I'm no medical person at all, so I'm asking this question with no preconception either way. When you do an ACL and you get all the surgery and the rehab etc etc, does this make you more/less/equally likely to do it again in the future? I think about David Schwarz back in the 90's going down like 3 times in quick succession, but I think with the benefit of hindsight people now say he came back too soon each time?
I recall hearing that when blokes start doing hammies they become more likely to do them in future. On the other hand I broke my femur (thigh bone) clean in half about 10 years ago, so they opened me up, put a massive titanium rod right down the bone and now it's literally unbreakable!
Anyone got any insight either way on this?
The ligament itself will be stronger. This is because they use a thicker tendon from the patella, hamstrings or quadriceps to replace the initial ACL. So the new ACL will be able to handle more load than a native acl. Then again, the factors that made Cam susceptible to an ACL like his biomechanics and alignment will likely persist so he will always be at risk. I see Hipwood as less likely to do his again as his was more due to trauma and getting his leg twisted whereas Cams was more innocuous twisting motion.
I am not an orthopod though so others will probably know better