Many of them were 'tongue in cheek' statements, written in sarcasm for that portion of 'supporters' who are very negative about players.
I agree about the negative supporters, but I disagree that many were tongue in cheek.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Many of them were 'tongue in cheek' statements, written in sarcasm for that portion of 'supporters' who are very negative about players.
Wood and either Cas or Rowe backing him up will do fine for the early days of a rebuild. When we are on the march we bring in a good ruck.
And we rookie one this year.
We don't need to do that in one shot. No-one here thinks that Carlton will be pushing up the ladder any time soon so we will have a few more cracks with early draft picks in the coming years.I think sos is after that outcome and fix our bookends for the next 5 to 10 years. I'll back him and trust him in whatever he sees is best for us long term
Second ruck plays as a KPP 80% of the time. Cas is perfect for itIt's frustrating though that we need to place either one of Cas or Rowe (essentially, KPP for us) as the second ruck.
If Kruezer does go pick #2 would be better compo then we could ever dream of.
But who will be #1 Ruck next year. Warnock will be delisted. Wood will be retained but more for depth.
A good Ruckman would make life for our young midfield much easier.
If we were offered pick 2 for Kreuze... I'd be absolutely shocked at us knocking that back.
If we are offered a first round pick for Menzel do we take it? Personally I loved his first year but has tapered off big time.
Gee the way we're going we are going to have 5 first round picks, all we need to do is get them right and it will speed up our rebuild!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As someone mentioned earlier, the club is REALLY pushing the 'bleed for the jumper' vibe as part of the rebuild / rebrand etc. I honestly cannot see how trading Kreuzer DOESN'T directly clash with this attitude. Do we want our club to stand for something or not?
I get what you are saying, but its not about passion. Its about the message the CLUB is promoting - to supporters, backers AND players. By taking such a strong stance on Hendo (which is fine) and potentially Yarran then how can Mackay / Trigg come out and justify a Kreuzer trade - when everyone in the footy world sees him as Carlton's spiritual leader? I honestly think that it would be impossible to do.We do need to stand for something yes, but within reason. That passion has to be balanced by sensible list decisions. You'd have to weigh up the chances of Kreuzer staying uninjured and improving vs the chances that Scache will make it and be a very good KP forward, while factoring in the time that both would have left in the game. It would be a very contentious decision to keep Kreuzer under the circumstances, and one that could open up a list manager to lots of scrutiny.
I would hate to lose Kruezer but if we were sure that it results in tier 1 compo (and I reckon he's worth that if Frawley was) I don't see how we could knock that back.
It has been reported that Martin wants to return to Melbourne and, if this is the case, would it be silly to suggest we could trade Bell for him (might need an exchange of later picks)?
Unlike Bell, Martin is out of contract and Brisbane are at the mercy of the trade table. If their going to lose him they may take that exchange. I guess it would depend on how much they wanted Bell.
3 year deal I believe is on the table. And it's only a matter of time. Although I suspect things may have changed since the Ratten scenario over the weekend.On Bolton - does anyone have any insight as to when the deal will be final and announced? I feel the announcement will fast-track things.
Marc Shmurf 3 Fernando2Gibbs reg_lower91 ?
Currie from North would be cheap and better then Warnock.
I would think he'd be second in line for us, behind the injury prone Kreuzer - not a bad place to be for an ambitious young ruckman. Think he'd slot in ahead of Wood in the pecking order. Might also provide depth for Casboult or just an extra tall option depending on match-ups, as he's shown in the VFL he can take marks and kick goals.
Averages this season (from 6 games):
39.33 hitouts
13.66 disposals
5.6 marks (47% contested)
4.33 tackles
...and has kicked 7.2 while resting forward (16.6 over 3 seasons).
Would allow us to delist Warnock and push Wood back on to the rookie list for further injury cover. I think he ticks a lot of boxes for us, and really shouldn't cost us too much (hell, we could offer up Daisy...North might see some value in it, and Daisy may not be all that keen on staying with Mick gone).
Only played 3 games after that point - out with a foot injury, listed as test at the moment.
Averages this season (from 9 games):
37.66 hitouts
12.11 disposals
5.22 marks (42.5% contested)
4 tackles
9 goals, 4 behinds in front of the big sticks
Figures are skewed a little low as he appears to have come off early in the final game. Really stacks up quite well when you consider he's been playing alongside Majak Daw, who has been chipping in with a few hitouts along the way.
Matera highly rated - would be a great addition and reckon that trade could be done value wise (Bell for Matera straight or with 21<>29 swap) but just something about him seems to me that he has a poor attitude. Saying this, I've never met the bloke so may be completely wrong.If Bell is keen to go home, I would like us to have a crack at Brandon Matera. I read somewhere about a month ago that even though he is contracted, the Suns would entertain a trade. Might need to do a swap of 2nd round picks to make it happen. I feel we need a small forward who can be dangerous & hit the scoreboard regularly. Getting sick of watching us get centre clearances only for the opposition defence to constantly sweep the ball out of our attack & hurting us the other way. Clem & Army are honest triers without having that goalsense the great small forwards have.
If Kruezer does go pick #2 would be better compo then we could ever dream of.
But who will be #1 Ruck next year. Warnock will be delisted. Wood will be retained but more for depth.
A good Ruckman would make life for our young midfield much easier.
The key here is to ensure that we are dead certain of what the compensation will be should we lose Kreuzer to Collingwood on a four year deal.
I would hate for the club to give him away - only to find out that we will get less in return as expected (which is what happened with Waite and had a flow on effect with Boekhorst selection IMO).
Need to get this right SOS.
Matera highly rated - would be a great addition and reckon that trade could be done value wise (Bell for Matera straight or with 21<>29 swap) but just something about him seems to me that he has a poor attitude. Saying this, I've never met the bloke so may be completely wrong.
If we are offered a first round pick for Menzel do we take it? Personally I loved his first year but has tapered off big time.
Gee the way we're going we are going to have 5 first round picks, all we need to do is get them right and it will speed up our rebuild!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why would Collingwood be interested in Kreuzer when they have Grundy and Witts?