![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/north_melbourne.png)
- Nov 14, 2010
- 44,182
- 49,078
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Lukosious dropped
Go and get him
Go and get him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And be nice to get one back on the tarpsWould be a handy pick up.
WCE 1st on the table for an established player (Bolton?) or are they wanting multiple 1sts?Two things I've heard on good authority:
- wce first rounder on the table
- for the first time ever north are an absolute fortress when it comes to drafting and trading. No one knows what our plans are.
They only want picks. No interest in players.WCE 1st on the table for an established player (Bolton?) or are they wanting multiple 1sts?
That's just it. We're not at the trade for final pieces stage of the build. Two more drafts at a minimum is needed just to replace Teakle/Pink/Tucker/Stephens/Hansen Jnr from our side on the weekend in a few years time.
The cautionary tale is the Crows and Saints in thinking their list was ready to contend when it lacked talent.
If you can make some acquisitions like the Hawks (Scrimshaw etc.) that don't cost much draft capital and can give us 5-7 years then sure that would be great, but jury is out to whether we get any bites this year of players wanting to come to us.
Taking at least 3-4 picks to the draft in such a deep draft makes sense to me.
If next year's draft isn't as deep then you start looking at mature players end of 2025.
Shut up.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
They will want a kings ransom to make up for blowing their draft capital in previous couple of years.You can imagine what they're going to ask for way overs i would reckon.
They want to trade pick 3, but only if they get picks 4 and 5 back...WCE 1st on the table for an established player (Bolton?) or are they wanting multiple 1sts?
Lukosious dropped
Go and get him
Indeed. Darling would have to come basically free trade wise. You're not trading for what he was.
He's has a couple of decent games, largely he's been putrid.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
I'd like him but not holding my breath
Is already half way out the door.
Doesn’t suit Dimma’s game style with the up and back small forwards.
He is a great kick and that alone, would be a big plus to solve our woeful inside 50 conversion rate…
Don’t know know where he would fit with Zurhaar, PC, Duursma, Larkey, but we know how much Clarko values good ball users and Lukosious would have to be in the top 10% in the AFL, even though he has had a poor year.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
WC pick 3(atm) could be dangled in front of GC for picks 6 and 12 to get a pick in before the Lombard bid and gives the Eagles exactly what they need, multiple throws at the stumps not single pick 1,2 or 3s esp this year being so even and there next pick being in the mid 20s. I agree with Montagna that they haven't even hit rock bottom yet and it could get potentially real ugly when Tasmania comes in and takes everything, makes sense all roundTwo things I've heard on good authority:
- wce first rounder on the table
- for the first time ever north are an absolute fortress when it comes to drafting and trading. No one knows what our plans are.
I’m not sure either but he’d be best 22 every week. Could play instead of Pink for a start and has flexibility to play in some different roles. Duursma also unlikely to play 22 games next year tooIs already half way out the door.
Doesn’t suit Dimma’s game style with the up and back small forwards.
He is a great kick and that alone, would be a big plus to solve our woeful inside 50 conversion rate…
Don’t know know where he would fit with Zurhaar, PC, Duursma, Larkey, but we know how much Clarko values good ball users and Lukosious would have to be in the top 10% in the AFL, even though he has had a poor year.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Lukosious dropped
Go and get him
I’m not sure either but he’d be best 22 every week. Could play instead of Pink for a start and has flexibility to play in some different roles. Duursma also unlikely to play 22 games next year too
They will want a kings ransom to make up for blowing their draft capital in previous couple of years.
Freo have what would’ve been their pick 16 from 23 draft trade…..
Their first live pick is 36….which will be pushed back
Followed by 54
That’s it…..boy are they stuffed….and clubs know it…..they might play hardball with him if no one is willing to pay any outrageous demands they put fwd…this could get interesting….
Lukosious is 195cm and still only 23 years old.
For all of our faults as a team, ball use is still one of the main issues in preventing us from capitalising on a dominant midfield and also protecting an inexperienced defence from woeful turnovers.
We are last in the AFL in scores from turnovers and are also last for inside 50 efficiency, something Lukosious would immediately improve.
What would he cost? Future second?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
GC would surely want more than that. Around pick 15 or two secondsLukosious is 195cm and still only 23 years old.
For all of our faults as a team, ball use is still one of the main issues in preventing us from capitalising on a dominant midfield and also protecting an inexperienced defence from woeful turnovers.
We are last in the AFL in scores from turnovers and are also last for inside 50 efficiency, something Lukosious would immediately improve.
What would he cost? Future second?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com