Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

So does anyone know who we are taking at Pick 3? Speak now or forever hold your peace.
We're redrafting Blaine Boekhorst. Pretty sure.





Sorry, I probably should have held my peace...
 
Ah blinded by the speed, certainly selecting Sid Draper will satisfy the POD faction.
I rather finesse, skill and good footy IQ,
Whatever the outcome, Austin should get it right, anyone of FOS, Smith, Draper or Langford will add, exuberance and special natural abilities to our club.
In Austin we trust.
 
Where have we deliberately made it obvious?
From speaking to some people who know 'things', the general impression amongst other recruiting teams is that Carlton will take Draper.

I am unsure if that impression has been deliberately conveyed as a smokescreen, or that we are actually taking him.
 
From speaking to some people who know 'things', the general impression amongst other recruiting teams is that Carlton will take Draper.

I am unsure if that impression has been deliberately conveyed as a smokescreen, or that we are actually taking him.

It’s interesting that Adelaide would even consider moving up to 2 for Jagga (although that could all be media bullshit) if everyone thinks we’re taking Draper.
 
It’s interesting that Adelaide would even consider moving up to 2 for Jagga (although that could all be media bullshit) if everyone thinks we’re taking Draper.
Unless the wires got crossed and they actually want to move up for Draper or they see through our smoke screen and know that we want Jagga and want him too.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It’s interesting that Adelaide would even consider moving up to 2 for Jagga (although that could all be media bullshit) if everyone thinks we’re taking Draper.

Maybe it’s Austin’s elaborate masterplan to feign that we are selecting Draper to rattle the cage of Adelaide and force them to slide up to Roo’s Pick 2 which ensures we get our real target in Lalor or Foss. 🤷‍♂️
 
I think the adelaide musing about moving up for Smith isnt because they want him and think we will take him. They could want draper, and think we want him too. So they make it known they want to move up for smith rather than draper, as if we really want draper, we can outbid them for pick 2. 3+38 in this draft is more exciting than 4 and a future second next year. Maybe we really do want Smith and pull the trigger on that trade instead of adelaide, and draper falls to them either way.
 
From speaking to some people who know 'things', the general impression amongst other recruiting teams is that Carlton will take Draper.

I am unsure if that impression has been deliberately conveyed as a smokescreen, or that we are actually taking him.
So the age reported a couple days ago that recruiters think we are gonna take Jagga, now this bit of info that other recruiting teams think we will take Draper while the media in general think we will take Finn …

Sounds like mixed messages are being put out there by the club to who we are selecting …

I still think Langford is a real possibility as reported by Cal Twomey.
 
I think the adelaide musing about moving up for Smith isnt because they want him and think we will take him. They could want draper, and think we want him too. So they make it known they want to move up for smith rather than draper, as if we really want draper, we can outbid them for pick 2. 3+38 in this draft is more exciting than 4 and a future second next year. Maybe we really do want Smith and pull the trigger on that trade instead of adelaide, and draper falls to them either way.
Or, perhaps ive just overthought this like everyone else for the past month, and should just sleep until thursday, and be happy that whoever we picked was the one we wanted all along and cant believe that he slid as far as wherever our pick ends up being.
 
Draper scares me, yes we need speed through the midfield but we also need clean users, which he is not currently IMO. That being said, if there was a kid in this draft who was fast AND had incredible kicking, he'd be the number 1 pick and not available to us anyway lol.
He’s pretty clean over short/medium distance, but less accurate when kicking long and at full speed. I’d say he reminds me of Dangerfield in this regard, but I’d argue that Draper is a better user by foot.
 
I think the adelaide musing about moving up for Smith isnt because they want him and think we will take him. They could want draper, and think we want him too. So they make it known they want to move up for smith rather than draper, as if we really want draper, we can outbid them for pick 2. 3+38 in this draft is more exciting than 4 and a future second next year. Maybe we really do want Smith and pull the trigger on that trade instead of adelaide, and draper falls to them either way.
38 is insurance for Ben Campo

On CPH2135 using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Could be that they’re worried about Richmond trading up for 2 in order to select Jagga
I think the adelaide musing about moving up for Smith isnt because they want him and think we will take him. They could want draper, and think we want him too. So they make it known they want to move up for smith rather than draper, as if we really want draper, we can outbid them for pick 2. 3+38 in this draft is more exciting than 4 and a future second next year. Maybe we really do want Smith and pull the trigger on that trade instead of adelaide, and draper falls to them either way.
Neither Richmond nor us are moving up to 2.

If we were playing funny buggers and fake leaking, and wanting Crows to jump us, it would be to so we could get FOS (who there is still a chance of North taking).

Or, if it’s a more legitimate concern for Adelaide, it might be that they want Smith, and if North keep 2 they take Foss instead of Tauru, and then we’d take Smith as our second choice. If everyone thinks we’re legitimately taking Draper, there’s no reason for the Crows to trade up. They would still get Smith at 4.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top