I don’t think he’s going anywhere either.
But I think the same for all our 30+ players.
30 isn't old anymore.
it was in the 80/90's but not now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I don’t think he’s going anywhere either.
But I think the same for all our 30+ players.
I'd do big Mason, Reef and our future 1st for CP, I reckon.
(If we could fit the incoming salary dump within our cap, that is)
... might even be prepared to give away a 3rd-rounder
30 isn't old anymore.
it was in the 80/90's but not now.
I'll be surprised if we keep all of Long, Sullivan and Bytel and I won't be surprised if we don't keep any of them.With Carmy and Beggy gone that evens up our rookie list with 6 unless they delist someone else.
Dean
Eyre
Smit
Long
Sullivan
Bytel
Murphy's spot is one senior list spot available.
Shame we delisted Begg - could have thrown him in to seal the deal.I'd trade (efa) big Mason, Reef and our future 1st for CP, I reckon.
(If we could fit the incoming salary dump within our cap, that is)
... might even be prepared to give away a 3rd-rounder (and AJ, if they'd have him)
You have better intel than me. I have no idea how they all lay.Checkers won't be moving on. We haven't even had a season with Checkers & McStay together yet, which we may fi ally get in 2025
As for any others, they're all contracted as far as I'm aware & laying well. If they planned to retire, they'd have said so before now.
Jolly felt 35 and lost his spot to a nineteen year old tbfIt was also at Collingwood in the 2010’s.
For example …
Dane Swan retired at 32.
Chris Tarrant retired at 32.
Darren Jolly retired at 31.
Nick Maxwell retired at 31.
Alan Didak retired at 30.
Luke Ball retired at 30.
Travis Cloke retired (from Bulldogs) at 30.
Haha. Typo. Playing, not layingYou have better intel than me. I have no idea how they all lay.
Thoughts on fiorini? With nobles trade could maybe grab him for free as part of it for an upgraded pick from GC. No superstar but he’s an upgrade on them you’d thinkI'll be surprised if we keep all of Long, Sullivan and Bytel and I won't be surprised if we don't keep any of them.
They're state league standard depth and don't look likely to become more than that. We can get that any time from the SSP. Go again and try to find ones with a bit more upside.
It was also at Collingwood in the 2010’s.
For example …
Dane Swan retired at 32.
Chris Tarrant retired at 32.
Darren Jolly retired at 31.
Nick Maxwell retired at 31.
Alan Didak retired at 30.
Luke Ball retired at 30.
Travis Cloke retired (from Bulldogs) at 30.
I'll be surprised if we keep all of Long, Sullivan and Bytel and I won't be surprised if we don't keep any of them.
They're state league standard depth and don't look likely to become more than that. We can get that any time from the SSP. Go again and try to find ones with a bit more upside.
You're catastrophising. Those players are worth more to us playing than their cap space at the moment. When they retire we pool that money and bring in an experienced, elite player or two to fill the void—meanwhile, young leaders get more experience under their wing.I believe at least one or two of the most senior players should retire this year. I thought Steele would, but he wants to go on. I don't see anyone else retiring either.
This will create an issue where we lose a heap of players at once and the younger players coming in without much exposure. Every senior player going on next year, could create years of pain in a few years. Given the fact that we haven't done well in drafts for years (giving away top picks) it's going to have bigger repercussions.
Salary cap space to trade for or recruit key position player or two will get hindered as well.
By retaining all of them, younger players are not getting the opportunities and then we will lose all of them at once creating a huge vacuum. We've traditionally compromised our list for short term benefits which hasn't always borne fruit. Except for most of the father-son drafts, our draft record has not been very good. We've given up a lot on trades as well by trying to somehow get the trade done at any cost.You're catastrophising. Those players are worth more to us playing than their cap space at the moment. When they retire we pool that money and bring in an experienced, elite player or two to fill the void—meanwhile, young leaders get more experience under their wing.
If there is one thing we missed this year, it wasn't Ginni. His replacement adequately covered his goal production and far surpassed him on the pressure side of things.By retaining all of them, younger players are not getting the opportunities and then we will lose all of them at once creating a huge vacuum. We've traditionally compromised our list for short term benefits which hasn't always borne fruit. Except for most of the father-son drafts, our draft record has not been very good. We've given up a lot on trades as well by trying to somehow get the trade done at any cost.
Whatever we say about Ginni, he used to give us a spark and drive which we have lacked this year. Hawks now, play with similar spark like we used to in the first two years of Fly. It all helps in getting the best out of everyone.
It was also at Collingwood in the 2010’s.
For example …
Dane Swan retired at 32.
Chris Tarrant retired at 32.
Darren Jolly retired at 31.
Nick Maxwell retired at 31.
Alan Didak retired at 30.
Luke Ball retired at 30.
Travis Cloke retired (from Bulldogs) at 30.
Jack Ginnivan? Really?By retaining all of them, younger players are not getting the opportunities and then we will lose all of them at once creating a huge vacuum. We've traditionally compromised our list for short term benefits which hasn't always borne fruit. Except for most of the father-son drafts, our draft record has not been very good. We've given up a lot on trades as well by trying to somehow get the trade done at any cost.
Whatever we say about Ginni, he used to give us a spark and drive which we have lacked this year. Hawks now, play with similar spark like we used to in the first two years of Fly. It all helps in getting the best out of everyone.
Apart from pressure I didn't see much of an improvement. Ginni had the X factor and the infectious exuberance that lifted the team. Schultz more often than not, missed goals at crucial times which would have given us some momentum (late in the Lions game being the only exception I can remember). Ginni used to kick those.If there is one thing we missed this year, it wasn't Ginni. His replacement adequately covered his goal production and far surpassed him on the pressure side of things.
Your initial point wasn't about the trades. But now it turns out you are another one of them.Apart from pressure I didn't see much of an improvement. Ginni had the X factor and the infectious exuberance that lifted the team. Schultz more often than not, missed goals at crucial times which would have given us some momentum (late in the Lions game being the only exception I can remember). Ginni used to kick those.
Some valid arguments here https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...e-ginnivan-trade-cost-collingwood-finals/amp/
30 isn't old anymore.
it was in the 80/90's but not now.
… Whatever we say about Ginni, he used to give us a spark and drive …
In: Lynch and Petracca
Out: Noble and Reef