- Moderator
- #5,001
Orange crush Any of those small forwards you've got lying around want more of an opportunity? We're owed for Hogan ;p
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know the club's list management has improved since the heady days of the late 90's, early 2000's (Trent Croad anyone?) but they still make some head scratching decisions.
Why did we offer 4 years for O Meara? (Should have offered 2. 3 max).
Why did we feel the need to sign Darcy until 2030?
Why did we give Will Brodie a 4 year deal?
Also, they are both champions of the club but Fyfe and Walters should be on 1 year deals (then extend when needed). There is no way Alastair Clarkson would be giving his champions in their twilight years anymore than 1 year extensions.
We need to be a little bit more ruthless at this club.
He's one of the better kicks in the whole league in my opinion. If he played as a roaming forward for us he'd improve our forward entries for sure.I would, I think he'd look fantastic basically playing as a medium forward for us
If Jaeger falls out of the best 22 at the end of the year (highly likely on current form) he has another 2 years of being paid without playing. That doesn't sound like great list management to me. The same thing with Will Brodie. Look, I think they should be on our list for depth, it's just that they should not have been offered 4 year deals.What would our team look like this year if we'd offered Fyfe and Walters 1 year deals and they'd finished their careers elsewhere for longer deals? Absolute no brainer. Keeping a team together is much more important than letting important leaders go for nothing to appease fans who want their contracts to be one year shorter.
Also what harm is there having Will Brodie and Jaeger on the list? How is it actually hurting us? Oh no we have excellent mature depth, what a s**t place to be in
If Jaeger falls out of the best 22 at the end of the year (highly likely on current form) he has another 2 years of being paid without playing. That doesn't sound like great list management to me. The same thing with Will Brodie. Look, I think they should be on our list for depth, it's just that they should not have been offered 4 year deals.
On Fyfe and Walters, the harsh reality is that, for most AFL players, the cliff comes fast over the age of 33. Ruthless clubs, like Hawthorn and Geelong, do not offer multi year contracts at that point. Tom Hawkins, for example, has shown far superior form to both Walters and Fyfe in the last 3 years, has only been on 1 year deals.
The benefit of JOM which has already been seen this season is he can slot into multiple positions like Aish. He has already played forward, wing, midfield and back this year and also the difference between his best and worst is relatively small compared to players like Banfield, Sturt, etc.If Jaeger falls out of the best 22 at the end of the year (highly likely on current form) he has another 2 years of being paid without playing. That doesn't sound like great list management to me. The same thing with Will Brodie. Look, I think they should be on our list for depth, it's just that they should not have been offered 4 year deals.
On Fyfe and Walters, the harsh reality is that, for most AFL players, the cliff comes fast over the age of 33. Ruthless clubs, like Hawthorn and Geelong, do not offer multi year contracts at that point. Tom Hawkins, for example, has shown far superior form to both Walters and Fyfe in the last 3 years, has only been on 1 year deals.
Straight swap of your choice for TreacyOrange crush Any of those small forwards you've got lying around want more of an opportunity? We're owed for Hogan ;p
You don't need any more keys though.Straight swap of your choice for Treacy
For when Jesse retiresYou don't need any more keys though.
You got Hogan for pick 54, how about saints 4th for one of your excess smalls, Jones would look good in purple.Straight swap of your choice for Treacy
Sounds fair to me.You got Hogan for pick 54, how about saints 4th for one of your excess smalls, Jones would look good in purple.
Being serious, you guys could do worse than look at Conor Stone …. Former 1st rounder and killing it in vfl team …. Not a small but has a lot to offerYou got Hogan for pick 54, how about saints 4th for one of your excess smalls, Jones would look good in purple.
I'd be happy to take Brent Danielsoff your hands.PLAYERCARDSTART16Brent Daniels
- Age
- 25
- Ht
- 172cm
- Wt
- 75kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 12.9
- 3star
- K
- 6.4
- 3star
- HB
- 6.5
- 4star
- M
- 2.6
- 3star
- T
- 2.9
- 4star
- G
- 0.4
- 3star
- D
- 10.3
- 3star
- K
- 4.3
- 2star
- HB
- 6.0
- 3star
- M
- 1.9
- 2star
- T
- 1.9
- 3star
- G
- 0.0
- 1star
- D
- 9.0
- 3star
- K
- 3.6
- 2star
- HB
- 5.4
- 4star
- M
- 1.6
- 2star
- T
- 3.0
- 5star
- G
- 0.8
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
That's because the difference in shades of meh is very negligible. JOM adds nothing. He hasn't showed the polish we thought we would get.The benefit of JOM which has already been seen this season is he can slot into multiple positions like Aish. He has already played forward, wing, midfield and back this year and also the difference between his best and worst is relatively small compared to players like Banfield, Sturt, etc.
That's because the difference in shades of meh is very negligible. JOM adds nothing. He hasn't showed the polish we thought we would get.
His best game would prob be equal to an average Banfield game this season
Jones is the other one that needs monitoring, you dont want to be a rookie pick then miss half the season. I think Nod is in a lot of trouble, so is Wagner. Sturt might be saved from lack of forward options but is treading thin ice.Actually think it's going to get rather tight at years end if we don't lose any players to trade tbh.
We've got to remember Voss is essentially an extra rookie list we wanted normally have (replacing either Kuek or Corbett). Our MSD pick assuming it happens is essentially the same. Worker's upgrade to senior list negates the fact that Corbett is on the senior list.
So we'd need to delist two to even break even then however many more to get enough picks to use on the draft and/or bring in trade targets.
I'd select one key forward out of Taberner, Voss, Corbett and Kuek and delist the rest. For me I'm picking Voss to stay.
Its hard to see Hughes getting a new deal at this stage. He's 30 by the time next season starts and isn't best 22. There's other depth options on our list even if they're not as versatile.
Reidy might not be needed anymore if Knobel is WAFL standard and maybe ready to play a game or two if required next year. Reidy might be a trade option rather than delisted though. Clubs seem willing to pay a future 3rd/4th to get depth rucks onto their list.
After that it gets pretty hard imo. Got to find at least one more IMO out of NOD, Stanley, Wagner, Sturt, Emmett and Banfield. There's zero chance it's the last two btw. I don't really want to delist any of them. One of that group would need to be moved to the rookie list too.
I've assumed the club will use the four decent picks (or three and Baker) but if we bring in some other trade targets I can actually see there being more changes.
For someone like Banfield you'd assume it's about security. Never has had the most certain spot in the team, had to fight for everything, now engaged. That seems to suit us fine as well: when we really want to extend a player we seem to like giving the extra year presumably in return for lower yearly salary. He'll probably sign like 3 years.Here's a head scratcher. Bailey Banfield is an unrestricted free agent this year. Are we likely to offer him a contract soon or will he walk for nothing?
I'd love Freo to keep him. His experience and effort are unquestionable, and his team vibe is good. Seems like a no-brainer to me. I just hope we don't low-ball him so much that another team turns his head with some big $.
Thoughts?
No current season stats available
Wagner is safe in my opinion. We need more depth players that can use the football or as soon as we get an injury our skills at afl level go down. Wagner footskills against West Perth on the weekend were superb.Jones is the other one that needs monitoring, you dont want to be a rookie pick then miss half the season. I think Nod is in a lot of trouble, so is Wagner. Sturt might be saved from lack of forward options but is treading thin ice.
Corbett
Kuek
Tabs
Noddy
Wagner
Hughes
I imagine those names at a minimum and because Reidy provides sort of KPF depth by helping keep Jackson forward, they might try to keep him. I will be very angry if they let Stanley go
'Intangibles'. Right.My plan is to watch O'Meara closely on Friday and see how many of the intangibles he contributes