His action is excellent for a player his size. Was kicking noted as a flaw for Van Es?

I think it’s just deemed to be not a strength or not as good as Hayes.

That said if we had a choice at 16 or whatever it becomes of Hayes, Barnett and say Hewett I’d be skipping Hayes and taking Van Es later on as I think he looks capable.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Do you reckon we will take Weddle?, or will they go for Cowan? It could depend where we think they might fall. It's an interesting draft that seems to have us all guessing. Would be nice of one of Barnett or Keeler though
Yeah correct, he’s the other likely in the mix. Can’t help thinking Derek will prefer Hayes with his height and young age though. Hus if Derek has a hard-on about replacing pendles with a similar type, and Cowan I just think is Derek’s type also. Nice long kick, can mark, fills a need, tried to get Lachie Jones two years ago… or he may be hoping that Ryan is still there at pick 2, so goes for a genuine tall (Hayes, Barnett) or mid (Hus, Hewett) first
 
Last edited:
I get Hine says that and it makes complete sense but if the list is unbalanced post trade period surely we look to address that to some extent in the draft, most likely post our first 1-2 picks where it makes sense to be best available.

We can’t draft 4 key forwards if Hine decides they are best available is the extreme example. The more realistic example is our current list appears to be short at least 1 tall, Wright said as much re rucks, so Hine surely can’t choose 4 flankers and tell Fly he’ll find him a ruck end of next year.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I would imagine that the whole recruiting team would involved in the process. Hine will probably get the last say but there would be influence of some sort, from the coach and list manager. It's highly unlikely that we take 4 talls but in the process of identifying talent, especially in the last 12 months, there would be other influences that help shape Hines decisions. Then again, I could be completely off track, lol. Either way, I hope we at least get 1 of Barnett and Keeler
 
I hope we take the first three picks, hoping for a Weddle, Keeler and who ever else is available at 27. Leave that last spot for a train on like Narkle. Narkle is 24 and if the developing mids aren’t ready I feel like he is a pretty good option.
Side note on Keeler, when he gets a bit of size on him and is in the system he gives me Ugle Hagen vibes.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hopefully we take a couple of talls but a lot of people are saying we might not even take one. Who knows but I agree with you. PS: I think Frampton will play regular seniors, I can't see the point of a 3 year contract if he's only depth
I think Frampton will be playing in the one,s not much doubt about that as you rightly say why do a 3 yr contract otherwise.

For me I would pick in order

1.) Hayes or if we were lucky Buss.
2.) Barnett or Keeler or Lemmey,I just do not want Richmond to get Scully and Lemmey,(that seems to be the mail).
3.) George or Ryan who would be okay but not at our 1st pick.
4.) Knobel if we not get Barnett,Dowling or Majot would do me fine .2talls 2 mids.
 
I think Frampton will be playing in the one,s not much doubt about that as you rightly say why do a 3 yr contract otherwise.

For me I would pick in order

1.) Hayes or if we were lucky Buss.
2.) Barnett or Keeler or Lemmey,I just do not want Richmond to get Scully and Lemmey,(that seems to be the mail).
3.) George or Ryan who would be okay but not at our 1st pick.
4.) Knobel if we not get Barnett,Dowling or Majot would do me fine .2talls 2 mids.
That's a big fat yes from me
 
Very comfortable with that approach to key defence. Van Es looks an excellent option if he somehow gets to 51.
I thought Van Ess would be slow and sluggish but really he carries that weight well,I would not mind him at all I think I like him better than Weddle really.
 
I think it’s just deemed to be not a strength or not as good as Hayes.

That said if we had a choice at 16 or whatever it becomes of Hayes, Barnett and say Hewett I’d be skipping Hayes and taking Van Es later on as I think he looks capable.
Almost word for word :thumbsu:
 
His action is excellent for a player his size. Was kicking noted as a flaw for Van Es?
Not to my knowledge, neither a strength nor weakness as a low possession defender.
I was simply comparing Hayes Vrs Van Es & as I said he's not a bad kick, maybe I should have written he's "reliable by foot" as copied from Rookie central.
It was never intended as a blight on his kicking just an unbiased comparison between the 2 players
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview 2022 draft prospects

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top