Bluemour Discussion Thread XVIII - Please Sir, Can We Have More?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

If the new rules suggest that GWS can now match Hawthorn's offer, Hawks may be less inclined to trade 2 first rounders and may not see the trade worth it. Whereas Carlton's offer remains much higher and will not be matched. Might have a foot in the door with this one. Who knows..?


I don’t think it’s new rules though is it? It seems crazy that you would ever have had to match the exact payment every single year of the contract as payments within teams change all the time.
 
Can't see GWS getting anywhere our offer to Cogs, unless, they cut other very good talent

Which might turn out to be a very smart Plan B for us..
 
I'm reserving judgement until we actually see all these very good mature players that are breaking down the doors to get to us.

Makes it easier if one adopts the attitude that any decent trade in is a super bonus rather than anything else....give it a couple of years and the age group you are pointing at will all be there - naturally grown up together...

can only control what we can control.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don’t think it’s new rules though is it? It seems crazy that you would ever have had to match the exact payment every single year of the contract as payments within teams change all the time.
They're just saying that ... on average ... you have to be within the salary cap. Pfft, we've known that for years!
 
I don’t think it’s new rules though is it? It seems crazy that you would ever have had to match the exact payment every single year of the contract as payments within teams change all the time.
I posted an screenshot of an article from I think 2012 that pretty much shows this rule so I don’t think it’s anything new. Maybe it’s just one of those things people think and say so often that it somehow becomes fact.
 
I didn't get a chance to read bigfooty today.

Here's a rundown for ya fb..

So first, news that Giants don't need to match front loaded offer. KingCharles be like..

dcg6.gif

Then it was mentioned Martin was probably headed to the Dogs.. ole KC was all..

tumblr_mm681qNocA1qfrw7to1_400.gif

Then it was revealed Papley was only 50/50 and KingCharlie

gffg.gif

Then some poster from the Hawks Board called Tyler Soze or Keyser Durdin said Cogs chose Hawks.. Charlie didnt handle it well..

fffg7.gif

A few of us told him to calm down. Then the news that the sum of our trading week would net us the grand prize of Ellis got too much..

ccf87.gif

And that's about it mate..
 
Docherty was the best defender in his position in the league before he got injured.

Ellis is a horrible defender.
Agree, which is why he'll sit nicely on a wing if we land him. Docherty/Stocker/Williamson come in to fit the Daisy role. LOB and Ellis occupy the wings, with Walsh and Setterfield chopping out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top