List Mgmt. 2022 Trade and Free Agency Thread

[Jivlain]

 

[Tom14]

In my dreams we could get hold of De Goey.

He's irredeemable and an immense talent.

St Kilda love throwing money at players like that and then having no infrastructure to rehabilitate them.

The Pies are desperate for SC relief. That's cool get rid of your second best player.

Fixed that for you

As I’ve said clearly before I’m a big no on de goey. Suits St Kilda to a tee.

 

[martinson]

Fixed that for you

As I’ve said clearly before I’m a big no on de goey. Suits St Kilda to a tee.

Well there's no hope for us because we can't fit him in.

I don't know whether De Goey will ever be any good for anyone else . Clearly the Pies have doubts and other pressures as well.

I'd be taking the punt myself if I could . If the DD stacked up.

 

[Tom14]

Well there's no hope for us because we can't fit him in.

I don't know whether De Goey will ever be any good for anyone else . Clearly the Pies have doubts and other pressures as well.

I'd be taking the punt myself if I could . If the DD stacked up.

If you were going to smartly take the punt on him as a club for the reported $ and years I think you’d want the sort of good behaviour clauses he has apparently rejected from Collingwood.

Anyway, moot point as I doubt we have the money for him and Dunkley.

 

[Morbidly_Obese]

essendon board licking their lips

They want cox?

 

[Daniels Riches]

Where's Daniels Riches when you need him....

I’ve got nothing sorry mate! Will keep the ears open though ️


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[dlanod]

I will now consult our resident free agency nerd dlanod.

Do clubs have to match the years and $$$, or do they have the match the contract exactly?

Same contract.

 

[BRAB]

Same contract.

You never let me down. Thanks

 

[JasRulz63]

Given Collingwood's propensity to discard players well before their long term contracts have ended, I wouldn't want any vague behavioural clauses in any contracts I sign with them either.

 

[martinson]

If you were going to smartly take the punt on him as a club for the reported $ and years I think you’d want the sort of good behaviour clauses he has apparently rejected from Collingwood.

Anyway, moot point as I doubt we have the money for him and Dunkley.

The only thing we can take from that is that someone else is prepared to offer him equal or more without the clauses.

 

[Sausages]

Same contract.

Is that like the same?

Or can it be same-same?

 

[JB42]

Not to mention their players got stay in their own beds for most of the season as all Vic clubs do. Interstate teams in that era were literally away from home 50% of the season ( well Sydney and Brisbane )

Collingwood paid more in TPP in both years we beat them due to veterans list loopholes. Burns and Buckley had a large proportion of their salaries not included in the salary cap.

 

[bungalow_bill]

Given Collingwood's propensity to discard players well before their long term contracts have ended, I wouldn't want any vague behavioural clauses in any contracts I sign with them either.

Good point.

 

[Lazza16]

The only thing we can take from that is that someone else is prepared to offer him equal or more without the clauses.

I know nothing but recall Bombres being interested in him last contract. They could do with a big name and his Dad played for them.

 

[haystark]

Rumours on Trade Radio that the Giants are looking to move Nick Haynes

19

Nick Haynes

Age

32

Ht

192cm

Wt

88kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

16.4

4star

K

11.4

4star

HB

4.9

4star

M

6.2

5star

T

1.6

4star

MG

326.8

4star

D

17.4

4star

K

13.9

5star

HB

3.5

2star

M

8.0

5star

T

1.5

2star

MG

326.8

5star

D

7.8

2star

K

4.4

2star

HB

3.4

3star

M

2.4

3star

T

2.2

4star

on. I have always rated him. How would he go in our backline?

He’s being paid handsomely, but suggested Giants will pay some of his salary.

 

[Nathan Barley]

Rumours on Trade Radio that the Giants are looking to move Nick Haynes on. I have always rated him. How would he go in our backline?

He’s being paid handsomely, but suggested Giants will pay some of his salary.

Would be a huge get

 

[dlanod]

Is that like the same?

Or can it be same-same?

Same-same but different

 

[dlanod]

Rumours on Trade Radio that the Giants are looking to move Nick Haynes on. I have always rated him. How would he go in our backline?

He’s being paid handsomely, but suggested Giants will pay some of his salary.

He'd be a good addition but not sure how we'd bring him in given our current commitments.

 

[Thomasno]

He'd be a good addition but not sure how we'd bring him in given our current commitments.

I’d imagine it would only happen if Gardiner goes

 

[haystark]

He'd be a good addition but not sure how we'd bring him in given our current commitments.

Is Gardiner staying?

 

[dlanod]

I’d imagine it would only happen if Gardiner goes

Is Gardiner staying?

I was more thinking about what we could offer in trade - even if Gardiner goes, I don't see him generating much in the way of a return.

 

[Sproj]

I was more thinking about what we could offer in trade - even if Gardiner goes, I don't see him generating much in the way of a return.

Gardiner is an established first team defender and is effectively in his prime. He should generate something.

I feel like we undervalue our players at times.

 

[Nuggo]

If clubs are salary dumping then you don't need to offer them much.

 

[briztoon]

Gardiner is an established first team defender and is effectively in his prime. He should generate something.

I feel like we undervalue our players at times.

I’d be genuinely shocked if he received an offer that got us better than band 4 compensation.

 

[dlanod]

Gardiner is an established first team defender and is effectively in his prime. He should generate something.

I feel like we undervalue our players at times.

He would generate something, but if he was getting a contract anything like McStay (which probably only gets us Band 3 anyway) it would've been making news by now. An established first team defender in his prime means nothing to the compensation formula.

 

[Lazza16]

I originally thought Dogs might be interested in Darcy but just read they are into Tomlinson and have already got Jones coming. Pies could be a bit thin down back.