List Mgmt. 2024 AFL Draft - November 20-21 (Picks 13, 29, 36, 50, 94, 112, 130)

[Ford Fairlane]

Thanks to Lore for this great resource

 

[RossFC]

AFL DRAFT: Full list of nominees as of Nov 7

Tom Clurey, Jack Hayes and Kaine Baldwin are just three of many delisted players to nominate for November's Telstra AFL Draft

www.afl.com.au

Notable draft nominations:
Benny Barrett (PAFC NGA/South Adelaide)
Rome Burgoyne (WWT Eagles)
Ky Burgoyne (West Adelaide)
Tom Clurey (Delisted Port Adelaide AFL)
Tom Cochrane (Centrals)
Preston Cockatoo-Collins (Port Adelaide SANFL)
Kade Dittmar (Centrals)
Jed Hagan (East Fremantle)
Oliver Francou (Port Adelaide SANFL)
Will Francou (North Adelaide)
Austin Harris (Port Adelaide SANFL)
Elliot Mahoney (St Kevins OB VAFA)
Jez McLennan (Port Adelaide SANFL)
Louie Montgomery (Glenunga)
Cody Szust (Port Adelaide SANFL)
Jack Watkins (North Melbourne VFL/Port Adelaide train-on player)
Boyd Woodcock (Southport VFL)

Final list of nominees for the 2024 Telstra AFL Draft

Check out the full list of 1044 nominees for the 2024 Telstra AFL Draft

www.afl.com.au

Added:
Riley Bonner (Delisted St Kilda)
Francis Evans (Delisted Port Adelaide)
Marty Frederick (Sturt)
Joel Garner (Richmond VFL)
Kyle Marshall (McLaren)
Tom McCallum (Delisted Port Adelaide)
Will O'Brien (Port Adelaide SANFL)
Tom Scully (West Adelaide)

 

[Ford Fairlane]

So by this time next week we should be halfway to knowing who we will be picking at 13.

 

[Shaucob_Burjan]

Final list of nominees for the 2024 Telstra AFL Draft

Check out the full list of 1044 nominees for the 2024 Telstra AFL Draft

www.afl.com.au

Added:
Riley Bonner (Delisted St Kilda)
Francis Evans (Delisted Port Adelaide)
Marty Frederick (Sturt)
Joel Garner (Richmond VFL)
Kyle Marshall (McLaren)
Tom McCallum (Delisted Port Adelaide)
Will O'Brien (Port Adelaide SANFL)
Tom Scully (West Adelaide)

Narkle didn't nominate?

 

[Shaucob_Burjan]

No issues with drafting Shanahan, even at 13. However, if it's a choice between him, Reid or Travaglia, I'd still be going with one of the other two.

Big baller move would be to split 13 and use one of the picks on Shanahan

i.e. 13 to Sydney for 19 and 22 taking Shanahan and Hotton

 

[avs]

Twomey considers Reid a potential slider

Where does he go? St Kilda and Melbourne will look at him later in the top-10, while Richmond (No.10 and 11), West Coast (No.12), Port Adelaide (No.13) and Fremantle (No.14) have also shown interest in Reid. There's a chance he is available deeper in the teens as far as the Western Bulldogs' pick No.17.

The kid is an absolute gun . We should not miss him at our pick . It seems like he would be playing footy from 1st round next year .

 

[Revan11]

The Whitlocks look like they'll need time and then may not even make it. Skinny talls that lack body strength don't usually make it in the AFL. Hipwood and Max King are OK but someone a tad shorter with more intensity like Shanahan is preferrable. Having said all this I think our need for a tall is more in the backline. Aliir is 30, BZT is more a lockdown defender and Ratugolea has not settled into a KD. Beyond those 3 there is only the inexperienced Walsh.
Best skilled, nippy, footy smart forward/mid is my preference (Reid, Hotton or Berry) with our first pick. Then pick an athletic KD in the second round.

I agree mostly, except I'd rather Reid, Hotton, Allan or Travalgia if one is available. Hopefully we can pick up Mraz with pick 29.

Shanahan would be great.

I wouldn’t have thought that Fremantle would be drafting a tall forward so it also potentially opens up the option to create additional value through a pick swap.

Yep cant see Freo/GWS/WB or Rich needing a KPF so if a slider is not available at 13 it would make sense to trade to Sydney for 19&22, or to GWS for 16&21/37. Could then take Jack Whitlock and get an extra pick.

 

[RossFC]

Narkle didn't nominate?

Guessing he might train with Freo and get a spot after?

 

[Addy23]

Big baller move would be to split 13 and use one of the picks on Shanahan

i.e. 13 to Sydney for 19 and 22 taking Shanahan and Hotton

Yep cant see Freo/GWS/WB or Rich needing a KPF so if a slider is not available at 13 it would make sense to trade to Sydney for 19&22, or to GWS for 16&21/37. Could then take Jack Whitlock and get an extra pick.

Don't think Shanahan will make it to 19. I have doubts whether he'll make it to 13 haha

Richmond literally dont have anyone, they 100% need a KPF. Even if Lynch is fit the full season. Cal on Gettable mentioned that Whitlock twins at 15 and 16 is something thats being looked at. Saints need someone to partner Max King especially with the loss of Membrey so I think they target a tall too. And Melbourne also have had issues with their forward line and Petty hasn't stepped up.

I pray to god we dont take J Whitlock. For starters, I just dont think he's worth anything in the top 20 at least. There'll also be rumours every year that he wants to go back and play with his brother which will annoy everyone.

If its not Shanahan, or Reid, then like you said trade back for 19 and 22. Then I would also trade 36 and 50 for Brisbane's 27. So then we have 19, 22, 27 and 29.

19 and 22 I wouldn't use on the talls and instead would use 27 and 29 to get Barratt and Gerreyn. Take 2 out of Hynes, Dattoli, Hannaford and Gross with 19 and 22.

 

[davesnothere]

If you want a KPF and Armstrong is off the board that's when you split the pick with Sydney for 19 and 22

Don't reach into Whitlock

The thing about Armstrong vs the other talls is playing to Sandringhams midfield.

Armstrong is a good get but at Sandringham you are going to get a lot more opportunities to show off your talent.

 

[Addy23]

The thing about Armstrong vs the other talls is playing to Sandringhams midfield.

Armstrong is a good get but at Sandringham you are going to get a lot more opportunities to show off your talent.

This is one of the reasons why I think Shanahan has a higher ceiling. Not just does Armstrong get better service, he also had Matthew Lloyd coach him at Haileybury and Dragons have much better coaching department. Flipside, Shanahan has also played VFL and excelled albeit low sample size

 

[Addy23]

Narkle didn't nominate?

 

[Peninsula Boy]

If we go Shanahan with 13, then I'd go Hannaford/Gross at 29, Clarke at 36 and Dennis at 50. Gives us a bit in every position we need

Shanahan, Hannaford, Clarke and Dennis would be a mega win for us.

 

[Addy23]

Shanahan, Hannaford, Clarke and Dennis would be a mega win for us.

In my mock draft on X I ended up with Hynes (Shanahan and Reid weren't available), Hannaford, Gerreyn and Dennis.

Could have taken Travaglia or Hotton instead of Hynes for those who dislike Hynes but yeah that may be one way it goes.

The 4 names you mentioned would be awesome for us though. Shanahan replaces Dixon, Clarke is a genuine smokey, in a proper environment I reckon he'd easily have been top 20. Awesome work ethic to travel from Mt Gambier every game and play with Lytle training.

 

[240volt]

If we could somehow snag an Andrews type in the draft that would be amazing.
Been a long time since we had a top shelf key defender.

 

[Peninsula Boy]

In the Armstrong, Shanahan debate, IMHO, I think Shanahan is not only better but would be a better complement to Georgiades and Lukosuis.

To me, he has that innate forward craft you can't teach. His leads are beautifully timed and he marks the ball at the apex which is always a good sign of good technique and timing. He could also built his body to be very powerful.

 

[Peninsula Boy]

In my mock draft on X I ended up with Hynes (Shanahan and Reid weren't available), Hannaford, Gerreyn and Dennis.

Could have taken Travaglia or Hotton instead of Hynes for those who dislike Hynes but yeah that may be one way it goes.

The 4 names you mentioned would be awesome for us though. Shanahan replaces Dixon, Clarke is a genuine smokey, in a proper environment I reckon he'd easily have been top 20. Awesome work ethic to travel from Mt Gambier every game and play with Lytle training.

That's an awesome haul as well but I would've chosen Travaglia or Hotton as you would probably know.

Where did Shanahan go?

 

[Addy23]

That's an awesome haul as well but I would've chosen Travaglia or Hotton as you would probably know.

Where did Shanahan go?

Tigers at 12 (which became 14)

Here is the final draft, we only did 45 picks.

 

[Addy23]

In the Armstrong, Shanahan debate, IMHO, I think Shanahan is not only better but would be a better complement to Georgiades and Lukosuis.

To me, he has that innate forward craft you can't teach. His leads are beautifully timed and he marks the ball at the apex which is always a good sign of good technique and timing. He could also built his body to be very powerful.

I couldn't agree more, I would say Armstrong is a bit one dimensional with his scoring avenues whereas Shanahan offers a bit of variety

 

[Peninsula Boy]

I couldn't agree more, I would say Armstrong is a bit one dimensional with his scoring avenues whereas Shanahan offers a bit of variety

I detect a slight bit of campaigner in him. He's a really good, long kick. He should be able to dob them from on the 50. Smart footballer by hand and foot.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

Commercialise the draft like we did trade period? Sure.

 

[Holden Hillbilly]

 

[Ford Fairlane]

It sounds like it is going to take a decent slider to knock us off a tall pick first. Twomey thinks Shanahan / Whitlock / Faull are all rated in the top tall forwards but ordered differently depending on the recruiters.

 

[davesnothere]

I detect a slight bit of campaigner in him. He's a really good, long kick. He should be able to dob them from on the 50. Smart footballer by hand and foot.

We've now turned Shanahan into a top 5 pick

 

[PortVic]

We've now turned Shanahan into a top 5 pick

So we did win the Houston trade

 

[TazD]

Commercialise the draft like we did trade period? Sure.

It could be worse. It could be a panel show hosted by Barrett who doesn't know what the DVI is or how each academy works.