The_General#1
Team Captain
- Jun 18, 2023
- 477
- 583
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
It wasn’t Banger man.Cmon man, it was a simple copy and paste error that anyone could have done
No need to single out PMBangers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wasn’t Banger man.Cmon man, it was a simple copy and paste error that anyone could have done
No need to single out PMBangers
That’s exactly how Mahony was draftedHow was I supposed to know Harley Reid's place was taking by two children in a trench coat
I wad speaking to a bloke who watches a fair bit of junior footy and he has concerns with Duursma's hardness. Any of our blokes counter this?
He isn’t the hardest player in the draft, in that he can be a bit selective as to how much commitment he has when the ball is in dispute on the ground.
Aerially though, he is very courageous, often flying for marks across packs and going back with the flight.
He isn’t on the Stephenson or Polec levels of softness, but he’s no Ziebell either.
Yes but we'll never have a opportunity to solve some of those holes when we have 2 x top 5 and 3x top 20 picks especially when there are 4 players who are or have been, the top 4 outstanding players all year (taking Reid & Walter out) which aren't all midfielders.We're still a couple of years away from having a balanced list.
This means we don't need to be in a rush to solve all the holes this draft / trade period.
Drafting for needs today will make us better next year and this may be important to getting positive development from across the group next and even help us sell trading in some new blokes from other teams.
However, if we draft in best available we may end up with a higher ceiling / more talented playing list - especially noting that in the coming years we won't have as much access to the top end.
When you look at GWS their high end draft picks have meant that not only do they get great players on the list to build towards success but when players get shifted out opposition teams are paying more than a third rounder for them. I think this will allow us to trade for players and draft for players in the coming years with more flexibility than we have previously had.
It's probably fair to say Sheez wasn't the hardest either I think you'll agree. Feels like Duursma is a very similar prospect.
A conversation has occurred. I’m just bloody nervous it may be with the intention of handing over 8 + one of our first two.
If it takes two teen picks to get to 8, then 8 and 2 or 3 to get to 1, then its just extra steps of 2 or 3 plus two teen picks for 1.Really? I imagine that would be to trade up to pick 1. I could live with that.
Sounds like two late teens picks didn't get much traction according to Twomey so it's probably going to take a very high price of three teens picks or two teens picks and a F2 or something ridiculous to get pick 7/8 that I'm not sure it's worth paying unless you know who you are getting at the pick. I think GWS won't trade if O'Sullivan is on the board, just makes too much sense for them to take an Albury kid who will likely stay long term at the club. Cats I'm not sure trade it either, they shouldn't pass up on a top 10 talent imo.If it takes two teen picks to get to 8, then 8 and 2 or 3 to get to 1, then its just extra steps of 2 or 3 plus two teen picks for 1.
Personally id keep 8 and takes 2, 3, 8, teen pick left over to the draft.
Happens every year. Funnily enough it has been sparked by a couple list managers comments to the media. Not surprisingly they have all have agendas…I don’t think the draft is as shallow as people are making out.
Don’t need aza another cat .. no thanksHe isn’t the hardest player in the draft, in that he can be a bit selective as to how much commitment he has when the ball is in dispute on the ground.
Aerially though, he is very courageous, often flying for marks across packs and going back with the flight.
He isn’t on the Stephenson or Polec levels of softness, but he’s no Ziebell either.
If it takes two teen picks to get to 8, then 8 and 2 or 3 to get to 1, then its just extra steps of 2 or 3 plus two teen picks for 1.
Personally id keep 8 and takes 2, 3, 8, teen pick left over to the draft.
Sounds like two late teens picks didn't get much traction according to Twomey so it's probably going to take a very high price of three teens picks or two teens picks and a F2 or something ridiculous to get pick 7/8 that I'm not sure it's worth paying unless you know who you are getting at the pick. I think GWS won't trade if O'Sullivan is on the board, just makes too much sense for them to take an Albury kid who will likely stay long term at the club. Cats I'm not sure trade it either, they shouldn't pass up on a top 10 talent imo.
It’s a great effort and from what I’ve heard (ex Tasmanian here and have some friends who coach within the state squad), next years u18 crop are even better, not 100% sure on specific players going high in the draft but as a squad/team equally as talented if not more so then this years and last years whom both finished in a prelim in the TAC cup. Obviously with the Allies winning the overall carnival this year, those division 2 teams must really be having some sort of purple patch, it’s good to see.Tasmania should be really proud of having three out of the top ten picked.
Oh, well, then yea absolutely do not do that deal with anyone. Just stroll into the draft and see who gets desperate for 17/18 on the night.Sounds like two late teens picks didn't get much traction according to Twomey so it's probably going to take a very high price of three teens picks or two teens picks and a F2 or something ridiculous to get pick 7/8 that I'm not sure it's worth paying unless you know who you are getting at the pick. I think GWS won't trade if O'Sullivan is on the board, just makes too much sense for them to take an Albury kid who will likely stay long term at the club. Cats I'm not sure trade it either, they shouldn't pass up on a top 10 talent imo.
If it takes two teen picks to get to 8, then 8 and 2 or 3 to get to 1, then its just extra steps of 2 or 3 plus two teen picks for 1.
Personally id keep 8 and takes 2, 3, 8, teen pick left over to the draft.
I wouldn't hate that either, in fact looking at a bunch of different scenarios on how this plays out there's quite a few that i see as good.Fair enough. That would also be a good outcome, but I’d rather pick 1 & 2 or 3. Reid and McKercher/Duursma.
Good chance he's there for our pick 15 or even 17 & 18 if GWS pass on him.You’d find it pretty hard to find a more impressive highlights package than Collard for a small forward.
Genuine pace
Genuine xfactor
Genuine team first forward line craft
Unless he’s said im heading home in 3 years, we’d have to take him
We should 100% be going after him with one of our picks in the teens. Then grab the best defender and forward available. Rookie/Cat B ruck to finish off the sideGood chance he's there for our pick 15 or even 17 & 18 if GWS pass on him.
Murphy, Collard, C.Edwards, A.Reid, DeMattia all around the mark for picks 15 17 & 18, plus Dawson the smokey to fill a hole. Interesting intell about us overlooking Schoenmaker for Dawson? Probably earmarked WC pick 23 for Dawson in our last offer for Reid?