List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

We made the rumour file (I know) on 3AW this morning. Rumour is that we will swap pick 2 with tiggers for 6 and 10 - deal today. Thats what was said.
Won't happen. We'll hold pick 2 on draft night, what happens from there who knows but I suspect it won't be traded and we'll use pick 2.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Pick 6 and 10 for 2? Done deal.
If that occurred, we'd suddenly see an influx of Tigers supporters claiming that they'll trade pick 2, but only for 2 top 10 draft picks.
 
Look, my judgment could be off here having literally never listened to the 3AW rumour file, but it seems like an unlikely source to be pinning our hopes on

Depends. If it’s actually Ross’ rumour, it’s probably above 50% chance. If it’s some random calling in, it’s about 0%.
 
I think you may have misinterpreted my argument. I'm arguing for keeping a strong draft hand for next year and addressing weaknesses in the list rather than spending future picks or wasting pick 2 on another high-end mid.
Picking a high end mid isn’t a waste.

Yes, we need kpps, but a) they need to be the right ones and b) be available in our range.

Our midfield is not the finished product by any means
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Our midfield is not the finished product by any means
Yeah because it's made up of players that are 25, 22, 22, 20, 20 and 19 years old. So one player in their prime and five in their first four years. All are first rounders and all but one are top five picks. The answer to our midfield isn't more top five picks it is time.
 
Yeah because it's made up of players that are 25, 22, 22, 20, 20 and 19 years old. So one player in their prime and five in their first four years. All are first rounders and all but one are top five picks. The answer to our midfield isn't more top five picks it is time.
No there are still spots to improve on . This will sound harsh whilst Scott, Simpkin are very good they can be improved on. Will is a wait and see and perhaps Powell might high fwd or back flanker sure McKercher might pop on the wing but there is spots for truly exceptional mids
 
I hope we retain pick 2 (but not reach for anyone) and then trade back into the first round somehow.
Best result (IMO) would be to get a good aggressive trade early into the first round with a future pick or two. Will mean clubs like the Tigers have to pony up or f off. If we managed a pick in that 3-10 range for a future pick or picks all of a sudden any perceived leverage for a 6/10 deal is gone.

FWIW I think 6/10 is an okay deal for us. I don't know if I'd be keen on much less than that and even then I'd want to be 100% sure and set on the player I was going to get with 6 at a minimum. Every draft is different, but I wouldn't be trading either Sheezel or McKercher for the 6 & 10 combo in either of their respective drafts as of today.
 
Picking a high end mid isn’t a waste.

Yes, we need kpps, but a) they need to be the right ones and b) be available in our range.

Our midfield is not the finished product by any means

This would the ninth draft in a row where we have used our first pick on a mid. Ninth!

Jy Simpkin is now 26. We haven't used our first pick on a tall since he has been at the club. How far beyond ridiculous do you think we should take it? If there aren't players we need in our range, just move the pick, like every other team does. Ironically, we actually had a pick this year perfectly positioned to take a tall, of course we traded it for the smallest bloke in the league.
 
So reports coming in that Brady is back from Shit Creek in his canoe with these updates.
  • The recruiting plot that was lost has been found.
  • The baby has been returned to the bathwater.
  • The Hymn sheet Clarko has been practicing his guitar on has been passed out to all the recruiting team
  • He has learnt his first magic trick and our opening pick in the 2024 draft will be………

Red Sox Magic Number GIF by NBC Sports Boston
 
Am I correct in thinking we used two picks (first rounds) on 2 tall KP last year?

One on a half back, one on a marking Forward and one on a top 3 mid/winger.

So then you add Wardlaw, Sheezel.

Lost JHF and TT.

Powell, Phillips.

Have we really gone hard on mids?
 
Am I correct in thinking we used two picks (first rounds) on 2 tall KP last year?

One on a half back, one on a marking Forward and one on a top 3 mid/winger.

So then you add Wardlaw, Sheezel.

Lost JHF and TT.

Powell, Phillips.

Have we really gone hard on mids?
Yes. Unless you ignore our first two picks in every recent draft.
 
I hope we retain pick 2 (but not reach for anyone) and then trade back into the first round somehow.
I'm happy to do this if we can trade back in with futures. I'd hate not to get Tauru, but happy if we managed a good key forward.

If we keep pick 2, who are you picking? I like the look of Langford. His highlights look exceptional and at 190cm. All our recent midfield draftees have been short.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top