Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

The idea of trading out Kennedy and Kemp for 2 subpar picks in order to convert them into a better pick (i.e. 20-25) seems like a lot of capital out for minimal return. I assume it would be to then grab a KPD in the draft at that range. Are any of the KPD around that mark projected to be better than Kemp? If not then it makes zero sense.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I only understand Kemp leaving if it's for overs.

32 is not overs.

Anyone from St Kilda player wise we might be interested in?


Cbs No GIF by HULU
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top