Do you truly believe it was just a 'bad night'
Cmon now!!
I do. we match up well on Adelaide but tonight nothing went right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Do you truly believe it was just a 'bad night'
Cmon now!!
But he's right. He's a flog if you've read his other posts but what's wrong with it when he's right?Yeah, not sure why our mods are tolerating this shit to be honest.
Are we doing an mvp.
Need to sleep before i forget this season
Sloane's a wide-eyed grub.Interesting with Sloane-have always thought he was a clean ball player. Am revisiting that concept.
Hes not...so lets resort too abusing fellow and opposition supporters then hey.
There is s correlation of class and passionHe has....
Not faulting his passion for the club tho...he just steps over the line occasionally...
Surely that's a suspension? The ball wasn't in dispute, Danger had the ball. Sloane could have tackled or bumped and he chose to bump. He collected Danger high and knocked him out.Interesting with Sloane-have always thought he was a clean ball player. Am revisiting that concept.
I do. we match up well on Adelaide but tonight nothing went right.
I'm not making excuses for him either. He doesn't need to have any made for him, in my perspective his output was good example the one on three he won in the middle of the ground. 34 touches at 76.5% efficiency, 10 tackles, 1 goal which should have been 2 if Menzel had looked around before the half time siren. That to me is extremely serviceable in any game.I'm not here for excuses. The players shouldn't be either, but I can't change what I seen.
He has....
Not faulting his passion for the club tho...he just steps over the line occasionally...
I do. we match up well on Adelaide but tonight nothing went right.
Ranking points don't tell much of a story for players who have a negating role. Bews had a great game, one of the few. Joel tried hard, endeavour was great, but didn't have his usual impact and hasn't since his injury.Joel had a mare? We were watching different games obviously. Oh and Bews was the lowest ranked player on the ground.
There are 22 players out there playing those finals. Believe me, I wish it were as simple as sacking the coach. If that were true we could easily replace Scott and this list would magically start winning final after final. You should actually be hoping its the coach because having it be the players is a FAR worse and longer process to fix.Lets just accept 3-8 in finals and move on to next year. Wow !
Between that and Blicavs broken leg for an off the ball tackle (why does nobody ever mention this?)
Coming to the losing side's board and repeatedly asserting that we lost because we are overachievers who lack talent. Can't see how that would be a problem.But he's right. He's a flog if you've read his other posts but what's wrong with it when he's right?
And the first quarter? re-watch it when the game was lost.I'm not making excuses for him either. He doesn't need to have any made for him, in my perspective his output was good example the one on three he won in the middle of the ground. 34 touches at 76.5% efficiency, 10 tackles, 1 goal which should have been 2 if Menzel had looked around before the half time siren. That to me is extremely serviceable in any game.
Dream Team maybe. Champion Data had him 14th. He was putrid in every possible way tonight Menegola.
Didn't even warrant a free apparently, so suspension seems unlikely. Lousy.Surely that's a suspension? The ball wasn't in dispute, Danger had the ball. Sloane could have tackled or bumped and he chose to bump. He collected Danger high and knocked him out.
No doubt Danger will do the right thing by his mate, unlike Kreuzer, so he's probably going to get a first class 'didn't hurt, I was fine' statement. But to be consistent across the year, and for some of the laughable suspensions Cats players get, then Sloane has to get some sort of sanction.
Its a sledge disguised as a complimentThat's got more backhand than Sloane's effort on Danger's head.
Surely that's a suspension? The ball wasn't in dispute, Danger had the ball. Sloane could have tackled or bumped and he chose to bump. He collected Danger high and knocked him out.
No doubt Danger will do the right thing by his mate, unlike Kreuzer, so he's probably going to get a first class 'didn't hurt, I was fine' statement. But to be consistent across the year, and for some of the laughable suspensions Cats players get, then Sloane has to get some sort of sanction.
Your views about Selwood are bad and you should feel bad.And the first quarter? re-watch it when the game was lost.
Yeah, but you're uglyIts a sledge disguised as a compliment