- Apr 29, 2016
- 13,512
- 11,855
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
I'm talking specifically about the kick after the 3/4 time siren. That was the correct call.It was, the umpiring has been terrible. It’s always what they don’t pay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'm talking specifically about the kick after the 3/4 time siren. That was the correct call.It was, the umpiring has been terrible. It’s always what they don’t pay.
Yeah to be fair, I'm not there live. On tv, it was close but not that close.I think you'll find it wasn't, not live.
huh? It was the correct call. the kick was after the siren.
I'm talking specifically about the kick after the 3/4 time siren. That was the correct call.
Firstly - The siren went before the ball made contact with the foot.
Microseconds?1. You’re quoting an older post
2. She has zero ******* idea if it was she was downfield. And if it was kicked after the siren from the replay we’re talking about microseconds.
It should have been reviewed.
Port can complain about the umpiring all they want, but they really should be flogging a bottom 3 team (on paper) in what Richmond have fielded this afternoon (with from all the kids/inexperienced players perspective I may add)
Not a good form line heading into September for Port Adelaide
Just needs "noise of affirmation" in there.anyone else playing at home?
Well he took a bounce when he being tackled which should've been holding the ball so some calls go his way. It wasn't a big tackle but the letter of the law says its holding the ball.Don’t disagree. JHF gets umpired differently I’m sure of it.
At homePort can complain about the umpiring all they want, but they really should be flogging a bottom 3 team (on paper) in what Richmond have fielded this afternoon (with from all the kids/inexperienced players perspective I may add)
Not a good form line heading into September for Port Adelaide
I think that's the old rule. Pretty sure it's been changed to when the umpire hears the siren.Firstly - The siren went before the ball made contact with the foot.
Secondly - Doesnt the rule state the quarter ends when the fu signals an end to the quarter?
So even if the siren did go before or after the kick, it does not matter, and it's a goal either way as no fu signalled an end to the quarter.?
but the review would've showed that it was after the siren.1. You’re quoting an older post
2. She has zero ******* idea if it was she was downfield. And if it was kicked after the siren from the replay we’re talking about microseconds.
It should have been reviewed.
At home
but the review would've showed that it was after the siren.
They’re genuinely that bad.Hard to tell if Port are genuinely this bad or if they tanking this one off to ensure they play Collingwood for the qualifying final instead of Brisbane at the Gabba
Hard to tell if Port are genuinely this bad or if they tanking this one off to ensure they play Collingwood for the qualifying final instead of Brisbane at the Gabba
They have absolutely no interest in winning this !Hard to tell if Port are genuinely this bad or if they tanking this one off to ensure they play Collingwood for the qualifying final instead of Brisbane at the Gabba