Analysis 2024 AFL Draft General Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Reader mode
Some 20m results that may not be final

Top 5 in 20m

Gabriel Stumpf 2.815
Leo Lombard 2.851
Rhys Unwin 2.914
Jasper Alger 2.931
Malakai Champion 2.938

Top 5 Worst
Noah Mraz 3.258
Alex Dodson 3.248
Logan Smith 3.247
Harvey Langford 3.240
Eoin McEvoy 3.240


State combine

Top 5
Lennox Hofmann 2.861
Blake Leidler 2.887
Jayden Nguyen 2.887
Oliver Hannaford 2.954
Mitch Kirkwood-Scott 2.969

Top 5 Worst
Jordan Doherty 3.287
Oliver Dean 3.277
Luke Quaynor 3.267
Charlie Orchard 3.213
Nathaniel Sulzberger 3.212
 
eaglevision said:
Final testing today so thought I’d do a Top 30 phantom draft after reported trades. It’s impossible to place GCS later picks with a team but they will probably sell them off so just went with best available. Some picks are with intel, but most are just speculation.
  1. RICH Jagga Smith
  2. NM Sam Lalor
  3. WCE Finn O’Sullivan
  4. ADEL Sid Draper
  5. MELB Harvey Langford
  6. RICH Murphy Reid
  7. STK Josh Smillie
  8. STK Tobie Travaglia
  9. ESS Jobe Shanahan
  10. RICH Harry Armstrong
  11. FREO Jo Berry
  12. CARL Luke Trainor
  13. PORT Alix Tauru
  14. WCE Xavier Lindsay
  15. GWS Bo Allan
  16. GWS Cooper Hynes
  17. WBD Oliver Hannaford
  18. RICH Taj Hotton
  19. SYD Jack Whitlock
  20. RICH Alex Dodson
  21. GWS Tom Gross
  22. SYD Matt Whitlock
  23. GCS Jonty Faull
  24. RICH Harry O’Farrell
  25. NM Thomas Sims
  26. WCE Harrison Oliver
  27. STK Harry O’Farrell
  28. MELB Christian Moraes
  29. GCS James Barrat
  30. FREO Jesse Dattoli
Click to expand...
2 x O’Farrells
 

Log in to remove this ad.

eDPS said:
Some 20m results that may not be final

Top 5 in 20m

Gabriel Stumpf 2.815
Leo Lombard 2.851
Rhys Unwin 2.914
Jasper Alger 2.931
Malakai Champion 2.938

Top 5 Worst
Noah Mraz 3.258
Alex Dodson 3.248
Logan Smith 3.247
Harvey Langford 3.240
Eoin McEvoy 3.240


State combine

Top 5
Lennox Hofmann 2.861
Blake Leidler 2.887
Jayden Nguyen 2.887
Oliver Hannaford 2.954
Mitch Kirkwood-Scott 2.969

Top 5 Worst
Jordan Doherty 3.287
Oliver Dean 3.277
Luke Quaynor 3.267
Charlie Orchard 3.213
Nathaniel Sulzberger 3.212
Click to expand...
Gee whiz Harvey Langford.
 
eDPS said:
Some 20m results that may not be final

Top 5 in 20m

Gabriel Stumpf 2.815
Leo Lombard 2.851
Rhys Unwin 2.914
Jasper Alger 2.931
Malakai Champion 2.938

Top 5 Worst
Noah Mraz 3.258
Alex Dodson 3.248
Logan Smith 3.247
Harvey Langford 3.240
Eoin McEvoy 3.240


State combine

Top 5
Lennox Hofmann 2.861
Blake Leidler 2.887
Jayden Nguyen 2.887
Oliver Hannaford 2.954
Mitch Kirkwood-Scott 2.969

Top 5 Worst
Jordan Doherty 3.287
Oliver Dean 3.277
Luke Quaynor 3.267
Charlie Orchard 3.213
Nathaniel Sulzberger 3.212
Click to expand...
Any idea what the flying Vikings 20m and agility was pls? Oh and Riley Bice as well pls.
 
Last edited:
eDPS said:
Some 20m results that may not be final

Top 5 in 20m

Gabriel Stumpf 2.815
Leo Lombard 2.851
Rhys Unwin 2.914
Jasper Alger 2.931
Malakai Champion 2.938

Top 5 Worst
Noah Mraz 3.258
Alex Dodson 3.248
Logan Smith 3.247
Harvey Langford 3.240
Eoin McEvoy 3.240


State combine

Top 5
Lennox Hofmann 2.861
Blake Leidler 2.887
Jayden Nguyen 2.887
Oliver Hannaford 2.954
Mitch Kirkwood-Scott 2.969

Top 5 Worst
Jordan Doherty 3.287
Oliver Dean 3.277
Luke Quaynor 3.267
Charlie Orchard 3.213
Nathaniel Sulzberger 3.212
Click to expand...

Hold up, how the hell is Hannaford not at the national?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yoda_ said:
talking on the Essendon board, apparently dual Brownlow medalist Patrick Cripps had a very poor 20m sprint time. It happens

if you can football, you can football
Click to expand...
Cripps is a handball first in and under ball winner. He really has no need for a good 20m sprint compared to Langford who needs to create space to maximize his damaging ball use by foot.

I don't think the comparison has much merit.
 
WalshistheGOAT said:
Cripps is a handball first in and under ball winner. He really has no need for a good 20m sprint compared to Langford who needs to create space to maximize his damaging ball use by foot.

I don't think the comparison has much merit.
Click to expand...
wasn't a comparison at all

re read what I posted
 
Yoda_ said:
wasn't a comparison at all

re read what I posted
Click to expand...
I did, and I'll say again... Cripps combine results held almost no bearing to his ability to play as he does most of gis best work at low speed pushing blokes around at the coal face to get his hands on the ball first.

Langfords combine results highlight a concern for a player that does most of their damage by foot outside the contest. It's like a KPP coming back with a horrendous vertical leap... It's sort of crucial to their role at AFL level.

Just my opinion on the matter.
 
WalshistheGOAT said:
I did, and I'll say again... Cripps combine results held almost no bearing to his ability to play as he does most of gis best work at low speed pushing blokes around at the coal face to get his hands on the ball first.

Langfords combine results highlight a concern for a player that does most of their damage by foot outside the contest. It's like a KPP coming back with a horrendous vertical leap... It's sort of crucial to their role at AFL level.

Just my opinion on the matter.
Click to expand...
(I will apologise, I shouldn't have been a dick with my previous comment)


I was referring to Langford being good at football. Even if he is not explosive, he can still have size and ability to find it, he should find a role at he top level. Whether his lack of explosiveness restricts him from being a top liner or not, id be comfortable he will play 150 AFL games (barring injuries of course)
 
Not a big fan of the "if you can football you can football" argument. There are often kids who are excellent juniors who struggle at AFL level due to lack of foot speed. Only have to look back one year to George Stevens.

Not saying he won't make it or anything like that, but to me it clearly makes Langford a riskier pick.
 
noobermensch said:
Not a big fan of the "if you can football you can football" argument. There are often kids who are excellent juniors who struggle at AFL level due to lack of foot speed. Only have to look back one year to George Stevens.

Not saying he won't make it or anything like that, but to me it clearly makes Langford a riskier pick.
Click to expand...
Agreed Noober, only have to look at the Blues snail paced midfield to see what happens when you put too many one paced plodders together in the current era of AFL. Hence why we're looking to trade 1 or 2 of them this off season.

Athletic traits are a huge factor in the modern game.
 
Reader mode

Remove this Banner Ad

Analysis 2024 AFL Draft General Discussion

Similar threads

PMBangers
Draft Expert PMBangers 2024 Draft Thread and psuedo general draft discussion apparently
17 18 19 20 21
Replies
523
Views
79K
Yoda_
Yoda_
eDPS
Phantom Draft eDPS Rankings & Draft Discussion 2024
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
156
Views
31K
manureid
manureid
RedmanWasHere
  • Locked
Under Age 2033 AFL Draft General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
824
Ticky009
Ticky009
RedmanWasHere
  • Locked
Under Age 2031 AFL Draft General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
534
Ticky009
Ticky009
RedmanWasHere
  • Locked
Under Age 2030 AFL Draft General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
888
Ticky009
Ticky009
RedmanWasHere
  • Locked
Under Age 2029 AFL Draft General Discussion.
Replies
2
Views
2K
Ticky009
Ticky009
Michaels
Phantom Draft AFL 2024 1st Round Mock Draft - No trades or Bids, from the Tigercast crew.
Replies
2
Views
1K
RUNVS
RUNVS

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top