Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
They've got a second guy to match who might go late in the first round.Reckon the Lions have got Ashcroft covered with their first 4 picks - they'll likely trade out 27 and another pick when a pick comes in for Ashcroft, e.g., trade 27 to he Doggies for 35 and 48
They didn’t have enough list spots to go in to the draft with pick 66, so for all intents and purposes, those two picks were worth 146 points to them. By trading with us they have an extra 24 points available immediately, with a likely deal headed our way to split either 43 or 49 (depending on where an Ashcroft bid falls) for 52 and 55 on draft night to obtain more points for their academy prospect Marshall, who’s projected as an end of first round bid.The point from our point of view may be …
58 probably now ends up getting used for the Ashcroft bid.
And pick 59 probably gets used by the Swans to pick up their academy prospect Joel Ashcroft. Maybe we intend to force the Swans to match a bid on him and use up that pick?
And all that would mean that pick 58 and pick 60 end up effectively being the same pick. Which would mean that this pick swap means we effectively picked up 66 for nothing.
What I don’t get is what was in it for Brisbane? They’ve just swapped out 226 points and gotten 170 points back. Surely they need all the points they can get for Ashcroft? Unless there is something in the bidding that favours using fewer picks?
Love a Larkey, Waterman, Ryan, Andrews type with our late picks
Unless someones takes one of ash or markov, we won't have 4 spots I don't think. Atm we do, so undertandably people are selecting 4 for us, but think it'l be 3 players.
I would like to take the punt on Kerr, injury or not. Has big upside.
Pick 47. (Collingwood) – Thomas Sims
Northern Knights/Vic Metro – FWD, 199cm
Collingwood’s search for a key forward will lead them straight to Tom Sims, who made his forward presence felt through his contested marking capability and leading patterns inside 50, with a downside of inconsistency hitting the scoreboard.
Pick 50. (Collingwood) – Charlie Nicholls
Central District/South Australia – FWD, 197cm
The tall forward moves extremely well for his height, able to get into great spots with his leading patterns inside 50, and the ability to push higher up the ground and make use of his kicking in transition.
Pick 54. (Collingwood) – Hugh Boxshall
Claremont/Western Australia – MID, 188cm
Boxshall has generated some good interest off the back of strong combine testing, presenting well as an endurance-based midfield with some spark around the stoppage, and a tough body with his tackling pressure.
Pick 58. (Collingwood) – Sam Toner
Dandenong Stingrays/Vic Country – FWD, 184cm
The Narre-Warren local came into contention with a plethora of goal-scoring performances at local level, seeing him get the invite to Dandenong, where he turned it on yet again with a bag of five goals early in his Talent League career. Injury unfortunately brought an early end to 2024, but his upside is quite evident.
SEN's 2024 AFL full Phantom Draft
Draft expert Nathan Sepe makes his predictions for every selection in the 2024 AFL National Draft.www.sen.com.au
We won't pick 4 players though
Unless someones takes one of ash or markov, we won't have 4 spots I don't think. Atm we do, so undertandably people are selecting 4 for us, but think it'l be 3 players.
We are going a 36 and 6 listHow does that work? I count 4 …
Out:
Murphy (IIRC we’d already ‘replaced’ his spot at MSD by a rookie?)
Carmichael (r)
Noble
Richards
Begg (r)
Bytel (r)
Krueger
Eyre (r)
In:
Houston
Perryman
Membrey
Transfer:
Johnson -> r
Markov -> r
So that all means we’ve freed up 6 main list spots (Murphy, Noble, Richards, Krueger, Johnson and Markov), we’ve filled 3 already (Houston, Perryman, Membrey), leaving 3. But we can extend our main list from 36 to 37 to give us 4 we can fill in the draft, as long as we reduce our rookie count by 1 (ie from 8 to 7)
So on the rookie side we’ve gone from 4 out (Carmichael, Begg, Bytel and Eyre), we got one in at the MSD to replace Murphy’s spot (effectively Ned Long), leaving us 3. We spend two of those on Markov and Johnson, leaving us with one remaining - which remains vacant to allow us to draft 4 at the national draft and expand our senior list to 37.
Have I missed anything?
Love a Larkey, Waterman, Ryan, Andrews type with our late picks
We took 2 rookies at the midseason draft and kept them both this year. Long and Smit. Maybe that is how you miss-counted.How does that work? I count 4 …
Out:
Murphy (IIRC we’d already ‘replaced’ his spot at MSD by a rookie?)
Carmichael (r)
Noble
Richards
Begg (r)
Bytel (r)
Krueger
Eyre (r)
In:
Houston
Perryman
Membrey
Transfer:
Johnson -> r
Markov -> r
So that all means we’ve freed up 6 main list spots (Murphy, Noble, Richards, Krueger, Johnson and Markov), we’ve filled 3 already (Houston, Perryman, Membrey), leaving 3. But we can extend our main list from 36 to 37 to give us 4 we can fill in the draft, as long as we reduce our rookie count by 1 (ie from 8 to 7)
So on the rookie side we’ve gone from 4 out (Carmichael, Begg, Bytel and Eyre), we got one in at the MSD to replace Murphy’s spot (effectively Ned Long), leaving us 3. We spend two of those on Markov and Johnson, leaving us with one remaining - which remains vacant to allow us to draft 4 at the national draft and expand our senior list to 37.
Have I missed anything?
No but we have to pay them if no one else picks up their contract.Are we contractually obligated to pick up aj and/or markov if they are available in the rookie draft ?
We took 2 rookies at the midseason draft and kept them both this year. Long and Smit. Maybe that is how you miss-counted.
The talk was that was the way we were going to go, but we didn't in the end - we filled all vacancies last year when we took 3 in SSP.IIRC one of those spots had been vacant and we had saved it for the MSD?
Contractually obligated? No.Are we contractually obligated to pick up aj and/or markov if they are available in the rookie draft ?
We've also told them and the world that we're going to re-draft them.Contractually obligated? No.
But if we draft them, we save $100k (or thereabouts) off their contracts which we'd have to pay in full otherwise. They are probably not willing to turf them while contracted when doing so will cost them an additional $200k.
I guess if a player they weren't expecting to be available at their picks is suddenly there, they may change their mind and go with a 37 and 5 list strategy.Contractually obligated? No.
But if we draft them, we save $100k (or thereabouts) off their contracts which we'd have to pay in full otherwise. They are probably not willing to turf them while contracted when doing so will cost them an additional $200k.
No current season stats available
You can add Luke Kennedy to that list. He's one we do have a lot of interest inAFL Draft: ESPN's final, top 50 Power Rankings
The 2024 AFL Draft is rapidly approaching, with clubs finalising their preferences and making their decisions. Here's ESPN's extended, final Power Rankings for the class of 2024.www.espn.com.au
Sims @ #47
Not in top 50:
- Josh Dolan
- Charlie Nicholls
- Floyd Burmeister
- Charlie West
- Gabriel Stumpf
- Clancy Dennis
Get him Dekka. Looks classy and can run.You can add Luke Kennedy to that list. He's one we do have a lot of interest in
I'm a bit hesitant because he doesn't have a basketball background or is coming from non elite pathwaysGet him Dekka. Looks classy and can run.
AFL Draft: ESPN's final, top 50 Power Rankings
The 2024 AFL Draft is rapidly approaching, with clubs finalising their preferences and making their decisions. Here's ESPN's extended, final Power Rankings for the class of 2024.www.espn.com.au
Sims @ #47
Not in top 50:
- Josh Dolan
- Charlie Nicholls
- Floyd Burmeister
- Charlie West
- Gabriel Stumpf
- Clancy Dennis
- Luke Kennedy (Added for manicpie)