Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you think of it like that if we disregard that trade we end up with Grundy and Cleary but don't have pick #22 that we got from North for Stephens last year as we would have asked for junk picks rather than that future 1st at the timeMight’ve been a terrible draft but we had a free hit at one of the best out of it and chose to overlook him for some inexplicable reason
Also we got Grundy for junk picks, the trade would’ve proceeded regardless, we just would’ve used other junkier picks
Go back over that draft, it is looking to be a decent draft especially the first 12 picks. We did badly, some players have taken a while to come along but we're the only club to strike out completelyEveryone gets up and arms about the Weddle thing it was a terrible draft go through the first round there’s probably 5 decent blokes in the first 25 picks. Yes the Hawks lucked out it happens. The trade allowed us to have the picks for Grundy
Yep need to manipulate picks to eventually trade them, not actually draft someone with them unless it is bid matchingI think the moral of the story is that we are very clever at manipulating picks but terrible at actually using them.
My theory:I think the moral of the story is that we are very clever at manipulating picks but terrible at actually using them.
We do well in the rookie draft, and MSD. Something allows us to find a diamond in the rough but we're unable to differentiate between starsI think the moral of the story is that we are very clever at manipulating picks but terrible at actually using them.
Go back over that draft, it is looking to be a decent draft especially the first 12 picks. We did badly, some players have taken a while to come along but we're the only club to strike out completely
Might’ve been a terrible draft but we had a free hit at one of the best out of it and chose to overlook him for some inexplicable reason
Also we got Grundy for junk picks, the trade would’ve proceeded regardless, we just would’ve used other junkier picks
Darcy Jones another small forward taken just after us. He's looking goodPity we weren’t picking in the first 12…from our range it wasn’t a great draft. It was expected COVID draft
We flubbed that draft. Pure and simple. No need to keep excusing the club for it.We wanted Ed Allen unfortunately the Pies took him. I’d have rather taken Allen then traded our next to the Hawks
Darcy Jones another small forward taken just after us. He's looking good
We flubbed that draft. Pure and simple. No need to keep excusing the club for it.
We do well in the MSD? Not one hit.We do well in the rookie draft, and MSD. Something allows us to find a diamond in the rough but we're unable to differentiate between stars
I thought McLean was from the MSD but you're right, none of them have come goodWe do well in the MSD? Not one hit.
You say that, but it's not true. Even if we didn't pick a true tall, we still gave up a pick because we didn't rate players and got Vickery instead.It was a covid draft clubs were more likely to stuff it than not. The talls everyone wanted here have been duds, Weddle is playing as a tall utility
SSPI thought McLean was from the MSD but you're right, none of them have come good
Surely our man LP1 should take a day off and do his , won't get caught as has doubled the total of 2ndI LOVE this phantom draft.
First-round AFL Phantom Draft: Who your club could pick on night 1
With six bids and 28 picks, this is ESPN draft expert Jasper Chellappah's first-round phantom mock, a month out from the 2024 AFL Draft. Who will your club pick on the first night?www.espn.com.au
I did notice that our form drop came around the same time that the final set of long term contracts were signed, and also when it became clear that Warner wasn’t going to re-sign this year.Does anyone else get the sense that we were a little too trigger happy locking away players to long-term contracts, possibly on slightly inflated salaries given we were flying at the time we were announcing our re-signings? Only for the players to ultimately get shown up in the GF.
Given we were inactive over the trade period and offloaded Parker and konstanty. We are either stacking salary cap to pay Chad a kings random at the end of next year or have a trade target in mind.
I just feel as though we FOMO'd when stocks were at their peak and may have overvalued the players we currently have.
Good call on Lloyd. I think Caeser has been making similar observations.My draft update
As always, I look at things from a list perspective.
View attachment 2150495
Just having a look at the list.
I have put in our prospective academy players in purple with a 25. Those we get next year as academy players.
I have put in what I think we will draft.
We are short in the forwards. KPF, small and mid sized. I reckon this is the key area we will target but we always take mids. Mids then go back and forward. The Swans way.
Bearing in mind the 3 prospective players coming in from the academy, what list spots are vacant.
So I reckon we go a small forward and KPF with our first two picks. I can see us going Datolli. We delisted Konstanty who was a pick in the first round so clearly an area we need to bolster. I know we brought in Hanily but both he and Wicks are sort of on notice to improve. Wicks on his day is great. On his day. Hanily has been here 5 minutes. We need a player now. So I reckon our first is Datolli.
KPF there are a few probably available at our pick. Faull the Whitlocks. I dunno. But we do need KPF depth going forward. Our Current 3 talls plus Buller are not tearing the house down.
We could do a medium forward too but I reckon we don't. Our excess mids can rest there.
If we miss out on a preferred small or KPF I reckon we go inside mid. Kennedy has been mentioned. Adams won't be around long. Some on the list who are inside have questions. So this is an option.
We probably pick up Cochrane late as a KPD.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why we shit the bed update
Looking at the list from a Harry Hindsight view, looking in the rear view mirror. Having digested much of the brilliance of the forum, the disappointment of the grand final, the many views as to why we shit the bed in the GF. I take a sober look at the list. This will always be my primary source of objective opinion of what is missing and what we need to win a GF.
The problem is usually in the mids. They play everywhere. In the midfield, in defence and in the forwards.
I am not blaming Roberts. He has played well. But he forced Lloyd into the midfield because Lloyd is Lloyd. You can't drop Lloyd. Well Lloyd going into the midfield added another 'outside' mid along with McInerney, Campbell, Warner, JJ, Gulden.
Our Inside mids, truly inside mids were Rowy and Heeney.
We had Adams on the sideline, Mills not considered due to fitness/injury, Sheldrick probably no recent AFL experience and Cleary too inexperienced. We could have done with Adams first. Mills was rusty so I understnd them leaving him out. Sheldrick was sitting on the fence too long and had a bad case of splinters. Cleary clearly too inexperienced. Obviously.
Conclusion.
Our mix of mids had few ball winners. What did we do in the GF/ We did not win the ball. But we have ball winners in the team that can do the job.
I think the mids are there but the mix of mids is maybe the problem.
Surely our man LP1 should take a day off and do his , won't get caught as has doubled the total of 2nd
I expect nothing less than a YouTube channel.I have almost done mine anyway have us taking a tall and a small
I expect nothing less than a YouTube channel.
You'll see me in the comments section asking about Hynes 100%You do not want me talking about a few of them on a YouTube lol