We do now after the phone call.
I really can't see us going after Bennell with his past . We skipped on Garlett because of his problems. Hope I'm wrong and and we go after Bennell he has some serious talent .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
We do now after the phone call.
Do we actually have any interest in Bennell
Is a problem that we just cant attract a star and every single player battle versus shitpies we get pantsed, from Mason cox, greenwood, adams, , trelor, none chose us, and I believe no chance at flags untill we get more talent,in my 35 years as a member is almost impossible with 18 sides to build premier ship with out stealing a star or two.
us,hawks and saints leading the race apparently
Just because I say we should strongly consider getting Treloar does not mean we need to pay him 750K to get him.
Like I said in another post I do not know who is on what and like most I probably do not agree completely with the valuations of some and many within our own list.
Having said that I think Treloar in particular at this particular time is a very valuable commodity not to be underestimated. He is almost a game changer for list management in terms of the list pecking order for the emerging teams in the next 6 years or so taking into account his age given what has happened in the AFL with GWS and GCS over the last 7 years or so.
I do not want us to over pay for anyone but at the same time some players have merit and command special consideration given other considerations such as the environment within the league.
I am happy for us not to pay 750K but it would be good to get him and if it mean't others got a salary boost so be it.
As I said before IMO, in terms of quality and opportunity cost, I would rather Treloar at 750K than Bennell and Redden at $1million because the 250K cannot be underestimated in getting something else like a Weller or whoever.
750K for Treloar seems cheap compared to Boyd for example
Disagree completely. Premierships are won with the teams with the best bottom 6. They are the players who don't hold structures well, have poorer disposal which invariably leads to turnovers and goals. Our top 6 have been as good as anyone's for a while now. We have been slowly improving the bottom 6 for several years and hence our improvement.Actually it is not crap. Its hard to remember since it has been a while we where good enough to make a GF.
Better players win finals not the bottom six. Better players attract value substitutes to replace the lessor lights to.
Remember Swans targeted good players mainly, as did the Hawks after getting Hodge, and then the 2004 crew. From there they traded and Geelong had how many AA's?
some reporter might of been scoop not 100% on it tho.Where is that from?
Seems to be a lot of unclear rumours about Bennell so far... One report says hawks in the lead and the next says they've back off, heard similar about Essendon. Only things i've seen with us is a few people (Emma Quayle, Foxsports) saying he could be a good get for us and take us close to flag.
Anyway I have long said Bennell and Redden would be a superior offseason to Treloar.
Not going there allegedly.Isnt Bennel from Pinjarra like Macintosh
surely hel go back to Wa
Was under the impression Hawthorn made it clear that they are out of the race?us,hawks and saints leading the race apparently
I'd have this bloke on our list
Just because I say we should strongly consider getting Treloar does not mean we need to pay him 750K to get him.
Like I said in another post I do not know who is on what and like most I probably do not agree completely with the valuations of some and many within our own list.
Having said that I think Treloar in particular at this particular time is a very valuable commodity not to be underestimated. He is almost a game changer for list management in terms of the list pecking order for the emerging teams in the next 6 years or so taking into account his age given what has happened in the AFL with GWS and GCS over the last 7 years or so.
I do not want us to over pay for anyone but at the same time some players have merit and command special consideration given other considerations such as the environment within the league.
I am happy for us not to pay 750K but it would be good to get him and if it mean't others got a salary boost so be it.
As I said before IMO, in terms of quality and opportunity cost, I would rather Treloar at 750K than Bennell and Redden at $1million because the 250K cannot be underestimated in getting something else like a Weller or whoever.
750K for Treloar seems cheap compared to Boyd for example
Hampson isn't on 400k, around 280kBullshit!
Matt White @ $330k per year = zero compensation
Matthew Kreuzer @$450k per year = ???
James Frawley @ $600k per year = 1st round pick
If the AFL screw over the Lions on an average salary for a ruckman then it will be an absolute joke.
Shaun Hampson is on $400k, anyone think he'd get close to a 1st rounder?
$450k should get an end of 1st round selection at most
Shaun Higgins is probably getting paid around that amount and he only got the Bulldogs a 2nd rounder
and yes, I understand that there is more to it than just salary, but Kreuzer doesn't have AA selections, amazing B&F results or anything other than he was a former #1 pick. Even Higgins went at Pick 11 which is pretty high.
What would it take to get Harley?
hawks will get himthink we are the best club suited for bennel to be honest. have the indigenous centre at punt road,dream time at the g,chocco Williams and have experience managing dusty