- Moderator
- #4,082
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I don't actually have favourites, more how I see kids transitioning to the next level
Clark has certainly been underwhelming at the next, just can't seem to get his hands on the pill, despite still never shirking a contest
Important year for him coming up, if he doesn't improve he might get cut
I think you've got FOS and SL too high in possessions, both should be 7's. Draper should be a 10 in separation from contest or FOS and SL should be 7's, Langford should be lower again. Draper is the best tackler of the lot, should be a 9. Lalor's endurance should probably be a 7. Also what alternative position could Harvey Langford play?
He'll be a freakish half forward midfielder or half back and then move into a centre bounce rotation and do ****ing well there too. Runs all day. Moves well just not 'fast', rarely second to the ball because he reads it faster.Also what alternative position could Harvey Langford play?
"Really not just the depth but the positional variety. And for us, we're clearly looking for some speed and some run and some key position depth behind the ball. So we'll get after that. We feel like there's some players that will be around the market we can bring into our footy club that can make a difference.”
- Nick Austin
Langford
FOS
Smith
Lalor
Draper
He doesn’t say it there I know but defs heard him say run and ball use when someone asked him going into the trade period what he was looking for."Really not just the depth but the positional variety. And for us, we're clearly looking for some speed and some run and some key position depth behind the ball. So we'll get after that. We feel like there's some players that will be around the market we can bring into our footy club that can make a difference.”
- Nick Austin
Langford
FOS
Smith
Lalor
Draper
I'm no expert but anyone else have the feeling that Langford is going to wind up the best player from this draft? I get we have a one-paced midfield and we really need to address that. But whoever ends up with him I think is going to really happy in a few years.
"Really not just the depth but the positional variety. And for us, we're clearly looking for some speed and some run and some key position depth behind the ball. So we'll get after that. We feel like there's some players that will be around the market we can bring into our footy club that can make a difference.”
- Nick Austin
Langford
FOS
Smith
Lalor
Draper
Interesting thing Juice is the quote below was from an interview on the last day of the combine, before the trade period.He doesn’t say it there I know but defs heard him say run and ball use when someone asked him going into the trade period what he was looking for.
Makes me think Jagga or fos
My FOS red flag is his lack of accumulation, just struggle to currently see him finding the ball 20+ times at AFL level if he struggles to do it at under 18's level.If we were to look back at Clark and see if there were any red flags at under 18 level,
I reckon they would be accumulation and bodysize for the role the plays. Also, lack of 2nd position if he cant make it as an onballer.
I think those are the things holding him back at AFL level at the moment. Sometimes the signs are obvious.
That said, it's still early days and while it's unlikely he becomes a star he could still be a decent player.
My FOS red flag is his lack of accumulation, just struggle to currently see him finding the ball 20+ times at AFL level if he struggles to do it at under 18's level.
Even Cripps as an unfit 17 year old could find the ball 30+ times.
FOS may have games where he gets 20+ possessions and you love him, then he will have those 10 possession games and you'll be annoyed.
Rayner in his draft year was the same, struggled to find the ball, but he was super explosive. He's never transitioned to an AFL midfielder and has been stuck as that explosive game changing forward.
LDU v Dow - LDU racked up possessions and Dow was an "explosive" inside midfielder. Dow ended up being limited in his AFL positions and limited in his ability to find the ball.
Smith - You know there is a high chance at AFL level he will find it 30+ times a game, the question for him is how damaging will those possessions be, Tom Mitchell levels or maybe Neale levels?
Yeah... when ur talking a top 3 pick we're not picking the best athlete, we're picking a gun footballer who also happens to match what we lack athletically.Prime examples of picking the best players rather than the best athlete
Not sure why you single out Knevitt, but expecting a big break out from the young Cat in 2025. Has been held back by their veterans and a couple of imports. Unlikely to be competing with Smith for a spot so should get opportunity.
All these players offer something we don’t have in the midfield. Speed should not be the defining quality. How many premiership teams have had elite speed in the midfield. Without doing the analysis WC team of Judd, Kerr and Cousins. Outside of that most premiership teams have not had overly pacey midfields. The defining quality would be aggression, ball use and leadership.
I can see a midfield of Cripps, Walsh and Langford. Throw in Cerra and E. Hollands to that mix with a young Ben Campo and Cody Walker on the horizon.
Kennedy is gone and Hewitt will become depth IMO
We can also target some more speed around the flanks which I see as more of a weakness. Austin may be targeting speed in these positions with later/ rookie picks.
I’m not against selecting any of the 5 names above. I do have a preference for the type of resilience, style and ball use that translates to the pressure big AFL games. I think Langford has this in spades
Yeah... when ur talking a top 3 pick we're not picking the best athlete, we're picking a gun footballer who also happens to match what we lack athletically.
You're an intelligent poster Arr0w, to suggest we'd be doing otherwise by not taking Langford is silly.
Smillie has performed almost just as well as Langford this year, but he doesn't cop a mention in here for good reason. Adding another 190+ slow midfielder to our mix would be utterly ludicrous.
Read something along the lines from a poster that knows a recruiter, he is the one that could be the slider on the night could drop as low as pick 15. Remarkable really he's got incredible forward craft to go along with his midfield evasiveness.I'm no expert but anyone else have the feeling that Langford is going to wind up the best player from this draft? I get we have a one-paced midfield and we really need to address that. But whoever ends up with him I think is going to really happy in a few years.
No I don't, and with the other options on offer no I wouldnt.The only reason I'd be taking Bont is because of what we know he has become later down the track.Would you classify Bontempelli as a slow midfielder? If you had the chance to draft a 18 year old Bont at pick 3 would you?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Would you classify Bontempelli as a slow midfielder? If you had the chance to draft a 18 year old Bont at pick 3 would you?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Smillie I thought was quickish.Yeah... when ur talking a top 3 pick we're not picking the best athlete, we're picking a gun footballer who also happens to match what we lack athletically.
You're an intelligent poster Arr0w, to suggest we'd be doing otherwise by not taking Langford is silly.
Smillie has performed almost just as well as Langford this year, but he doesn't cop a mention in here for good reason. Adding another 190+ slow midfielder to our mix would be utterly ludicrous.