Yes, but if every club took the Adelaide option then there wouldn't be any cheap options, only undeveloped state league options.There just isn’t the payoff for all the effort.
You can go the cheap option and get someone that does the job … or you can just cherry pick a good option from a club on the way down.
Trying to develop a single person to be the lead ruck is not something that appears to have worked too often - and even when it has, for no massive benefit.
It’s not like other positions where you can start as a forward and end up a backman … midfielder to half back … wing to forward pocket. It’s ruck or nothing.
Are there many examples that show otherwise? Where a player drafted as a ruck has become an important player in another role? I can’t think of one.
I’m in the Grant Thomas camp on this (and the named leadership group crap).
This is not a new discussion:
AFL ruckmen: overrated players, or overrated position?
Aaron Sandilands might be the most overrated player in football. Or he might just play in the most overrated position.www.theage.com.au
The cheap option thing only works while other clubs continue to draft and develop them for us to steal. If everyone stops drafting/developing them, like Adelaide has, then this option will disappear.
On SM-A5360 using BigFooty.com mobile app