If only we had a little genie that could pop out of bottle and sweeten the deal for life after football, most would take a pay cut for that kind of magic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Visa ambassadorIf only we had a little genie that could pop out of bottle and sweeten the deal for life after football, most would take a pay cut for that kind of magic.
Of course if Petracca wants to play for Carlton from next year he will be willing to take a reduced salary contract. That is obvious.
We are his way out of Melbourne. His only viable way really. If he wants a new start, we are the obvious path. What he gives up immediately financially can easily be made up by what Big Club Carlton can offer to Brand Petracca. We are uniquely well placed to do that.
If he plays for Carlton, it will be for very marginally under Patrick Cripps. But not over.
Celebrity chef at RaheenVisa ambassador
Cook will sort it out
Call it $960k for Cerra (625) and Martin (335).
That doesn't cover Petracca at a pay cut taking $1.1M, let alone a replacement player.
IF they endangered his life they are in breach.Apart from his contract...
He can posture about heading to court, I think we all know it won't end up there.
And possible for it to be set aside if the conduct rumours are trueSure, they can hold a disgruntled player to his contract. Until he asks to go out again next season when he's a year older and less value. What do Melbourne achieve with Petracca next year? Another mid table finish? Maybe they hope he comes around, can those sort of wounds and distrust ever be truly mended? Part of the reason you sign Petraca to a long term deal that expires when he's 34 or older is you want him to lead and set an example. Does a player with a history of trying to leave the club, trust issues with the staff and management and on a very high salary in a middling or bottom of the table team scream leader and example setter? I don't think so. The contract is only a weigh stone around Melbourne's neck at this point.
Yes, but I think less in the case of the contract actually being set aside (as that would likely take extensive time in dispute resolution and litigation to formalise, should it be commenced) but in the threat of it being there another knife hanging above Melbourne's head to get them to come to the table on a trade.And possible for it to be set aside if the conduct rumours are true
It's a lot but is it too much if he takes us from a perennial finalists team to a premiership team?1.1 to 1.5 is still too much for a player of his age, and for us to squeeze into our cap.
We already have a top-heavy list profile.
I think it would be hard for us to (responsibly) afford him on $1M a year, let alone the $1.2M - $1.7M that Melbourne owes him over the next 5 years.
Why would Melbourne pay any of his contract when he's walking out on them 2 years into a 7 year deal?Why would we possibly pay 100% of his contract? Melbourne will have to pay a decent %.
The only way I see that happening is if we could come up with much higher draft picks, which could be possible for Dees but much more difficult for us. The other way is Melbourne accepts a lower (albeit still high) range of draft picks (and maybe players), but whoever takes Trac either takes full cost of Petracca's salary (or is able to significantly renegotiate it - which I would suggest we'd probably want to do).Why would we possibly pay 100% of his contract? Melbourne will have to pay a decent %.
Couldn’t we salary dump a player if we needed the coin? Is that still a thing in this league or was that a system scrapped and conveniently only in place to get Jack Bowes, his contract and Pick 7 over to Geelong for a third rounder?
If we gave a similar deal (say our first to take Williams), what would we have left to trade for Petracca?
Gold Coast had an excess of picks (because of all the AFL handouts). We are not close to their position.
They are when clubs are leaking them, there's no way that Damien Barrett has such a specific knowledge of Petraccas contract without it being fed to him from Melbourne.Players' contracts should be public.
Pretty sure the salary cap rises $2 mil for 2025.
It’s not a question of saving money.
“The total player payments will jump from $15,022,778 in 2023 to $15,788,222 this year, before rising to $17.76m in 2025, $18.29m in 2026 and $18.44m in 2027. Players split an additional $1.267 million per club in additional services (marketing) across the life of the new CBA which runs until 2027.”
Massive spike in AFL’s million-dollar men as record numbers revealed
Massive spike in AFL’s million-dollar men as record numbers revealedwww.foxsports.com.au
Exactly.Happy to take a 40% pay cut?
I don't think we have any players whose salary is so bad that they wouldn't be a positive trade if we wanted to move them.Couldn’t we salary dump a player if we needed the coin? Is that still a thing in this league or was that system scrapped and conveniently only in place to get Jack Bowes, his contract and Pick 7 over to Geelong for a third rounder?