Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,426
- 88,104
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Thanks for making this an awesome trade period peeps. Will be locking this thread later tonight
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it’s most likely the latter, and no surprise. Journos full of shit.Good point, and now I think about it, the whole JHF thing makes the media reports the last couple of weeks really odd. Either JHF only just changed his mind or the pick 8 thing with Port and them going after Pickett was always a complete load of crap.
Its not an option you two, are you mad?! He's not Luke Ball.Have to admit I was wondering this too as a backup option; we keep our first pick (13) to do it that we are clearly fine in giving away for such an endeavour and he puts a price on his head - it would be pretty unpalatable for the other clubs to spend an early pick on someone that has run away and costs a bit you would think.
and why would Port give up butters who is a far better player?If I was North I'd ask for pick 8 & Zak Butters
and why would Port give up butters who is a far better player?
Yeah. Also I seriously doubt Butters would want to leave.and why would Port give up butters who is a far better player?
JHF might not quite have the eye of tiger sufficient to be the next Michael Voss but he's going to be a top 10 inside mid in the comp minimum. The idea Butter is better is.. not right.and why would Port give up butters who is a far better player?
No-one is going to challenge the legality of the draft because they're not f#cking morons.Having players leave after only one year isn't good for the league. Surely, they have to think about extending the initial contract for draftees.
It's not going to be long before someone challenges the legality of the draft.
whats extending the contract gonna doHaving players leave after only one year isn't good for the league. Surely, they have to think about extending the initial contract for draftees.
It's not going to be long before someone challenges the legality of the draft.
whats extending the contract gonna do
He has a contract next year anyway, they don't have to trade him already
He turns it over too much at WAFL level to be rated exquisiteI think exquisite foot skills overstates it a lot.
I find his kicks limited enough, they float through the air and take an age to reach their target.
Meat and drink for good AFL defenders.
He’s got to improve that aspect big time I feel.
Alright folks, it's time for me to go enjoy my Rheem before retiring for a good night's shut-eye. We've got a long, hard road ahead of us tomorrow. The type only a Continental 245/45 R 18 PremiumContact can navigate.
If this happened wouldn't we end up with two superpowered WA teams as they'd be stocked with WA only talent?No-one is going to challenge the legality of the draft because they're not f#cking morons.
Or the gun WA players will be offered way overs to stay interstate and the locals there take unders to stay close to their parents and girlfriends.If this happened wouldn't we end up with two superpowered WA teams as they'd be stocked with WA only talent?
I agree. But I would go further: I would say the trade is on for Butters and Marshall. No picks needed.If I was North I'd ask for pick 8 & Zak Butters
JHF might not quite have the eye of tiger sufficient to be the next Michael Voss but he's going to be a top 10 inside mid in the comp minimum. The idea Butter is better is.. not right.
No current season stats available
You would be crazyI agree. But I would go further: I would say the trade is on for Butters and Marshall. No picks needed.
More than anything else North need guys who are ready to play now.