![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/fremantle.png)
How is he a direct replacement for Danger? Completely different players...He's a direct replacement for Danger.
Everyone else is a year older, and they're being carried by the older brigade.
Basically I don't expect them to get better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
How is he a direct replacement for Danger? Completely different players...He's a direct replacement for Danger.
Everyone else is a year older, and they're being carried by the older brigade.
Basically I don't expect them to get better.
They finished 12th last year sitting 5th today.He's a direct replacement for Danger.
Everyone else is a year older, and they're being carried by the older brigade.
Basically I don't expect them to get better.
Wants to play inside. Burst from stoppage mid (like danger at his best).How is he a direct replacement for Danger? Completely different players...
Couldn't agree more. If Sydney trade him this year they can get 3 firsts. If they wait til next year they just have to take what we have.Well if we’re throwing out favourable non realistic trades then sure.
I meant not chasing a ‘guaranteed’ top 3 pick for next year.
If we’re moving picks. Target a top 4 team from this year. Play on their thinking their future 1st value is low and hope. So, similar to what we did to get this year’s firsts. We must protect our downside.
IF Warner wants to come next year I don’t understand this belief we MUST find extra capital to satisfy. We’ll have our first and still a future first and he’s OOC. Those deals always get done.
But, yes, move a pick into next year but don’t chase someone’s perceived top 5 pick.
or essendonIf we’re talking hypotheticals here’s mine assuming Warner is off the table this year.
Pies (top 10) + ours (15-18) for Bolton + Richmond 2nd rounder.
Saints + Richmond 2nds to Carlton for their F1 so they can match bids for campo twins.
Keep Ports 1st for drafting best small available (Kako or Berry).
Offer our F2 for either Jones, Collard or Motlop.
If we’re going to death ride someone next year, I want it to be the blues, can’t stomach supporting them whenever they play Pies, Port or saints this year, plus I think they could drop with a harder fixture next year.
To get Bolton & Motlop this year and still have a 1st round pick this year and Blues 1st next year to offer Sydney on top of our own for Warner, I’d do that, We don’t really care where the blues 1st ends up as we’re giving it to Sydney anyway. It just takes our 2027 1st off the table.Pick #22, #25 and our F2 for Carlton's F1 and Motlop off your suggestion just a touch further down?
That is a terrible trade. Maybe 7 and 15 but it's still pretty crap imo.Lets say Collingwood completely shit the bed and finish 12th (pick 7)We finish top 4 (pick 15), and Port finish 9th (pick 11)
West Coast FF and current 2nd for 7 and 11?
We go to the draft with 15 and two seconds/
2025 WC FF and our second for Warner
We keep our own first.
If we don't have any other picks and Chad is out of contract then the futures 1sts will be fine because they're all we haveIn regards to trading picks two years in advance, I think it'll be pretty much useless for getting Warner at the end of 2025 tbh.
Two years from 2025 is obviously 2027 which happens to be the year before Tasmania is supposed to start. Until the AFL formally advise otherwise it can only be assumed that draft will be heavily compromised. I doubt very much that our 2027 first rounder would be valued by opposition clubs any higher than a second round pick is most years - any pick after that would be more or less useless in terms of trade value.
The eagles surely have learnt their lessonWC in 2022 made this trade in order to get better value from that best pick:
Rioli, Pick #2, Pick #40 for Pick #8, Pick #12, 2023 2nd round, 2023 3rd round
They've already made the trade of the future first for pick #8 and #12 just two years ago.
Well I'm reasonably sure Hasina's family lives in Perth and she frequented Perth nightclubs when she was younger, so make of that what you will....
Pretty sure it was pick two that year they traded not a future first.WC in 2022 made this trade in order to get better value from that best pick:
Rioli, Pick #2, Pick #40 for Pick #8, Pick #12, 2023 2nd round, 2023 3rd round
They've already made the trade of the future first for pick #8 and #12 just two years ago.
Couldn't agree more. If Sydney trade him this year they can get 3 firsts. If they wait til next year they just have to take what we have.
We'd likely still have our 2025 first rounder and 2026 first rounder to play with. The 2027 pick will be a long way from all we have and wouldn't be a significant part of any trade for a gun player - it'd be the final sweetener that gets the trade over the line at best.If we don't have any other picks and Chad is out of contract then the futures 1sts will be fine because they're all we have
But this year we’re a chance to have a couple of early-mid firsts. Next year they’re more likely to be lateIt will still probably be 2 x first rounders next year, so the deal Sydney are essentially coming to terms with is -
1 x first round pick OR a year of Chad (and also depriving a rival contender of Chad)
If I was in Sydney’s shoes, I’d still probably go with the Chad, but it’s almost a 50/50 decision
I know nothing about her but if she has people over here it makes a bit more sense. Why does everyone keep saying she's from VIC?Well I'm reasonably sure Hasina's family lives in Perth and she frequented Perth nightclubs when she was younger, so make of that what you will....
Pretty sure it was pick two that year they traded not a future first.
When you're expecting to make finals trading a future pick is risky enough - when you've just finished bottom four it's borderline stupidity.
I reckon if they win the flag we are some chance. Otherwise I agree we are pretty much no chance*.Sydney won't care if they get less (even much less) at the end of next year. They'd rather have a better shot at winning the 2025 flag (whether they win it this year or not).
To get the Chad this year, it would require Sydney having some other marquee target lined up that they can replace him with next year and wouldn't be able to get without the Warner picks and/or salary. I'm not sure such a player is out there. Zurharr doesn't count. It would have to be someone much better.
I also think the AFL will do whatever it takes to stop one of their favoured teams from losing a marquee player of the competition to a team the AFL head honchos consider irrelevant. They want the likes of Sydney, Carlton or Essendon winning flags. Not us.
Warner would be coming back partly for family reasons. Does he want to leave his little brother behind in Sydney? They are grown men, so it sounds silly, but it's one more reason for him to stay there another year. It's a complicating factor ... will Corey get delisted next year? Do Sydney try to keep Chad by extending Corey? Do we try to get both of them?
Quite a few obstacles stopping this happening in 2024.
I think you're agreeing with meWe'd likely still have our 2025 first rounder and 2026 first rounder to play with. The 2027 pick will be a long way from all we have and wouldn't be a significant part of any trade for a gun player - it'd be the final sweetener that gets the trade over the line at best.
I think you're agreeing with me
There's enough there with futures that we don't have to trade one of this year's forward