Preview 2024 National Draft Preview Thread

[The Nostradamus]

Well the issue now is that clubs know we can’t go just go to the draft with 2 and 62.

we can 2,62 and upgrade a rookie

that is allowed and would have no issue with that if we don't get the right offer (list spots tight anyway so not like we need to draft more)

yes it is unlikely but that shouldn't change our stance on pick 2 for 6 and 10/11 equivalent deals

 

[dazzledavey36]

Melbourne want Tauru

We want mids.

 

[verypoorboy]

We want mids.

I think you want mids, too.

 

[Ichiro #51]

My preference is to hold pick 2 until draft night and if Smith is there at 2, take him. I rate him as best player in the AFL level.

If the tigers select him at 1 I’d look to trade.

 

[Shermanator]

If FOS or Draper go pick 1, our phone will blow up with clubs trying to get Jagga with our pick..

 

[Shermanator]

My preference is to hold pick 2 until draft night and if Smith is there at 2, take him. I rate him as best player in the AFL level.

If the tigers select him at 1 I’d look to trade.

I was typing pretty much that as you posted this

 

[The Dingrel]

This will be interesting. Talls take time to develop and I think ideally we should look to trade in our F1 and split 2. If we could get 2 of Armstrong/Tauru/shanahan and best available small forward, worth doing.

 

[R00StaR]

we can 2,62 and upgrade a rookie

that is allowed and would have no issue with that if we don't get the right offer (list spots tight anyway so not like we need to draft more)

yes it is unlikely but that shouldn't change our stance on pick 2 for 6 and 10/11 equivalent deals

2 and 62 in a draft this deep, we're flipping morons of the highest order.

 

[the big lebowski]

we can 2,62 and upgrade a rookie

that is allowed and would have no issue with that if we don't get the right offer (list spots tight anyway so not like we need to draft more)

yes it is unlikely but that shouldn't change our stance on pick 2 for 6 and 10/11 equivalent deals

You’re making a lot of sense lately

 

[chubbspeterson]

62 will come in a fair way after F/S and academy hey?

It think it will come in 10 or so spots just based on Ashcroft, Kako, Marshall and Ben Campo bids.
I might have missed a few F/S and NGA's, can't seem to find a full list of them anywhere.

If Ashcroft bid at pick 1 (3000 pts less 20% disc. = 2400) - 27/34/42/43/49/60 (2451 pts)
If Ashcroft bid at pick 2 (2517 pts less 20% disc. = 2014) - 27/34/42/43 (2018 pts)
If Kako bid at pick 5 (1878 pts less 20% disc. = 1502) - 28/31/40 (1712 pts)
If Marshall bid on pick 23 (Twomey) (815 pts less 20% disc = 652) - 49/60/66 (513 pts)
If Marshall bid on pick 29 (ESPN) (653 pts less 20% = 522) - 49/60/66 (513 pts)
Campo twins bids (30-60 range) - 38 (Ben)? 63 (The other not as good one)
Barrett (Port NGA) - pick 50? Rookie?
Nguyen (Bombres NGA) - 53/54/65? Rookie?
Cole (Saints NGA) - 47? Rookie?