Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 100,988
- 253,709
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #18,956
2024 Picks
2025 Picks
2025 Picks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The afl machine wouldn't be spruiking for two firsts if this was 12 months ago when the hawks werent as relevant.It's a little weird to me that West Coast are dragging this out.
Id say to most neutral observers pick 14 for a good 28 year old KPD with injury concerns is probably spot on the money?
Sometimes I find trade week a bit like that David Attenborough documentary on the Birds of Paradise, lots of jumping up and down and making loud noises to impress
NOwies.The Herald Sun is reporting that Carlton's Matt Owies is looking around for a new club and is seeking a multi-year deal worth between 7 and 8 hundred thousand a year.
GTFOwies?NOwies.
Hopefully we are Clint!Slight risk that Eagles will just tell Barrass that he will be playing for them next season if they don't get what they believe is fair compensation.
Could end up like this...
View attachment 2135305
The Herald Sun is reporting that Carlton's Matt Owies is looking around for a new club and is seeking a multi-year deal worth between 7 and 8 hundred thousand a year.
They were clearly stating that it was per yearAs in total contract value over the multiple years? That's the only way that sentence makes sense.
According to the “the draft is complex not compromised” Laura Kane, pick 42 is a late first rounder…I saw it reported as Band 4 compo being pick 42. That's 3rd round isn't it?
They were clearly stating that it was per year
It was "Owious" for the rest of us.I was clearly making a joke at Owies' expense.
I was clearly making a joke at Owies' expense.
The Herald Sun is reporting that Carlton's Matt Owies is looking around for a new club and is seeking a multi-year deal worth between 7 and 8 hundred thousand a year.
Jack macrae is fringe 22 at the moment on good coin and the Dogs can move him on. Plays probably the easiest role in the AFL to find (although does it well)Jack McCrae - 30yo, 3 x All Australian, Premiership player. Media consensus: worth a bag of peanuts and a half eaten pie
Tom Barrass - 29yo, Zero All Australian, Premiership player. Media consensus: Pick 14 plus shitloads more
I wasn’t talking WCE, if you read previous posts of mine you know that I’ve said before that it’s not them, it’s the media.I get a bit sick of this argument, the league IS mature enough already.
Nobody is 'tough guy posturing' outside of argument on bigfooty and idiots on trade radio and the general media filling space.
Nothing the Eagles have said is anything other than playing a straight bat to direct questions which can't be answered.
Most deals DO get done leaving both clubs happy.
Argument on forums don't represent how shit really goes down.
The trope that the league needs to grow up is so tired.
Sent from my SM-A156E using Tapatalk
I think it’s what happens the morning after eating Indian food and drinking rum?Who the **** is Matt Owies?
3 x All Australian. Reports he has some sort of beef with Bevo, who, let's face it, has been roundly lambasted all year for strange selections. Easiest role in the AFL? Big bodied midfielders dont grow on trees. Longmire wouldve chewed his arm off to have him sitting on the benchJack macrae is fringe 22 at the moment on good coin and the Dogs can move him on. Plays probably the easiest role in the AFL to find (although does it well)
Barrass would walk in to any 22 and plays one of the hardest roles to find in the AFL.
They aren’t comparable
Pick 14 and our future second is a fair deal considering he is contracted, so we have to overpay a bit. Two firsts would be overpaying too much.Would pick 14 and our future 2nd be a fair and equitable trade for Barrass? This seems to me to be about right, thoughts?
One paced accumulating midfielders are easily the easiest player to find I. The AFL. I have a lot of time for Jack who has been great, but the values aren’t at all comparable.3 x All Australian. Reports he has some sort of beef with Bevo, who, let's face it, has been roundly lambasted all year for strange selections. Easiest role in the AFL? Big bodied midfielders dont grow on trees. Longmire wouldve chewed his arm off to have him sitting on the bench
I do get why because it’s the AFL, but the problem with free agency compo is that the usually strong receiving club don’t give up anything except cap space which is easy to manipulate. Why not simply make FA like father son or academy players? Calculate the pick value and that becomes the sending clubs bid, then the club match that value like they would for a bid. This relies on the mooted tightening up of the DVI to remove junk points from junk picks coming in. In that way the sending club get decent pick or picks, the receiving club get sole access to the player who nominated them but they have to pay with draft capital. Would also stop these inflated contracts for average players because they avoid using picks as well. I get they will argue potential restraint of trade and it is a little but I think that is worth it to make things fairer.I actually don't mind this. But I'd imagine the Players Association would and would argue its restraint of trade.
Theyre comparable in the following ways - both same age and very similar amount of experience. Yes, one's a defender and one's a mid, that's obvious. I'm not trying to compare a trapeze artist with a lion tamer, but both are essential components of a circus. Capiche?One paced accumulating midfielders are easily the easiest player to find I. The AFL. I have a lot of time for Jack who has been great, but the values aren’t at all comparable.
Except Macrae isn’t an essential part of the circus, in fact he is touring with them but only making an appearance right at the end in the background. That’s the point.Theyre comparable in the following ways - both same age and very similar amount of experience. Yes, one's a defender and one's a mid, that's obvious. I'm not trying to compare a trapeze artist with a lion tamer, but both are essential components of a circus. Capiche?
It sounds complex and will likely get gamed.I do get why because it’s the AFL, but the problem with free agency compo is that the usually strong receiving club don’t give up anything except cap space which is easy to manipulate. Why not simply make FA like father son or academy players? Calculate the pick value and that becomes the sending clubs bid, then the club match that value like they would for a bid. This relies on the mooted tightening up of the DVI to remove junk points from junk picks coming in. In that way the sending club get decent pick or picks, the receiving club get sole access to the player who nominated them but they have to pay with draft capital. Would also stop these inflated contracts for average players because they avoid using picks as well. I get they will argue potential restraint of trade and it is a little but I think that is worth it to make things fairer.