But never dominated over the competition at any point unlike Brisbane, Essendon 2000, geelong in 2007 and 2011 or even briefly collingwood 2011 and saints of 2009. They never had the aura of brilliance.
Brisbane dominated the comp? Lolz
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But never dominated over the competition at any point unlike Brisbane, Essendon 2000, geelong in 2007 and 2011 or even briefly collingwood 2011 and saints of 2009. They never had the aura of brilliance.
We will take their 3-peat then. Interested to hear from Hawks & Lions fans what their "Best of 3-peat" teams would look like. And may as well throw in Geelong for good measure given they win 3 in 5 years.
Look up Melbourne 1954-1964 then consider editing your post.
Edit:
Actually, I'll save you the effort:
1954 - Grand Final (Runners Up)
1955 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1956 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1957 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1958 - Grand Final (Runners Up)
1959 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1960 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1961 - Third
1962 - Fourth
1963 - Third
1964 - Grand Final (Premiers)
Look up Melbourne 1954-1964 then consider editing your post.
Edit:
Actually, I'll save you the effort:
1954 - Grand Final (Runners Up)
1955 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1956 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1957 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1958 - Grand Final (Runners Up)
1959 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1960 - Grand Final (Premiers)
1961 - Third
1962 - Fourth
1963 - Third
1964 - Grand Final (Premiers)
This to me me is a much bigger factor than 4 extra home and away wins over 4 years.Home-ground advantage is a significant factor. You've beaten all interstate sides at your homeground, Brisbane beat both Essendon and Collingwood at their home-ground. Unless Hawthorn win again this year then I'd say it'd be neck and neck or brisbane on top due to that factor. I am biased however.
This really isn't complicated.
1. The aim if the competition is to win the flag
2. Since 2000 Hawks have played in 4 grand finals and won 3.
3. No one has matched that.
Shall we move on now
Teach me to post half alseep. ApologiesUmmm....
That's ridiculous reasoning. Port were a stronger option then west coast last year and the saints and pies put together two of the strongest seasons in modern times. the Hawks premiership teams weren't as good as those saints and pies teams at their peaks. Hawthorn on the other hand have only beaten interstate teams in their 3 year run and west coast and Freo were very weak gf sides. In the bottom five of the past twenty years along with carlton 99, Melbourne 2001 and pies of 2004. Sydney was a stronger side but choked even worse then port did. Atleast port rocked up for the first twenty minutes.Geelong a clear 3rd for me. '07 there really wasn't any other decent teams, so kind of won by default. Definitely deserving, easily the best team of the year. And Saints of that decade were terribly soft mentally, so don't rate that one highly either. Collingwood is the premiership I respect the most.
Brisbane were definitely something to fear, had some top end talent that eclipsed almost any list. Essendon was a good scalp, a respected team fresh off a premiership the year before. Collingwood never really stood a chance, good but not premiership material.
Hawks have apparently faced the greatest defensive team of all time, the greatest forward line ever and a game plan that couldn't be bettered.
Hawks for me... As if I'd say anything else.
You do realise that geelong achieved exactly the same flags, runners up and prelim finishes in their 5 year run as well. Except instead of 13 all Australians they had 29 as well as a Host of records such as most home ground wins in a row, biggest grand final win, most all Australians in a season, most 150 point wins in a season and a number of others.Hawthorn 2011 - present
1 prelim
1 runners up
3 flags
13 all aust players
always has been top 4
There really is nothing more to it than that. 4 is greater than 3. Everything else is purely subjective, and the debate can go round and around for ever and ever (and has been).This really isn't complicated.
1. The aim if the competition is to win the flag
2. Since 2000 Hawks have played in 5 grand finals and won 4
3. No one has matched that.
Shall we move on now
Edit: what was I thinkin
far more Geelong and, interestingly, Melbourne supporters so farThis will always end in a Hawks circle-jerk. Might as well close the thread now.
I would have Guera over Duryea any day of the week, but that is some sort of ridiculous team on paper. Would love to see the cats and Lions equivalent. The Lions would be something else I thinkHere's my team I've knocked up in five minutes:
B: Ben Stratton, Brian Lake, Josh Gibson
HB: Shaun Burgoyne, James Frawley, Grant Birchall
C: Bradley Hill, Sam Mitchell, Isaac Smith
HF: Luke Breust, Lance Franklin, Cyril Rioli
F: Paul Puopolo, Jarryd Roughead, Jack Gunston
Foll: David Hale, Luke Hodge, Jordan Lewis
I/C: Liam Shiels, Taylor Duryea, Matthew Suckling, Ben McEvoy
Omitted from the team: Jonathan Simpkin, Matthew Spangher, Will Langford, Ryan Schoenmakers, Brad Sewell, Max Bailey, Brent Guerra
I would have Guera over Duryea any day of the week, but that is some sort of ridiculous team on paper. Would love to see the cats and Lions equivalent. The Lions would be something else I think
You do realise that geelong achieved exactly the same flags, runners up and prelim finishes in their 5 year run as well. Except instead of 13 all Australians they had 29 as well as a Host of records such as most home ground wins in a row, biggest grand final win, most all Australians in a season, most 150 point wins in a season and a number of others.
There are criteria that you can use that makes the Hawks sound a better team so why come up with criteria that makes them look inferior?
It's more to do with the fact that Goo played in only one of the three-peat flags, whereas Duryea has played in two.
Double standards given I've included Franklin, but I personally think (no matter what Jonathan Brown thinks) that Franklin is the best player in the competition, so how could I omit the Big Bopper?
Additionally, Goo has a dead animal on the top of his head, while the Doc's hair is frabjous. That counts in Doc's favour.