Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Tell me what makes him better?
He has had 1 AFL standard season and is 3 years older than Kozi
His stats are almost identical to Kozi
His work rate and effort is often questioned and ha been at 2 separate clubs
So tell me what makes him a clearly better player?
Richmond are also offering Kosi 3 years.Clearly Hawks list management do, offered Kosi a stop gap 1 year minimal contract. Offered Chlo a 3[+1] year bigger contract
A lot of the BF hawks wanted Kosi delisted.
Richmond are also offering Kosi 3 years.
they simply wont do that unless it is ridiculous asking prices which industry wide they think the Chol price is about right due to the contract that was offered. If Hawthorn cant spin it that it is on the other team they wont walk as they dont want to sour relationships with player agents that have had their player publicly name Hawthorn as their team of choice.Very comfortable walking away from Massimo and Chol if a good deal cannot be agreed. We should not be overpaying for average players.
We also revised Kosi’s deal and tried to keep him.Clearly Hawks list management do, offered Kosi a stop gap 1 year minimal contract. Offered Chlo a 3[+1] year bigger contract
A lot of the BF hawks wanted Kosi delisted.
What does that matter? Player value is subjective. We clearly value the ruck half of the ruck/forward, Richmond value the forward half. As someone else said on this thread, just because you've got a new car it doesn't mean you won't try to get maximum value for the old one you don't need anymore.Clearly Hawks list management do, offered Kosi a stop gap 1 year minimal contract. Offered Chlo a 3[+1] year bigger contract
A lot of the BF hawks wanted Kosi delisted.
He had an existing contract of 2 years we have added another two to entice to come over. with a 3rd year performance basedClearly Hawks list management do, offered Kosi a stop gap 1 year minimal contract. Offered Chlo a 3[+1] year bigger contract
A lot of the BF hawks wanted Kosi delisted.
And it is irrelevant, tell me what makes him a better player. What does he do clearly better.Hence my comment about Hawks list management.
What does that matter? Player value is subjective. We clearly value the ruck half of the ruck/forward, Richmond value the forward half. As someone else said on this thread, just because you've got a new car it doesn't mean you won't try to get maximum value for the old one you don't need anymore.
And it is irrelevant, tell me what makes him a better player. What does he do clearly better.
Community notes:
Sounds simple doesn't it? By why in the hell should we pay the same for Chol? GC want to get rid of him. Would want a couple of extra bid matching picks thrown in.
Contract lengths are usually longer when you try to lure a player from another club. Chol 3 years vs Kosi 1 or 2 is irrelevant in terms of measuring their worth.
So can you offer up anything on the two players or not?I think the view of Hawks List Managemnt is very relevant to who is the better player.
I'm somewhat surprised that we haven't made a play for Billings.
Would cost next to nothing from a trade perspective, and with Wingard out for most the year, Brockman now gone and some genuine question marks over the likes of Butler, I think he would be a good fit as a small forward/half forward depth option.