-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals
- Thread starter hairy biker
- Start date
- Tagged users None
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Don’t hate this one
Not rapt with his injury history, and we have Fox in the short term, but maybe as a medium defensive option if injuries strike several players. No point as a half back.
- Mar 29, 2019
- 3,428
- 10,120
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I'm hearing Saints picks 8 and 32 for Swans 19, 22, 44.
- Oct 2, 2016
- 12,502
- 26,092
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I wouldn't be able to pick Paton out if a lineup. I know he played for the Saints but that's it
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
We don’t have much after Fox though
Kbroome
Club Legend
- May 10, 2024
- 2,151
- 2,061
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Probably suggests Mills back into the Midfield mix i would think.
The absolute dream would be it means Mills into the midfield mix alongside Rowy and Heeney with Gus as bench mid. Warner to have less mid time and play as a marking forward with 30-40% on ball time. Thus 1 less KPF
- Mar 29, 2019
- 3,428
- 10,120
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I didn't even know that. Never heard of him lol
- Oct 2, 2016
- 12,502
- 26,092
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Top 10 pick, if this really is a super draft is a great get
Kbroome
Club Legend
- May 10, 2024
- 2,151
- 2,061
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Think thats a big win next year tbh because it could allow us extra currency to match our 3 but allow us potentially a chance of getting a first that gets ahead of the matches
The other 8 and 32 for 19 22 and 44 is probably an even bigger win tbh.
- Mar 29, 2019
- 3,428
- 10,120
- AFL Club
- Sydney
And our track history of Top 10 picks outside of the academy is….?
Works out to actual pick 10 if you account for Ashcroft, Lombard and Kako.
Brings Armstrong into it
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Sign me up now
Kbroome
Club Legend
- May 10, 2024
- 2,151
- 2,061
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Swans would be laughing at the Saints
8 turns into 11
19 turns into 22/23
22 turns into 26
32 turns into something like 34
44 actually turns into 40
So its effectively 11 and 34 for 22 26 and 40
Equivalent to 11 and 63 for 22 and 26. Don't think thats an even trade when you simplify the two later picks let alone just 11 for 22 and 26.
Not good enough to play for St Kilda, but somehow good enough for the Swans?
Computer says no.
Computer says no.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Yeah maybe though is he the best option
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
We haven’t had many mate
- Oct 2, 2016
- 12,502
- 26,092
- AFL Club
- Sydney
How far back we going? Not like we've had too many of late
Still I'd take McVeigh, Fosdike, Crouch, Bolton and even Rohan.
Rocca and Grant were good players.
Yeah Stephens was a whiff but Logan will play out as a Swan
You need to get your ears checked.
Seems odd that we'd open up more senior list spots (Francis & Hamling) if we only intended to take 2 at the draft.
(and yes, I know, we also have pick 59 .... but really, are we hanging our hopes on finding a good 'un at 59?)
Last edited:
Seems far fetched
59 will come in. And yes, we could find a good player there, plenty of late picks have turned out well. Neale was pick 58. Dawson was in the 50s, we used pick 53 last year.
Plus it gives us the option to take someone before another 16 rookie selections if we were otherwise going to wait until the rookie draft.
If you're thinking about mature agers it's not a bad pick to have/use.
