Autopsy AFL Round 19 - Another Loss

Remove this Banner Ad

Sam Mitchell is a must get for 2020.

Hand him an open cheque to take over as a midfield coach with a promise he'll take over when Buck's gets the sack
Sam Mitchell would be a fantastic replacement for Rob Harvey whom I would think will be at the Saints next year as an assistant. I would definitely have Sam in mind as Bucks successor if we continue our slump long term and a rebuild was to be imminent.
 
Not so good.
I haven't given up yet. Not until it is mathematically impossible or if players needed won't make it time.

For mine the final 8 is just like a season starting up all over again and anything can happen.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I haven't given up yet. Not until it is mathematically impossible or if players needed won't make it time.

For mine the final 8 is just like a season starting up all over again and anything can happen.
You’re the voice of reason Maggie
 
CP - is clearly the stat always quoted for effort - always.
So no point trying to disparage it.

When people try to speak of poor effort when we won CP just shows they have NFI.
You didn't answer my questions. Forget what the stats say. Which team looked to you like they were hungrier, harder at it, more committed and winning the contest for the football? We withered like little petals in that first qtr again spinny. Not for the first time this year we were badly exposed in this regard.
 
Blaming injuries is a cop out when most players on the list have gone backwards by a fair margain.

Only Aish and Brown have really improved. Crisp, Maynard, Grundy and Pendlebury the same as 2018 or thereabouts. Missed a few probably but point is majority of the players on the list are going backwards.

Grundy better then Last Year

Ton of Players gone Backwards.

Top of my Head a few that :

- Cox
- WHE
- Thomas
- Maybe
- Sier
 
I haven't given up yet. Not until it is mathematically impossible or if players needed won't make it time.

For mine the final 8 is just like a season starting up all over again and anything can happen.

IF we keep getting Injuries we might not be able to Field a Team or even a Competitive one
 
You didn't answer my questions. Forget what the stats say. Which team looked to you like they were hungrier, harder at it, more committed and winning the contest for the football? We withered like little petals in that first qtr again spinny. Not for the first time this year we were badly exposed in this regard.

Agree about 1st QTR - clearly out played.
To still win CP after that point shows effort was not lacking for the rest of the game as others are contending.
We allowed them a 6 point increase to their 1st QTR lead - that takes effort.

Injuries are costing us and lack of cohesion due to instability in our 22 is compromising confidence.
I like many see a fierce rebound as players return - maybe playing more games in finals if we miss top 4, assists these returning players get some form and building team momentum.

Effort is not an issue.
 
Hopefully Roughy is all good. My sister does tats for him and he is always a nice bloke.

Probably one of the more embarrassing ways to end a night.
 
Agree about 1st QTR - clearly out played.
To still win CP after that point shows effort was not lacking for the rest of the game as others are contending.
We allowed them a 6 point increase to their 1st QTR lead - that takes effort.

Injuries are costing us and lack of cohesion due to instability in our 22 is compromising confidence.
I like many see a fierce rebound as players return - maybe playing more games in finals if we miss top 4, assists these returning players get some form and building team momentum.

Effort is not an issue.
So we kept running after we withered when they brought the heat. I think you should also take into account that the Tigers just treaded water after the first.
Continuing to run and make an effort is one thing. But lack of hardness in the face of physicality is another thing all together. It's part of effort and it's what cost us the game when it was wet and hard. It is a big issue for us ATM.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I haven't given up yet. Not until it is mathematically impossible or if players needed won't make it time.

For mine the final 8 is just like a season starting up all over again and anything can happen.

History will show you pretty much need to finish top 3 to win the flag, barring a miracle.

We aren't good enough to win 4 finals in a row against WCE Geelong Richmond and someone else
 
History will show you pretty much need to finish top 3 to win the flag, barring a miracle.

Teams are Quite Close so I can see a Chance a Team outside Top 4 could win the Flag
 
Right, so effort is SOLELY measured by contested possession.

Its almost like, the game has so many more facets - weird how I missed it.

:drunk:

Yes - you missed it.
Give me any example where commentary on lack of effort was NOT based on a very poor differential in CP.

It doesn’t happen.

Should have checked the stats LP before generalizing.
 
Yes - you missed it.
Give me any example where commentary on lack of effort was NOT based on a very poor differential in CP.

It doesn’t happen.

Should have checked the stats LP before generalizing.
I do check the stats, Spinny, being a numbers man I like either re-enforcing what I've seen, or possibly looking at things in a different way based on the data.

We lost; Clearances, Inside 50's, Tackles & overall Disposals

4 huge indicators, which coupled with Contested Possession - paint a broader picture. The effort was poor, especially when you consider we again came out sluggish off the back of an awful performance the week prior.
 
Yes - you missed it.
Give me any example where commentary on lack of effort was NOT based on a very poor differential in CP.

It doesn’t happen.

Should have checked the stats LP before generalizing.

Glenn McFarlane article in the hun today highlighted uncontested possession differential as an indicator of poor work rate, so I guess there’s an example.

But effort takes many forms a lot doesn’t make the stat sheet such as pushing back to help out the defence or making dummy leads to shift zones, running to provide options etc then there’s work without ball in hand such as tackling.

Using contested possessions as the sole indicator of effort is problematic at best.
 
I do check the stats, Spinny, being a numbers man I like either re-enforcing what I've seen, or possibly looking at things in a different way based on the data.

We lost; Clearances, Inside 50's, Tackles & overall Disposals

4 huge indicators, which coupled with Contested Possession - paint a broader picture. The effort was poor, especially when you consider we again came out sluggish off the back of an awful performance the week prior.

AFL website has clearances 33:33, but stoppage clearance ( more contested v center clearances) to us 26:18.

Tackles 50:59 to Rich
No one considers your other stats as effort stats compared to those I’ve quoted.

Now considering how badly we were beaten in the 1QTR to have then won or broken even on these stats took EFFORT. As clearly evidenced by us only allowing them a 6 point margin increase over the remaining 3 QTRs. That also takes effort.
At QTR time most in the match day thread most were predicting a shellacking - but the boys kept things respectable. With EFFORT.
 
AFL website has clearances 33:33, but stoppage clearance ( more contested v center clearances) to us 26:18.

Tackles 50:59 to Rich
No one considers your other stats as effort stats compared to those I’ve quoted.

Now considering how badly we were beaten in the 1QTR to have then won or broken even on these stats took EFFORT. As clearly evidenced by us only allowing them a 6 point margin increase over the remaining 3 QTRs. That also takes effort.
At QTR time most in the match day thread most were predicting a shellacking - but the boys kept things respectable. With EFFORT.
Inside 50's are an effort stat, as plenty of it is based on spread.

Its seemingly a moot point though, the post quarter time narrative doesn't fly - as the game was essentially over.

It'd be nice to come out firing, with you know, intent & EFFORT considering how bad our recent performance against GWS was.
 
Glenn McFarlane article in the hun today highlighted uncontested possession differential as an indicator of poor work rate, so I guess there’s an example.

But effort takes many forms a lot doesn’t make the stat sheet such as pushing back to help out the defence or making dummy leads to shift zones, running to provide options etc then there’s work without ball in hand such as tackling.

Using contested possessions as the sole indicator of effort is problematic at best.

Sorry - find me a single commentator when bagging effort that doesn’t go to CP as the primary stat - it doesn’t happen.
Uncontested differential of 14 is not huge enough to make a case - 30 or 40 maybe.
 
Inside 50's are an effort stat, as plenty of it is based on spread.

Its seemingly a moot point though, the post quarter time narrative doesn't fly - as the game was essentially over.

It'd be nice to come out firing, with you know, intent & EFFORT considering how bad our recent performance against GWS was.

Yes - 1QTR effort was bad.

But why are you discounting the arm wrestle later - surely you also thought we’d get blown away at QTR time.

Do you think Hardwick would be happy at this failure to smash us given the players we’re missing?
 
Yes - 1QTR effort was bad.

But why are you discounting the arm wrestle later - surely you also thought we’d get blown away at QTR time.

Do you think Hardwick would be happy at this failure to smash us given the players we’re missing?
I would consider not winning a quarter, until the last (won it by 6), as essentially being blown away - yes.

Hardwick would be very content, I'm sure. They were 50+ points up in the last, and we pinched a few cheap ones late.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy AFL Round 19 - Another Loss

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top