AFL 2019 Round 10: St Kilda v Carlton, 3:20pm AEST Marvel

Who will win?

  • St Kilda < 10 pts

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • St Kilda 10 - 30 pts

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • St Kilda > 30 pts

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • Carlton < 10 pts

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Carlton 10 - 30 pts

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • Carlton > 30 pts

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • Draw

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Saints just in it with the rub of the green, will be interesting when they start to square the ledger up
Sometimes the square up never comes, see vs Collingwood. Mind you, the free count hasn't stopped us from leading in these sorts of games... We still make shit mistakes. Would be nice if the whistle came a bit quicker when we're the tackler though...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Got him high, was extremely unlucky, if it wasn’t the hip to the head it would’ve been play on, but are you going to sook and squeal about the goal you got from silvagni holding marsh on the goal line so he couldn’t touch it?? Probably not

Yeah probably not, but that's mostly because you have the last 14 free kicks, filled with dubious decisions. Derp.
 
How do they allow someone they know is 110% biased towards one side to umpire a game involving that club, he is probably 10-0 saints way by himself.

May as well let Eddie umpire every pies game.
Fisher should NOT umpire St Kilda games.

For conflict of interest to be a problem, it only has to be perceived. In other words, Fisher may or may not be biased, but there only has to be the appearance that he may be biased for there to be an issue.
 
Fisher should NOT umpire St Kilda games.

For conflict of interest to be a problem, it only has to be perceived. In other words, Fisher may or may not be biased, but there only has to be the appearance that he may be biased for there to be an issue.

Persecution complex.

Just keep looking for boogie men, I'm sure you'll find one eventually.
 
So you’re saying - in direct response to being called cheats ... they actually cheat.

?

we all know that, but they have feelings. :D
I'd like to know how you'd react to being called one for simply doing your job. It's natural for them to respond this way.

and while it keeps on getting ignored at AFL house, it'll only get worse.
 
Fisher should NOT umpire St Kilda games.

For conflict of interest to be a problem, it only has to be perceived. In other words, Fisher may or may not be biased, but there only has to be the appearance that he may be biased for there to be an issue.
He is biased, even if he is trying not to be it's on a subconscious level.

I agree he shouldn't be out there
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Persecution complex.

Just keep looking for boogie men, I'm sure you'll find one eventually.
You clearly know nothing about the concept of conflict of interest.

Address the point - if you can. Otherwise head off to Bay 13.
 
You clearly know nothing about the concept of conflict of interest.

Address the point - if you can. Otherwise head off to Bay 13.

And you can head off to the Scandals and Rumours board and complain a bit more about why you can't get free kicks.
 
should be a lesson for players not to go calling umpires cheats, weather or not he was right or wrong. this has been a direct response to that.

The direct response to the umpires taking offense to one of our players calling a boundary umpire a cheat is for the umpires to cheat? Interesting theory.
 
How many of them did Leigh Fisher pay?

Exact numbers, please.

Or else I'll just assume you're a bit emotional and have no clue what you're on about.
I'm not one eyed enough to think he payed them all you fool. But did stkilda not break one rule that whole quarter? Not one slipped tackle high? No one holding the man?

You lose all credibility if you reckon st Kilda had a perfect quarter.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL 2019 Round 10: St Kilda v Carlton, 3:20pm AEST Marvel

Back
Top