I'm not sold on Johnson but he's getting wickets.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did the lbw hit his pad? Or miss everything?
Close, would have been tough to give that out live.
EDIT: Apparently I don't understand legspin. Commentators reckon that's hitting.
Isn't the rule that if the ball hits the pad on the full, umpires have to assume the ball does not deviate from its line? So whether it was going to spin is irrelevant?Close, would have been tough to give that out live.
EDIT: Apparently I don't understand legspin. Commentators reckon that's hitting.
Isn't the rule that if the ball hits the pad on the full, umpires have to assume the ball does not deviate from its line? So whether it was going to spin is irrelevant?
Would honestly give MoM to Matt Short, no one besides him or JFM have looked close to reaching the boundary
Would honestly give MoM to Matt Short, no one besides him or JFM have looked close to reaching the boundary
It’s called context of the match situation. No batsmen has looked close to clearing the boundary outside of Short and JFM. It will probably go to Bartlett or Johnson, but that 50 off 3.1 overs will prove to the the difference in this match.Bartlett and easily. No bat deserves a MOTM when you make 146. You aren’t getting a MOTM making 32 either
Close, would have been tough to give that out live.
EDIT: Apparently I don't understand legspin. Commentators reckon that's hitting.
What? 4 overs and then the pitch became impossible to bat on?They did get the easiest batting conditions to be fair. Johnson probably MOTM if he picks up a 4th, likewise Bartlett if he gets another 1 or 2.
What? 4 overs and then the pitch became impossible to bat on?