Yet Khawaja has always been a flat track bully and is 35. It’s a poor decision.I’d easily back Khawaja over Head it’s not close. Honestly give me 1 selection I like come on you can have the opener I don’t want
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet Khawaja has always been a flat track bully and is 35. It’s a poor decision.I’d easily back Khawaja over Head it’s not close. Honestly give me 1 selection I like come on you can have the opener I don’t want
Yet Khawaja has always been a flat track bully and is 35. It’s a poor decision.
The UAE isn’t the subcontinent for a start, secondly his Asian record isn’t strong he has always struggled thereKhawaja is a smart decision. We all know we are winning this Ashes, but we want to build a team here that can take us through next year as well, Khawaja played one of the best innings I've seen in the SC and he seems to be out of the slump he had a few years ago.
It's obviously his last chance, Head will get plenty more chances.
Yes and this will be a flat trackYet Khawaja has always been a flat track bully and is 35. It’s a poor decision.
Last ashes here the track was flat and both Marsh’s did better than himYes and this will be a flat track
We need runs at home against an average team, despite his flaw i think Usman can give us that. Head? Eh
The UAE isn’t the subcontinent for a start, secondly his Asian record isn’t strong he has always struggled there
Yeah and that was a few years ago, i am not saying he is a great option. I would love to look elsewhere but at his best he can get the job done. Head i am not sure aboutLast ashes here the track was flat and both Marsh’s did better than him
I wanted Khawaja in the team but in place of Harris.
My preferred XI (which I know won't happen)
Khawaja, Warner, Labuschagne, Smith, Head, Green, Inglis, Richardson, Cummins, Lyon, Hazlewood
He is the biggest flat track bully going, out scoring Smith in one series doesn’t change thatHe's barely gotten opportunities in those conditions. In Sri Lanka he was dropped while the likes of Voges and Burns got more chances, he finally got a proper go and produced something brilliant against the Pakistan spinners.
Your argument that he's a flat track bully is also false, he out performed Smith in a series against South Africa a few years ago when literally everyone but him was failing in touch conditions against Rabada and co.
I think he was rightly dropped last time due to poor form, but he deserves a last chance.
Swepson got smashed in the tour game which didn't help him get selectedSwepson had a case to replace Lyon but injured his neck. No other spinner warranted being looked at. Starc should have been dropped we agree on that at least
At some point though you have to give the batsmen some time to find their feet all the top performers in the shield had played test cricket. So you would be dropping someone to go back to someone else who you have already judged to have failed at the level. Green was the dominant batsmen in the shield and did force his was into the team
I agree with picking Lyon over him. By the time it was apparent that Lyon was struggling with his form at test level Swepson was injured. They would definitely be my spin combo for Asia butSwepson got smashed in the tour game which didn't help him get selected
This too. Although Green should be at 5.
I agree with picking Lyon over him. By the time it was apparent that Lyon was struggling with his form at test level Swepson was injured. They would definitely be my spin combo for Asia but
To be fair to Head with the bowling attack SA have had the last couple of years, he could be Bradman and they still wouldn't be winning gamesKhawaja over Head is the right call but not one I expected them to make. I really like Trav but I thought Ed Cowan absolutely nailed it the other day on ABC.
"my only question mark on Travis Head is that he is a hundred scorer, but he doesn't score match winning hundreds. If he did, South Australia wouldn't be coming last every year in the Sheffield Shield. Usman is a match winner. When he gets runs, he gets the hard runs."
To be fair to Head with the bowling attack SA have had the last couple of years, he could be Bradman and they still wouldn't be winning games
Khawaja bats in the best FC batting line up in Australia. When was the last time he won Qld a game with the bat?Khawaja over Head is the right call but not one I expected them to make. I really like Trav but I thought Ed Cowan absolutely nailed it the other day on ABC.
"my only question mark on Travis Head is that he is a hundred scorer, but he doesn't score match winning hundreds. If he did, South Australia wouldn't be coming last every year in the Sheffield Shield. Usman is a match winner. When he gets runs, he gets the hard runs."
I think Trav has a long term future in the Test side, admittedly part of the allure for me is his leadership possibilities, of which we are bereft of. But at this point in time, Trav is still making ordinary mistakes leading to dismissals. This Summer, I think Usman is the better option.
Richardson over Starc is a dream that unfortunately won't become reality, at least not early on anyway.
Green is undoubtedly the great white hope for Australian cricket, but his current Test record suggests he isn't a number four yet. Having him come in at 6 under (hopefully) less scoreboard pressure is ideal. The other thing that goes against him at 4 is he could be facing the third ball of an innings. As his bowling workload increases, that's putting too much on his shoulders.i'm genuinely baffled why Green is batting at 6. He is a top order batsman. He bats at 4 at state level. He bats too slowly when he starts and tends to make alot of runs from boundaries. None of that works for a number 6. He should bat at 5 and someone like Head (who plays his shots) should be batting at 6. Position 6 has always been the more aggressive batsman.
i'm genuinely baffled why Green is batting at 6. He is a top order batsman. He bats at 4 at state level. He bats too slowly when he starts and tends to make alot of runs from boundaries. None of that works for a number 6. He should bat at 5 and someone like Head (who plays his shots) should be batting at 6. Position 6 has always been the more aggressive batsman.
But that contradicts the point of being a match winner as that was Qlds first lose this year and worst performance in yearsshould be more draws though. Ed Cowan is on the money as usual.
The runs Usman got against WA in the first innings got him the gig i'm guessing. 70 when the team got 129 is a good effort.
Green is undoubtedly the great white hope for Australian cricket, but his current Test record suggests he isn't a number four yet. Having him come in at 6 under (hopefully) less scoreboard pressure is ideal. The other thing that goes against him at 4 is he could be facing the third ball of an innings. As his bowling workload increases, that's putting too much on his shoulders.
He may do but we will need a second spinner. Seeings Labuschange out bowled Holland last time we were in Asia I can’t see Holland getting picked againI like Swepson but i suspect he will get smashed in asia. I'd liek to see him playing the next ashes series.
He may do but we will need a second spinner. Seeings Labuschange out bowled Holland last time we were in Asia I can’t see Holland getting picked again