Rumour Bluemour Discussion thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think sos is after that outcome and fix our bookends for the next 5 to 10 years. I'll back him and trust him in whatever he sees is best for us long term
We don't need to do that in one shot. No-one here thinks that Carlton will be pushing up the ladder any time soon so we will have a few more cracks with early draft picks in the coming years.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If Kruezer does go pick #2 would be better compo then we could ever dream of.

But who will be #1 Ruck next year. Warnock will be delisted. Wood will be retained but more for depth.

A good Ruckman would make life for our young midfield much easier.

I would hate to lose Kruezer but if we were sure that it results in tier 1 compo (and I reckon he's worth that if Frawley was) I don't see how we could knock that back.

It has been reported that Martin wants to return to Melbourne and, if this is the case, would it be silly to suggest we could trade Bell for him (might need an exchange of later picks)?

Unlike Bell, Martin is out of contract and Brisbane are at the mercy of the trade table. If their going to lose him they may take that exchange. I guess it would depend on how much they wanted Bell.
 
I want Kreuz to stay, but if we can get Pick 2... bye bye.
If the future is the focus, then that's the way we must look at it.
In about 4 years time when our list is fully built and we re ready to have a crack at the big prize. Kreuz will be reaching the twilight of his Career (if his body allows him to last that long), while Weitering/Schache will just about be ready to enter the prime of theirs. That's when we ll kick ourselves for not pulling the trigger with Kreuz when we had the chance (ala the decision to not keep JK in the Judd trade).
 
If we were offered pick 2 for Kreuze... I'd be absolutely shocked at us knocking that back.

Yeah I don't think SOS could refuse that, the risk would just be too great. If we did refuse and Kreuzer were to get another long-term (possibly career-ending) injury in the near future, it's the sort of decision that could be career-ending for the list manager too.
 
If we are offered a first round pick for Menzel do we take it? Personally I loved his first year but has tapered off big time.
Gee the way we're going we are going to have 5 first round picks, all we need to do is get them right and it will speed up our rebuild!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The problem with a player like Menzel is that they can be the sort of icing on the cake type player that takes a good team to a great one (like Cyril). Those sort of players are wasted in a young rebuilding side because they don't get the opportunity to shine. So I wouldn't be adverse to that IF the deal was a good one for us. I certainly think he is expendable given where we are at.

See also Yarran, C.
 
As someone mentioned earlier, the club is REALLY pushing the 'bleed for the jumper' vibe as part of the rebuild / rebrand etc. I honestly cannot see how trading Kreuzer DOESN'T directly clash with this attitude. Do we want our club to stand for something or not?

We do need to stand for something yes, but within reason. That passion has to be balanced by sensible list decisions. You'd have to weigh up the chances of Kreuzer staying uninjured and improving vs the chances that Scache will make it and be a very good KP forward, while factoring in the time that both would have left in the game. It would be a very contentious decision to keep Kreuzer under the circumstances, and one that could open up a list manager to lots of scrutiny.

Definitely feel like the 'safe' decision for a list manager's career longevity would be to let Kreuzer go for pick 2.
 
We do need to stand for something yes, but within reason. That passion has to be balanced by sensible list decisions. You'd have to weigh up the chances of Kreuzer staying uninjured and improving vs the chances that Scache will make it and be a very good KP forward, while factoring in the time that both would have left in the game. It would be a very contentious decision to keep Kreuzer under the circumstances, and one that could open up a list manager to lots of scrutiny.
I get what you are saying, but its not about passion. Its about the message the CLUB is promoting - to supporters, backers AND players. By taking such a strong stance on Hendo (which is fine) and potentially Yarran then how can Mackay / Trigg come out and justify a Kreuzer trade - when everyone in the footy world sees him as Carlton's spiritual leader? I honestly think that it would be impossible to do.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I would hate to lose Kruezer but if we were sure that it results in tier 1 compo (and I reckon he's worth that if Frawley was) I don't see how we could knock that back.

It has been reported that Martin wants to return to Melbourne and, if this is the case, would it be silly to suggest we could trade Bell for him (might need an exchange of later picks)?

Unlike Bell, Martin is out of contract and Brisbane are at the mercy of the trade table. If their going to lose him they may take that exchange. I guess it would depend on how much they wanted Bell.

If we did lose Kruezer, Martain would be a great pick up. Could even be a PSD option.
He plays in a similar style to Kruezer but is much more prolific.
 
If Bell is keen to go home, I would like us to have a crack at Brandon Matera. I read somewhere about a month ago that even though he is contracted, the Suns would entertain a trade. Might need to do a swap of 2nd round picks to make it happen. I feel we need a small forward who can be dangerous & hit the scoreboard regularly. Getting sick of watching us get centre clearances only for the opposition defence to constantly sweep the ball out of our attack & hurting us the other way. Clem & Army are honest triers without having that goalsense the great small forwards have.
 
Here are the original posts on Currie for any who can't be bothered searching.

I would think he'd be second in line for us, behind the injury prone Kreuzer - not a bad place to be for an ambitious young ruckman. Think he'd slot in ahead of Wood in the pecking order. Might also provide depth for Casboult or just an extra tall option depending on match-ups, as he's shown in the VFL he can take marks and kick goals.

Averages this season (from 6 games):
39.33 hitouts
13.66 disposals
5.6 marks (47% contested)
4.33 tackles
...and has kicked 7.2 while resting forward (16.6 over 3 seasons).

Would allow us to delist Warnock and push Wood back on to the rookie list for further injury cover. I think he ticks a lot of boxes for us, and really shouldn't cost us too much (hell, we could offer up Daisy...North might see some value in it, and Daisy may not be all that keen on staying with Mick gone).

Only played 3 games after that point - out with a foot injury, listed as test at the moment.

Averages this season (from 9 games):
37.66 hitouts
12.11 disposals
5.22 marks (42.5% contested)
4 tackles
9 goals, 4 behinds in front of the big sticks

Figures are skewed a little low as he appears to have come off early in the final game. Really stacks up quite well when you consider he's been playing alongside Majak Daw, who has been chipping in with a few hitouts along the way.

Would love to get him reasonably cheap if at all possible. North aren't giving him any game time, so you'd think he might be amenable. He's 7 months younger than Goldstein, so no chance he can just wait for Goldy to retire before stepping up.
 
If Bell is keen to go home, I would like us to have a crack at Brandon Matera. I read somewhere about a month ago that even though he is contracted, the Suns would entertain a trade. Might need to do a swap of 2nd round picks to make it happen. I feel we need a small forward who can be dangerous & hit the scoreboard regularly. Getting sick of watching us get centre clearances only for the opposition defence to constantly sweep the ball out of our attack & hurting us the other way. Clem & Army are honest triers without having that goalsense the great small forwards have.
Matera highly rated - would be a great addition and reckon that trade could be done value wise (Bell for Matera straight or with 21<>29 swap) but just something about him seems to me that he has a poor attitude. Saying this, I've never met the bloke so may be completely wrong.
 
If Kruezer does go pick #2 would be better compo then we could ever dream of.

But who will be #1 Ruck next year. Warnock will be delisted. Wood will be retained but more for depth.

A good Ruckman would make life for our young midfield much easier.

I don't think it would cost all that much to nab a ruck man such as Zac Smith, Gorringe, Martin, Lycett/Sinclair...2nd rounder at most, which i think is more than fine to give up for a good first ruck...in a shallow draft and knowing us that second rounder wouldn't play a game for the club anyway.
 
The key here is to ensure that we are dead certain of what the compensation will be should we lose Kreuzer to Collingwood on a four year deal.

I would hate for the club to give him away - only to find out that we will get less in return as expected (which is what happened with Waite and had a flow on effect with Boekhorst selection IMO).

Need to get this right SOS.

Why would Collingwood be interested in Kreuzer when they have Grundy and Witts?
 
Matera highly rated - would be a great addition and reckon that trade could be done value wise (Bell for Matera straight or with 21<>29 swap) but just something about him seems to me that he has a poor attitude. Saying this, I've never met the bloke so may be completely wrong.

Not a Matera fan.

Has plenty of what you'd think you'd like in a footballer, but just doesn't get it enough and doesn't work hard enough to get it enough.
 
If we are offered a first round pick for Menzel do we take it? Personally I loved his first year but has tapered off big time.
Gee the way we're going we are going to have 5 first round picks, all we need to do is get them right and it will speed up our rebuild!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just from an outside perspective, i wouldn't.

Menzel is only a few years into his career...do we expect we can get better with the pick?
Has shown some glimpses of talent but also glimpses of competitiveness and eagerness to win...

I guess it comes back to how much he wants to play for the club...if he is 100% committed then i wouldn't accept that deal, but if he's a bit flakey and may want out anyway then id jump at a first rounder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top