List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part II

[Waynesworld]

View attachment 2095062
Rosas mum

 

[DocSholl]

That's their problem. As we are acutely aware - contracts mean nothing.

Well it's also our problem if we want him as bunching up lesser picks probably doesn't get it done.

 

[Better Loosen Up]

Richmond's list is gonna be ****ing dire. Will be a nice test to see if we can rise up the ladder before they assemble their troops in a few decades

Only temporarily. They still have a good bunch of experienced guys there that can drive the standards for the young draftees. This is where we are badly lacking. So Richmond's improvement curve could end up looking a lot more like Hawthorn's rather than ours.

 

[big_e]

To be fair, I'm pretty sure it was reported that we wanted 2 first round picks for Ben Brown.

Speaking of PTSD...

 

[Waynesworld]

Tom Morris reporting we're in the race for Houston

 

[krakouers]

View attachment 2095243

Oh no you don’t…

 

[Groucho]

According to Whately Kosi only wants to go to a South Australian team if traded. The dreaded homesickness

 

[koshari]

View attachment 2095243

The gif is back baby.....

 

[shinboner magic]

View attachment 2095194

So you’ve got this pic saved

Hmm you’ve got problems

 

[My Left Foote]

Twomey actually reported we were into him two weeks back on Gettable. Said we were more interested in trading futures for him.

Thanks giantroo that just reinforces my theory.

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

So you’ve got this pic saved

Hmm you’ve got problems

 

[Heaps of fun]

We might be well placed for Houston since we could turn #2 into two late firsts and some change.

Not many other clubs have the capital to get it done and since he's contracted that's crucial. He'll be back at Port, like Papley years back, if there's no deal.

Hypothetically, because picks will change, a deal like 2 and 22 to GC for 6, 13 and 20 could be great. We give 13 and 20 to Port for Houston and take Armstrong at 6. Points favour us but allows GC to get in before the Lombard deal.

Port get what they're asking for a contracted AA player, GC get two elite talents and we get a mature AA HB and a gun CHF.

Later on future trading can be used to grab someone like Gerreyn or Sims and we take River Stevens with our last pick.

 

[krakouers]

The gif is back baby.....

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

We might be well placed for Houston since we could turn #2 into two late firsts and some change.

Not many other clubs have the capital to get it done and since he's contracted that's crucial. He'll be back at Port, like Papley years back, if there's no deal.

Hypothetically, because picks will change, a deal like 2 and 22 to GC for 6, 13 and 20 could be great. We give 13 and 20 to Port for Houston and take Armstrong at 6. Points favour us but allows GC to get in before the Lombard deal.

Port get what they're asking for a contracted AA player, GC get two elite talents and we get a mature AA HB and a gun CHF.

Later on future trading can be used to grab someone like Gerreyn or Sims and we take River Stevens with our last pick.

Make it happen Eugene…

 

[Horizons_00]

I wish we could go for Pickett. Dan from Port would be good, but **** negotiating with them

 

[trooroo4life]

Perhaps this guy.

Jacob Konstanty Draft Profile

Gippsland Power forward Jacob Konstanty is a menacing tackler inside 50, with the speed and smarts to match as a goal kicker.

central.rookieme.com

Liked him in his draft year. Mentioned him a few times this year as one we could look at to fill the role. Hasn’t got a look in at the swans and had a few injuries, read he will resume training in the next fortnight from a foot injury. Some swans fans aren’t really high on him, but would be worth a shot if he moves on from the swans imo.

 

[giantroo]

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Liked him in his draft year. Mentioned him a few times this year as one we could look at to fill the role. Hasn’t got a look in at the swans and had a few injuries, read he will resume training in the next fortnight from a foot injury. Some swans fans aren’t really high on him, but would be worth a shot if he moves on from the swans imo.

I think he is suited to the defensive Mcreery role, while we pick up River and hopefully Rosas, gives us a decent small mix.

 

[Heaps of fun]

The gif is back baby.....

The gif baby is back.....

 

[Roo202]

It has been reported the Poorta want 2 1st round picks for Houston.

Too easy, Sleevo (pick 6) and Stephens (pick 5) for Houston, job done!

Could even re-list Paul Ahern (pick 7) and throw him in as well, picks 5,6 & 7, you're robbing us blind Port....

 

[backtothedraft]

Fantasy: Picket, Petracca, Lukosius, Houston

Reality: Seb Ross, Sam Day

12

Sam Day

Age

32

Ht

196cm

Wt

106kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

9.8

2star

K

5.2

2star

HB

4.6

3star

M

3.5

4star

T

1.8

4star

G

0.7

4star

D

8.0

2star

K

3.6

1star

HB

4.4

3star

M

1.9

2star

T

1.5

2star

G

0.9

4star

D

8.6

3star

K

3.2

2star

HB

5.4

4star

M

3.0

3star

T

0.8

3star

G

0.2

3star

 

[roos_tt29]

We might be well placed for Houston since we could turn #2 into two late firsts and some change.

Not many other clubs have the capital to get it done and since he's contracted that's crucial. He'll be back at Port, like Papley years back, if there's no deal.

Hypothetically, because picks will change, a deal like 2 and 22 to GC for 6, 13 and 20 could be great. We give 13 and 20 to Port for Houston and take Armstrong at 6. Points favour us but allows GC to get in before the Lombard deal.

Port get what they're asking for a contracted AA player, GC get two elite talents and we get a mature AA HB and a gun CHF.

Later on future trading can be used to grab someone like Gerreyn or Sims and we take River Stevens with our last pick.

I have a feeling we want Trainor in this draft and next year seems to have a larger pool of keys at the top end, so wonder if a future first is thrown in in some capacity...

 

[giantroo]

 

[Better Loosen Up]

TBH, i'm not really keen on Houston. I think he's going to cost us too much in draft capital and we are already developing enough of his type with Goater, Archer and Hardeman. I don't think Houston addresses our most important need which is leadership as I see him as more of a foot soldier and not the sort of player that regularly stands up when the chips are down.

Not interested in Petracca either for a number of reasons. Not only will he cost us too much in draft capital, his contract is huge $ wise. Coming back from a serious injury that he's had, I think it would be reasonable to assume that he won't be the player he was. If he comes back at say 80% of what he was, then that basically brings him back to the pack of average midfielders that would command a 600k contract, not 1.2M - 1.7M. Sure he brings leadership, but at the expense I just mentioned, it's not worth the risk.

Our biggest issue without a doubt, as I just touched on, is leadership. A lot of us on here are calling for Sheezel, Xerri or Larkey to be made Captain but to be honest, none of these guys know what leadership in a finals competitive side looks like. Anything they've learnt from LMac or Simpkin needs to be thrown in the bin. So the only 2 ways to address this is to get the right players into our club and make them captain immediately (a Parker or Ward type) for example and have our 3 guys in the leadership group learning from them. If we can't get a straight up captain like Parker or Ward, and have to rely on a combination of Sheezel, Larkey and Xerri as Captains/ Vice Captains, then we need to bring in a retired captain to the club like a Selwood or Cotchin for example, who can work part time/ full time with these guys and give them proper direction in an off-field role.

But regardless of who we bring in to our club right now, if we don't address the leadership vacuum, our current on-field situation won't be changing in a hurry.

Edit: Lastly, Leading Teams or whoever they are, can FRO!

 

[New_Roo]

We might be well placed for Houston since we could turn #2 into two late firsts and some change.

Not many other clubs have the capital to get it done and since he's contracted that's crucial. He'll be back at Port, like Papley years back, if there's no deal.

Hypothetically, because picks will change, a deal like 2 and 22 to GC for 6, 13 and 20 could be great. We give 13 and 20 to Port for Houston and take Armstrong at 6. Points favour us but allows GC to get in before the Lombard deal.

Port get what they're asking for a contracted AA player, GC get two elite talents and we get a mature AA HB and a gun CHF.

Later on future trading can be used to grab someone like Gerreyn or Sims and we take River Stevens with our last pick.

GC need 6 and/or 13 for Rioli though


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com