Banfield has been fantastic this seasonBolton is better than anything we’ve got at Peel and we are in our window now, as for who he replaces in our side Banfield for one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Banfield has been fantastic this seasonBolton is better than anything we’ve got at Peel and we are in our window now, as for who he replaces in our side Banfield for one.
Yeah but he’s no Bolton.Banfield has been fantastic this season
List management is easy if you don't have list sizes, salary caps or limited development resources.Did anyone read the article in the west today that goes over all our uncontracted players and who we should sign on, and somehow comes to the conclusion that pretty much everyone except Taberner should get a 1 year deal at least
If you went by fanbases, no-one would ever be delisted while bringing in 5 guns every year.List management is easy if you don't have list sizes, salary caps or limited development resources.
My personal favourite is the people who want to delist the whole list because they're not perfect.If you went by fanbases, no-one would ever be delisted while bringing in 5 guns every year.
I don’t see it. I think he’s a bit like Chad Wingard. Largely been figured out and won’t recapture that form. He made his mark in the Dustin Martin era, the latter was unstoppable allowing a lot of free space to Bolton.
I want us to extend Treacy, Brayshaw, and Sturt before we start looking at big fish. We need to get this done ASAP. Then we will know how much salary cap we have left. Bolton and Warner will both cost a fortune in picks, but Warner will cost like 50% more in salary. If we lock down our star players and add Bolton, I doubt anyone would complain (besides Freo Girl).I mean, for me it’s not so much whether Bolton would fit in the team as much as what the opportunity cost of his salary and trade price.
The HBG guys were saying that at the start of the year, we should offer our 3 first round picks this year, and even then suggesting Richmond would probably say no.
If the price was more like a 1st and a 2nd I’d be far more inclined, provided it doesn’t interfere with Warner hunt and Sturt/Banners, etc
Surely Bolton, given contract length and current form, would now be in the "we're only casually asking" category. Or if he fell into a Richmond Fire Sale bin. He's not likely to go anywhere else this year and we can go about seeing what shakes out elsewhere with our picks this trade period.I mean for me it’s not so much whether Bolton would fit in the team as much as what the opportunity cost of his salary and trade price.
The HBG guys were saying at the start of the year we should offer our 3 first round picks this year, and even then suggesting Richmond would probably say no.
If the price was more like a 1st and a 2nd I’d be far more inclined, provided it doesn’t interfere with Warner hunt and Sturt/Banners etc
I'm slowly watching the ruck options across the league sign on with their clubs. I reckon they'll be interest in Reidy if that continues. We'd get **** all but it's best for him to find him a new club than delist him because we've got to bring Knobel through.Hughes and Tabs will be gone.
Walters could retire, I don't think he is ready yet.
Trade a few ?
Cull some of the rookies ?
It's tight.
No. In talks to extend with piesI haven't really gone through this thread so just quickly - is Bobby Hill an option? Seems a perfect fit for what we need, would be good to have another Hill in Purple again.
Ive got a friend that works at Christ Church where Austin goes to school. I'll ask him about the kid with the great name.Had to look him up. Austin van der Struyf. Now that's a name for the ages.
Austin van der Struyf Draft Profile
central.rookieme.com
I haven't really gone through this thread so just quickly - is Bobby Hill an option? Seems a perfect fit for what we need, would be good to have another Hill in Purple again.
He kicked 2 points yesterday and his own supporters want him gone. Yeah, such a great catch to pay overs for. If he was OOC and you got him cheaply, it’s worth having a crack, but he’s contracted.I don’t understand this bit have to fit Simpson delean kuek in? They need to earn their spots. Kuek & delean are coming from a long way back, Simpson has shown glimpses but if a player like Bolton wants to come to your footy club you do everything you can to get it done. Bolton is a proven match winner. The 3 kids you have named are no where near it at this point. 2 of them haven’t even played at the level yet
But he’s not OOC which is why you wouldn’t reward Richmond like WCE had to do for Kelly. The Richmond board are screaming for Richmond to get rid of him, so there’s no guarantees he would be better at Freo.Genuine question, if Bolton was out of contract, would a fair price for him be. He's a gun but there is a fair bit of mayo that goes with him from Tigers fans (who think all their players are incredible and not fairly rated). I'd be comfortable giving up a top 10 pick, not much more though.
I think if Richmond were open to letting him go this year (and honestly, with how he's playing...), I'd need a very firm commitment from Warner for next year to turn down slotting Baker into Switta's role. That is a massive upgrade and can easily be the difference in a flag or not...
Agree.. of course everyone wants Chad but at what price monetary and synergyBut he’s not OOC which is why you wouldn’t reward Richmond like WCE had to do for Kelly. The Richmond board are screaming for Richmond to get rid of him, so there’s no guarantees he would be better at Freo.
After the weekend I’ve even been a bit cold on Chad, but still attracted by his age and the friendships he already has.
If we secure Chad this trade period we won’t be left with much in our hand to use at the draft.