Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Ling ranked 60s. Lol.Stephens was ranked in the top 7-10 prior to the draft was hardly a reach at all. Stephens best games as a junior were as an inside he actually was drafted as an inside/out midfielder. Wasn’t as if it was Ling who was ranked 60’s and we took him first round. Was
Stephens was in most Top 10s. Was mentioned at 5 or 6 as potential picks in some.
He'd played senior SANFL games and performed well.
No idea how people come up with some of this stuff.
Ling ranked 60s. Lol.
Twomey's last rankings had him at 21, phantom draft at 23. Fox had him at 22. Think there was one st the time mentioning him late teens.
He wasn't a bolter. He'd been around the same mark in earlier rankings.He was a complete bolter, those are the selections I hate and it’s not that we took him it was that we could have traded down and done the same thing. I’ve said that for a while, draft who you want but if you are taking a bolter trade down grab an extra pick.
Ling ranked 60s. Lol.
Twomey's last rankings had him at 21, phantom draft at 23. Fox had him at 22. Think there was one at the time mentioning him late teens.
He was also ranked outside of the top 30 in some PDs, please don’t make out that Ling was a concensis top 20 selection because he wasn’t
Picking him at 14 was a reach when there were other better credentialed players with more potential available at that selection
He was also ranked outside of the top 30 in some PDs, please don’t make out that Ling was a concensis top 20 selection because he wasn’t
Picking him at 14 was a reach when there were other better credentialed players with more potential available at that selection
Go for it. There have been people on this board saying unless there were unexpected cuts, we would be taking the minimum at the draft for a months.What i said was that KB interviewed a kid from my club and told him we will only use 3 picks and at best 4 . I can go back a few weeks and find it if you like . Anymore info im happy to provide , always good to talk with you
Stephens was almost consensus top 10 and his stocks rose on the back of playing in the SANFL reserves as an inside mid.Felt the stuff up was picking Stephens more than not picking Serong. A skinny framed flanker type who was rank 40, in no one’s Top 10 or even 20, we pick at 5.
Stephens was almost consensus top 10 and his stocks rose on the back of playing in the SANFL reserves as an inside mid.
On reflection yes lots of positive feedback at the time.Stephens was almost consensus top 10 and his stocks rose on the back of playing in the SANFL reserves as an inside mid.
Perhaps not, but that isn't the same as "A skinny framed flanker type who was rank 40, in no one’s Top 10 or even 20, we pick at 5."On reflection yes lots of positive feedback at the time.
No one had him Top 5 tho did they ? Had a look he was 9th or 10th or so in the phantom.
That’s fair. Stand by that it was a crap pick and was WTFing on draft night. Why pick a 10 rank when you have 5 ? Esp a skinny flanker type. Reality is a fair chance he would have gone about 20 on the night. Massive overs.Perhaps not, but that isn't the same as "A skinny framed flanker type who was rank 40, in no one’s Top 10 or even 20, we pick at 5."