Be a good sub. Maybe it will smooth out the all or nothing.And the week before that he won us the game off his boot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Be a good sub. Maybe it will smooth out the all or nothing.And the week before that he won us the game off his boot.
Mainly that he’s younger and seems a bit more mobile.What exactly do you mean by more upside?
Whomever might be down on form.So if he performs well in the WAFL, and we have a fully fit team, who does he come in for?
He's averaging 16 touches and 1.3 goals a game this year. Only 4 less shots at goal than Treacy.Be a good sub. Maybe it will smooth out the all or nothing.
Darcy was out. And like I said Banfield and Voss (Corbett) have overtaken him this year.Whomever might be down on form.
Sturt didn't come in for injuries late last year as far as I could see. Switkowski and Schultz were playing in that run and we had Amiss, Treacy (and Corbett) in the side as well. Ironically he most likely came in to replace Banfield who had hit the skids.
They know how old any player they draft is and every player on our list for that matter.Well they knew how old he was when they drafted him. I highly doubt they drafted him just to keep him on the list for two years and let him go. He's next in if any of our smalls get injured and is very good depth.
"Overtaken" is a fickle classification. It can change for any number of reasons. A late '23 edition Sturt is a more than handy addition to the side (as would be a '22 edition O'Driscoll... although it is more than a bit distant in the rearview mirror right now).Darcy was out. And like I said Banfield and Voss (Corbett) have overtaken him this year.
They have overtaken him in this point in time as proven by team selection. Sturt is yet to show enough to earn his spot back in the team over those who have been chosen ahead of him. Simple as that."Overtaken" is a fickle classification. It can change for any number of reasons. A late '23 edition Sturt is a more than handy addition to the side (as would be a '22 edition O'Driscoll... although it is more than a bit distant in the rearview mirror right now).
"Darcy was out"? Cone on.
Don't think there's anything in our NGA that's even close tbh. Don't think that'll be a problem for Williams.My thoughts that no one asked for:
Banfield - Tough one. Ideally one year extension but I doubt he takes that if he's offered more somewhere else.
Williams - Depends on our NGA prospects. Likely delist. But keep on another year if no one else. Injury prone.
Wagner - 2 year extension. Think he's really underrated.
Hughes - Delist.
Stanley - 1 year extension.
Corbett - Delist.
Taberner - Delist. Back issues too big a problem.
NOD - 1 year. Promising 2022 and underwhelming 2023 onwards but riddled injury and illness. Give him another chance to get back.
Odin - Delist. Concussion recovery an issue.
Voss - 2 years.
Sturt - Delist/1 year depending on forward depth. Into his 6th year so he's really pushing it.
Kuek - Delist. Harsh but that ACL really came at the worst time. Again pending other forward depth.
Emmett - 2 years
Then there's the two rucks which I have no opinion on because in my mind they're both excess to needs and only play if both Jackson and Darcy are injured at the same time.
Pretend we drafted Johnson at 10 and Ras at 21 and we have 6 wins.Here are Fremantle's first round picks from the last little while:
2021 - #8 Amiss, #10 Erasmus
2020 - #14 Chapman
2019 - #7 Young, #8 Serong, #9 Henry
2018 - #17 Sturt
2017 - #2 Brayshaw, #5 Cerra
2016 - #8 Logue
2015
2014 - #13 Lachie Weller
There's five wins in that group out of eleven.
Nod hasn’t fired a shot in two years really, I’m not calling for anyone to be delisted (well, maybe Hughes because the discussions I was having with people at the start of the year annoyed me), I’m saying what I think will happen. Sturt is lucky he plays in a position we have no quality and a best 22 about to retire.It's irrelevant when it comes to list management decisions. But it's relevant in discussions on this board.
They could have played him on the weekend and played Reidy forward/ruck, basically only had one tall though a couple of mediums in Bell and Sturt.But he’s in Perl reserves through lack of opportunity in the seniors (mainly because of Reidy). I watched them both in pre season and believe Knobel offers more than Reidy. The main thing is I don’t believe you can keep two because the only way they get a game is if both Jackson and Darcy are injured at the same time which seems unlikely.
It's a bit of a straw clutch. A few degrees of separation between Darcy and Sturt. As I said Banfield could of stayed in.They have overtaken him in this point in time as proven by team selection. Sturt is yet to show enough to earn his spot back in the team over those who have been chosen ahead of him. Simple as that.
Darcy was out. What's hard to understand? Darcy out means an extra forward in the side.
Nod has been dealing with an injury this whole year. Which really means he's had one season where he didn't fire a shot. He actually looked good when he was playing injury free in the practice match. Not to mention he has a whole seasons' body of work where he was a key player in a side that made finals.Nod hasn’t fired a shot in two years really, I’m not calling for anyone to be delisted (well, maybe Hughes because the discussions I was having with people at the start of the year annoyed me), I’m saying what I think will happen. Sturt is lucky he plays in a position we have no quality and a best 22 about to retire.
Noddy is basically behind Sharp, Stanley (from what I can tell) and any other mid they can rotate through a wing (JOM, Johnson, Ras, Brayshaw).
We do this every year, there will be 7 leave the list at least and that’s being generous and including the two that have basically been delisted already.
And frankly, you’re just a Sturt hater now and jump on people saying anything positive about the guy. I even said he was in the firing line
I cannot fathom how someone can hate a player of their football team so much that you can quite literally post 30 to 40 times a week when his name is brought up. It's staggering.I'm a Sturt hater thanks to the people on this board that put him on a pedestal compared to literally any other player.
Ignore button mate. It's your best friend. I have no personal problem with Sturt and wouldn't be arguing so much about him if there was even one other balanced opinion of him on this board.I cannot fathom how someone can hate a player of their football team so much that you can quite literally post 30 to 40 times a week when his name is brought up. It's staggering.
Can't help but draw the inference it is personal.Ignore button mate. It's your best friend. I have no personal problem with Sturt and wouldn't be arguing so much about him if there was even one other balanced opinion of him on this board.
Weird hill to die on.Ignore button mate. It's your best friend. I have no personal problem with Sturt and wouldn't be arguing so much about him if there was even one other balanced opinion of him on this board.
It is not personal in the slightest. I would love absolutely nothing more than for me to come out of the end of this with egg on my face after he cements his spot in our forward line. I just don't think that Sturt is the type of player that will fix our forward line problems because he's way too similar to Amiss in the way that he scores and he doesn't do enough without the ball.Can't help but draw the inference it is personal.