Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 101,012
- 253,807
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #18,956
2024 Picks
2025 Picks
2025 Picks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just don't think we will land all three is all. It would be a mega off season if we did.
Max Hall, he has played really well all season for Box Hill. Over the last 3 or 4 games hasn't really been mentioned in our best players, but clearly was. The same thing happened before Newc was selected and we know Sam seems to like picking up Box Hill players. 22 years old and hard at it.View attachment 1997802
According to AFL.com.au we have already opened up a spot for the MSD with Sammy Butler.
We have a stack of depth. We need a superstar.You need list depth. We take the players we can
I would take Battle ahead of a few players in our team.İt's either of Perryman or battle, not both.
The 2021 mid season draft was the draft to pick players who didn’t play in 2020 due to COVID and 2022 was also still a chance to get some players who had not played much due to COVID.Durham too
Sent from my SM-G990E using Tapatalk
Why would the Dogs trade Smith for a future 1st? Would you trade Will Day to Adelaide for a future 1st if he wanted to go home?There is a world where we land Battle, Perryman, Smith (F1) and keep our first this year.
Would be a really strong offseason.
Building a strong team. Makes it possible to lure a superstar or a star. Its always about the team never about the individual. Hawthorn and i have always believed thatWe have a stack of depth. We need a superstar.
No team has had more superstars in the history of the game than our club.Building a strong team. Makes it possible to lure a superstar or a star. Its always about the team never about the individual. Hawthorn and i have always believed that
We have a stack of young players that are going to need pay rises soon. If we pay a couple of players $3.5 mill over 5 years or $4.2 mill over 6 years to get them to join us our “war chest” will quickly disappear.Building a strong team. Makes it possible to lure a superstar or a star. Its always about the team never about the individual. Hawthorn and i have always believed that
Can we not just front end contracts while our books have lots of space? If we have to low ball a younger player who is worse than an established player does it really matter if they get squeezed out?We have a stack of young players that are going to need pay rises soon. If we pay a couple of players $3.5 mill over 5 years or $4.2 mill over 6 years to get them to join us our “war chest” will quickly disappear.
No you are drastically drastically overrating Sicily the forward.A lot of people are underestimating Sicily as a forward.
He would be a top 5 KPF if he played there permanently.
He is a very good player and they offered him 5 years, that is not a discard.I'm very wary of picking up Giants discards, that's what immediately comes to mind with this one
What else do you do when the player is OOC, wants to leave? Smith's value is somwhere in that 8-14 range. Our future first would most likely sit somewhere inside that and they could hope we have another down year.Why would the Dogs trade Smith for a future 1st? Would you trade Will Day to Adelaide for a future 1st if he wanted to go home?
It will be our first this year if Smith wants us.What else do you do when the player is OOC, wants to leave? Smith's value is somwhere in that 8-14 range. Our future first would most likely sit somewhere inside that and they could hope we have another down year.
Hardly like we are trying to bend them over. Similar to how they got Dawson from the Swans, when a player is OOC you just have very little leverage.
Most likely what they'll ask for. But if we're bottom 4-5 I just can't see us going for it. Maybe if they throw pick 9-13 back?It will be our first this year if Smith wants us.
Lol a premiership is a premiership. I dont need them looking good while doing it. Its the cup that matters nothing else. If we grind our way to it then so be it wont change anything in the history books. By the way we have a few superstar / stars already on the books they are just youngNo team has had more superstars in the history of the game than our club.
A successful team worth watching needs superstar talents who submit to the 'team-first' ethos.
A bunch of mediocre-good committed players will rarely win a premiership, and when they do it will be dog ugly to watch...like Sydney back in the day. No thanks. I hope we aspire to emulate our history.
Lol a premiership is a premiership. I dont need them looking good while doing it. Its the cup that matters nothing else. If we grind our way to it then so be it wont change anything in the history books. By the way we have a few superstar / stars already on the books they are just young
Not a discard at allI'm very wary of picking up Giants discards, that's what immediately comes to mind with this one
Day isn't OOCWhy would the Dogs trade Smith for a future 1st? Would you trade Will Day to Adelaide for a future 1st if he wanted to go home?
That depends where our first falls, if it falls in the top 3 or so i highly highly doubt it. If it falls in the 8-10 it is more likely.It will be our first this year if Smith wants us.
Did someone say ambassador payments?Probably wouldn't get too excited about Perryman anyway.
A GWS academy kid who is in their leadership group and a best 22 player for a side who should be competing for flags for the next 5 years.
I'll be surprised if he leaves.