Bluemour Discussion Thread IX

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Listening to the weekly podcast. Excellent discussion and some valid points about selections and non selections. Yet people on this forum will defend the MC.

Also some interesting analysis on our team selection when playing teams we should be a chance against and the state of our fitness levels after the previous weeks big effort for Simmos 300th.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Mate of mine with pretty good mail on selections (usually gets the changes 24-48 hours before announced and almost always spot on) reckons that Harry is unlikely for this week again, with Levi instead preferred to get the call up for Phillips, who's out for the season with that hammy injury.

With the seconds not playing from the bye, the MC may prefer Levi as the experience body, but I'm still in the 'play Harry' camp.

Hope I'm proven wrong come this evening.
 
Mate of mine with pretty good mail on selections (usually gets the changes 24-48 hours before announced and almost always spot on) reckons that Harry is unlikely for this week again, with Levi instead preferred to get the call up for Phillips, who's out for the season with that hammy injury.

With the seconds not playing from the bye, the MC may prefer Levi as the experience body, but I'm still in the 'play Harry' camp.

Hope I'm proven wrong come this evening.

I get McKay hasn't been great in the vfl so I understand MC reason for leaving him out.

But god dam Levi has been plain useless the last few games he's played...hes offered nothing.

I'd even prefer Kerr.
 
Blokes who did shit by instinct didn't know why they were good. The skills don't translate.

Small defenders get a good feel for tactics because they're immediately thrown into needing to understand what the best forward pockets will do, the positions they'll want to get to, and what not to do. Don't kick across goals, don't let your man get goalside, and don't ever let him get loose from you.

Defensive mids do exactly the same thing, just they're relied upon to understand even more; how and when to leave their man, when to go the ball or the man, where to stand based on the ruck/midfielder distribution and where your man is standing, etc.

The best players need to know the game instinctively. Defensive players need to understand the game and know where to be almost before the good players get there. The first one is the kind of skill you kill for in a player. The second skill set is a good primer into becoming a coach.
This is really interesting. I never really gave the subject any thought. After reading your post, though, I would have thought that these defensive players you mentioned would have the potential to be great line coaches. Obviously there are other factors. A senior coach though, needs to be able to weave these three lines together to form a coherent game plan. They also need to be a communicator, like it or not, for the sake of media and stakeholders. Plus a little intelligence along with a few other attributes.

And I imagine that it happens the other way around, with a senior coach saying, "Hey, we're going to be defined by pressure so we're going to be playing like Sydney has for the past 10 years". He gives the parameters. We're playing a spare in defense, and only one ruck.

They then put together their lines structures to meet those requirements. This might be, for example, directing forwards to push up really high to help lock the opposition ball into our forward half, at the expense of risking easy goals out the back. Could be our mids playing tight at the expense of not being able to break away on turnovers, and getting stuck moving the ball slowly into our forward line. Or the exact opposite, with our guys trying so hard to create overlap that they don't lock down their opponent and it puts too much pressure on our defense with easy entries.

So in our case, we've had to focus on stopping the bleeding, so despite the earlier directive to play an attacking, attractive brand of football, we've crawled back into a defensive mindset to prevent results like Brisbane occurring every week.

in 2018, the 2 players I wanted to see the most (apart from new recruits) was Pickett and Williamson. With Doc going down pre-season, it looked like Williamson was going to get a lot of game time, preparing us well for a post Simpson world. That didn't really work out. I'm not interested in the media drivel. I think that next year will be quite different to what most in the media will expect. I'll be first in queue to renew my membership.

This is the rubbish you get when I type before my second coffee...apologies to all....

GO BLUES
 
What is McViegh going to teach Young forwards?

We have Simmo and Doc as mentors for the backline.

It's not just about positional stuff - he's a senior player from what is widely considered one of the strongest club cultures in the last decade.

If he can help to instil the attitudes and behaviours that have kept Sydney up the top of the ladder for so long, that would be extremely valuable. He's also still playing good football, and is flexible enough to be used down back, on a wing, or up forward.
 
What makes you believe lecras will be a good teacher?

The main thing we need to fix in the forward line is to get Harry up and about which imo will happen next year. The smaller forwards will learn to crumb and apply pressure more effectively once this happens. But all this requires a well functioning midfiel group to get the ball there and we can maintain a structure that is more balanced in terms of offense and defense.

What makes you think McVeigh would be?

Your second point is 100% correct.

My issue is this.
RUMOUR: we are in Mark LeCras ear to come and help in a hodge-type situation, for our young forwards.

I've underlined the important bits for the Melb based blues fans who seem incapable of understanding what this relatively straight forward collection of words might mean.

We just got poleaxed by a team who had Hodge (who last year was considered cooked) playing a pivotal role as a defender.
If any of the pumpkin headed Melb based brethren watched that game you would know that we actually WON the inside 50 count. True story.

Now, to us non-Victorian types, we might (just might) see that as an issue that could need rectifying. Gee, how would someone (from outside Victoria obviously) handle that task? (it's a tough tough question) . How about we get well credentialed veteran forward from an organisation that has a very good functioning forward line.

Non-Victorians "Brilliant!!!! Now find us a some candidates"
Victorian Blues fans: " Dunno, sounds kind of stoopid"

ONE CANDIDATE :
Mark LeCras.
31 Years Old
209 games
400+ Goals
One of the best kicks in the comp.
Having his best season in 5 before injuring his wrist.
Was playing in the best forward set up in the comp prior to Darling, Kennedy and himself being injured.

Non-Victorians: "I think he might add something" " Country kid from WA like Cripps, Pickett, Fish, SPS" "He's well known for his professional preparation" " Has coaching ambitions" " Elite user of the ball". "Certainly worth considering", "better than Shaw and O'Shea"

Victorian Blues Fans: " I want a 34 year old back man from Sydney". "What would he know about forwards?" "I'll quit the club if we get that guy"


Seriously, they just saved a soccer team from a cave in Thailand, we need to save a club from hole in Melb. I wonder if those divers are busy.
 
Mate of mine with pretty good mail on selections (usually gets the changes 24-48 hours before announced and almost always spot on) reckons that Harry is unlikely for this week again, with Levi instead preferred to get the call up for Phillips, who's out for the season with that hammy injury.

With the seconds not playing from the bye, the MC may prefer Levi as the experience body, but I'm still in the 'play Harry' camp.

Hope I'm proven wrong come this evening.
Looks like the manure truck might be ordered after all.BF posters will lose their minds tonight.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Looks like the manure truck might be ordered after all.BF posters will lose their minds tonight.

Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

Bring McKay in and it looks like caving to media pressure.
Bring Casboult in and the pressure builds more for the following week.

What the club needs is a big performance from Harry, something we can hold up and go "Hey, here's what we've been waiting to see, a four-quarter, 5-goal VFL performance, Harry has shown he understands what it required and he'll be selected this week".
 
This is really interesting. I never really gave the subject any thought. After reading your post, though, I would have thought that these defensive players you mentioned would have the potential to be great line coaches. Obviously there are other factors. A senior coach though, needs to be able to weave these three lines together to form a coherent game plan. They also need to be a communicator, like it or not, for the sake of media and stakeholders. Plus a little intelligence along with a few other attributes.

I definitely think there's a history of many successful coaches not being "the most talented" players, but rather ones who had to understand the game, graft and work extremely hard to make it at the top level. Of course it's not a one-size-fits-all answer, but you can imagine a player of the dominant brilliance of, say, Wayne Carey, struggling to get his message across to the less talented. He'd say "just leap into the pack, take the mark, play on and dob it from 55m!" and the poor shmo would go "uhh... sure YOU could do that, there, Wayno, but..." Or a Gary Ablett Snr could do things NOBODY else could, but likewise it wasn't a plan or preparation or thinking that enabled him to do it - it was pure talent, not something you can teach.

Look around the AFL and you have Clarkson, Goodwin, the Scotts, Hardwick, Richardson, Pyke, Simpson, etc..... all of course were very good footballers, but none were really freak talents or "brilliant". They all "got the most out of themselves" and did well through competitiveness, combativeness, preparation and smarts. Those are messages that can be taught, and apply for everyone from the most talented down to the least on the list.
 
What the club needs is a big performance from Harry, something we can hold up and go "Hey, here's what we've been waiting to see, a four-quarter, 5-goal VFL performance, Harry has shown he understands what it required and he'll be selected this week".

There is no way McKay should be selected after last week's performance. No goals, no contested marks, no pressure acts, he was a virtual spectator.
 
with Levi instead preferred

Keep rolling out the big fella... One day he will kick 8 straight and we will all have egg on our faces...

Fortunately it will be for Wodonga Bulldogs in the Ovens and Murray league... big turn up for those on the VB cans
 
Seriously, they just saved a soccer team from a cave in Thailand, we need to save a club from hole in Melb. I wonder if those divers are busy.
3am - wakes, sits up, looks around in the dark, smirks........."that's brilliant - I'm using it on BF...........shut those idiot easterners up." 3.05 - sleeps.
 
3am - wakes, sits up, looks around in the dark, smirks........."that's brilliant - I'm using it on BF...........shut those idiot easterners up." 3.05 - sleeps.
8.05 am.

It was either the English soccer team or the Thai kids.

(May or may not be my actual face)
images
 
3am - wakes, sits up, looks around in the dark, smirks........."that's brilliant - I'm using it on BF...........shut those idiot easterners up." 3.05 - sleeps.

To be fair, though, those Thai U12 kids would have out-spread and worked our team last weekend. :-D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top