winty
Moderator
- Moderator
- #851
The commentators on Foxtel mentioned that they think with so many players who are relatively new to the side playing tonight (ie. Kennedy, Kenny, Featherston, O'Rourke, Bragg and Thorne) that we lacked the cohesiveness we would normally have if the players were more familiar with each other.
Makes you wonder then why we never allowed some of the girls to play together more in the VFLW to build up that cohesiveness. I think last year we had a lot more AFLW listed players playing in the VFLW earlier in the season, and then in the last month or so pulled them out to rest them up for the AFLW, which is why the VFLW side crashed out of the top six, but at least it gave the girls a better idea how each other plays. I think we even had Chloe Scheer play a few VFLW games last year. I think this year we were lucky to have half a dozen AFLW listed players play any one week at VFLW level.
I know that when Sydney played a few games against VFLW sides earlier in the season, their team was stacked with AFLW listed players. Pretty sure Hawthorn did the same as well when they flogged us by 16 goals early in the season too.
Just on my last point, I had a look at the sides who played in the VFLW game vs Box Hill I spoke about where we lost 0.2.2 to 14.14.98. Of our AFLW listed players, only Melissa Bragg, Chantal Mason and Brooke Plummer were playing for us (Caitlin Thorne was also playing for Box Hill).
As for the Hawks, Emily Bates, Eliza West, Aine McDonagh, Casey Sheriff, Mackenzie Eardley, Bridie Hipwell, Tamara Smith, Emily Everist, Lucy Wales and Kristy Stratton all played in that match.
So, in other words, it was 3 AFLW listed players vs 10. You only need to look at Hawthorn's improvement this season to see how beneficial building up team synergy by playing together at the lower level has been for them.