The King!
Chosen One
Rampe on fyfe will give me nightmares
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
As do I. You guys are right in this mateLol thought we were stuffed i was happy we fought back
Sorry about the ump sooking mid game i get a bit tense
As do I. You guys are right in this mate
Not enough to get you to the big one though, was it?And yet we beat them all last year
Nope. Swans a seriously good side, Not a matter of easing off the gas, but rather some bastard taking control of the car.Was that lack of respect by Freo? They ease the gas like last week, except they nearly blew it against a good team this time.
You can't be serious.freo looking alright..would be nice to see them play a top 4 team away though.
Not much to think IMO. You guys showed a lot of guts as did we. It's bloody round 4! This fight is gonna continue all year. Fight on my friend!Not sure what to think but think both fans have to love the effort at the end of the night, us to fightback
Then freo to lift and win after it and that start all over us
Fyfe...heck me 4 swans cant even tackle him
Or a player diving to stop the incoming ball hit the post.The camera wiggled, surely that means it came off the post?
And yet we beat them all last year
I agree with the umpiring, all freo in the first half, then all swans in the 2ndDisgusting how much the umpiring influenced the match. By no means only in favour of Freo, the first half the umpires were wearing purple but the second half was all Swans, and it showed in just how much it influenced the momentum. Wouldn't be surprised if somebody tapped them on the shoulder at half time and they over-corrected.
In any case, can't argue Freo didn't deserve the win. It's just a shame the match wasn't allowed to unfold on its own terms.
Also, I keep forgetting just how ridiculously good Nat Fyfe is. The guy is a beast. Jesus Christ.
Nah sydney were on fire, we couldnt keep up.Was that lack of respect by Freo? They ease the gas like last week, except they nearly blew it against a good team this time.
One win away from the GF plus the gratitude of the football community for ending the drug cheats season. So it ended quite well.
They just reviewed the umpire review on Fox. Video shows the boundary umpire that overruled the Bird goal call had his head behind the post and was standing behind the boundary line. There is no way he could possibly have had a line of sight on the ball. He made up what he "saw". Likewise, the touched on the line review saw a boundary umpire charge in saying it was touched. He too had no direct line of sight and was behind the goal line. Final one was the "poster". Commentators still convinced there was nothing but leg on the ball. Will be interesting to see the commentary on this being a non-Vic match.
Well, that's a bit frustrating.They just reviewed the umpire review on Fox. Video shows the boundary umpire that overruled the Bird goal call had his head behind the post and was standing behind the boundary line. There is no way he could possibly have had a line of sight on the ball. He made up what he "saw". Likewise, the touched on the line review saw a boundary umpire charge in saying it was touched. He too had no direct line of sight and was behind the goal line. Final one was the "poster". Commentators still convinced there was nothing but leg on the ball. Will be interesting to see the commentary on this being a non-Vic match.
Netflix/ Kids/ Frozen/ Let It GoThey just reviewed the umpire review on Fox. Video shows the boundary umpire that overruled the Bird goal call had his head behind the post and was standing behind the boundary line. There is no way he could possibly have had a line of sight on the ball. He made up what he "saw". Likewise, the touched on the line review saw a boundary umpire charge in saying it was touched. He too had no direct line of sight and was behind the goal line. Final one was the "poster". Commentators still convinced there was nothing but leg on the ball. Will be interesting to see the commentary on this being a non-Vic match.