Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,399
- 88,001
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Thanks for making this an awesome trade period peeps. Will be locking this thread later tonight
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Benning?Maybe the club has faith Kuek will be our depth ruckman?
True! Forgot about him. Hope he re-finds some form for his sake after that year off. Can't see them kicking a winning score with Allen and Darling though. How are they planning to win any ball in the middle?Allen?
Need:
Small forward
Key forward
Key defender
Draper / Scaife could be NGA key forward options… Scaife seems to be most likely from reports?
Feel comfy with most of the rest of the list
Also want Allan
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hope Naitanui doesn't accidentally eat the ball?True! Forgot about him. Hope he re-finds some form for his sake after that year off. Can't see them kicking a winning score with Allen and Darling though. How are they planning to win any ball in the middle?
“Injury”Jed Hagan has missed out on the combine due to injury..
Corbett is in the best 22. He's better than Sturt, Banfield and the departed Logue up forward. We just shipped out two starting forwards, the imports have to fill those holes.Calmed down a bit now, melted a bit hard back there (don't we all though at some point?)
I'm happy to give it a chance. If O'Meara can bring something to us I'll be ecstatic, he's a good stop gap for the loss of Mundy.
If Corbett is anything more than depth we'll be well pleased.
Jackson will be one of the best players in the league down the line, can't complain about it.
We’ll pick one up late in the draft.Maybe the club has faith Kuek will be our depth ruckman?
I can imagine it now:Corbett is in the best 22. He's better than Sturt, Banfield and the departed Logue up forward. We just shipped out two starting forwards, the imports have to fill those holes.
Our Talls will be Tabs, Amiss and Corbett. Corbett may start on bench to allow Jackson to start on the ground though, Jackson may be in the middle though!
People thinking north will just be crap again in 2022 might be surprised.We have three picks tied to North for 2023, we want WC (and all other teams) to do better than North. Despite using our 2023 1st rounder we have a good hand for the following draft for the first time in ages.
On Friday evening the hierarchy at Fremantle made a decision to meet Melb demands to ensure "clear water" for Lobb move, which will get done in the coming days.
The line had been drawn at 2 first rounders, but the additional F2 was demanded by Melb, we folded our hand Friday.
Who cares ?True! Forgot about him. Hope he re-finds some form for his sake after that year off. Can't see them kicking a winning score with Allen and Darling though. How are they planning to win any ball in the middle?
Possibly but not having a coach and losing your arguably best young talent in the same year is unprecedented also.People thinking north will just be crap again in 2022 might be surprised.
Chances of a team winning 3 spoons in a row is almost unprecedented.
I can see them rise to about 14th or 15th.
They are stacked with young talent
Reflecting, JOM seems like a slightly strange list management pivot at the last minute?
Not negative on it, but what's opinion on whether;
1. It was probably in play from much further out than was public
2. We would've held one (or more) of lobb and meek if JOM didnt come up (albeit still a strange pivot to get an inside mid)
3. We were moving both lobb and meek but thought JOM represented better value than Sharp given the way negotiations were tracking with GC
I have this weird view he could be a game-changing mid or winger. Would be impossible to match up on.We’ll pick one up late in the draft.
If I’m honest I see Kuek developing as a defender, I don’t see any forward craft in him apart from his athleticism.
We were very young in the middle if we hadn't picked up JOM.Reflecting, JOM seems like a slightly strange list management pivot at the last minute?
Not negative on it, but what's opinion on whether;
1. It was probably in play from much further out than was public
2. We would've held one (or more) of lobb and meek if JOM didnt come up (albeit still a strange pivot to get an inside mid)
3. We were moving both lobb and meek but thought JOM represented better value than Sharp given the way negotiations were tracking with GC
We chased O'Meara last year apparently, which got reanimated by the Haks entertaining GWS' pursuit this week.Reflecting, JOM seems like a slightly strange list management pivot at the last minute?
Not negative on it, but what's opinion on whether;
1. It was probably in play from much further out than was public
2. We would've held one (or more) of lobb and meek if JOM didnt come up (albeit still a strange pivot to get an inside mid)
3. We were moving both lobb and meek but thought JOM represented better value than Sharp given the way negotiations were tracking with GC
Objectively **** list management?Fair enough to you man, but I don't know how you can back the club in when this is objectively s**t list management.