Yes that's the Ben Mckay vibes which I talk about.Average player keeps being average isn't a sign he's got a new deal under his nose.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes that's the Ben Mckay vibes which I talk about.Average player keeps being average isn't a sign he's got a new deal under his nose.
Next time Essendon win he'll have sung the song as many times as he joined in the chorus over 71 games at North.Yes that's the Ben Mckay vibes which I talk about.
Maybe explain what you mean by vibes ?Yes that's the Ben Mckay vibes which I talk about.
Rather than obsessing over $$ and draft position, he just reminds me of a player that's already agreed to part ways.Maybe explain what you mean by vibes ?
Zurhaar is doing exactly what he has done throughout his career and thats averaging 12-13 pos and a goal a game
if by vibes you mean he will get north a 1st round pick thats highly unlikely
KPD v Med foward are totally different
i would even go as far as to say a player like Will McLachlan , Hutchinson or Phoenix Spicer would better value at $100k a year.
Really an under performing average player and would hate to think anything more than $500-550k would be his value in todays tpp space
but who know Polec got $750k a year
probably best for both clubsRather than obsessing over $$ and draft position, he just reminds me of a player that's already agreed to part ways.
...let me introduce you to the 2023 ben mckay threadBloke stinking it up like he doesn't want to be there cant blame him really
North can forget thinking they will get band 1 compo reckon Cam would be just happy to get out
Mckay had a solid season for you blokes and pick 3 seems justified right now...let me introduce you to the 2023 ben mckay thread
Well that could create a problemNot getting band 1 but band 2 is possible and is probably about his value anyway all things considered. I'd still be interested, particularly if we miss Baker
Don't think there is much of a difference between band 2 and what we would be prepared to give for him, if any at all. What do you think he'd worth? St Kilda second round pick would be closer to his value than our latest first (whatever it is) IMOWell that could create a problem
North have made him an offer and would be expecting prospective suiters to significantly up that offer to ensure a good pick
Freo having the 3 1st rounders and RFA they could just as easily match and force a trade for a better pick
Would freo be happy to hand over a mid 1st rounder and trade for him ?
Correct me if I’m wrong, Band 1 is first round, band 2 is end of first round?Not getting band 1 but band 2 is possible and is probably about his value anyway all things considered. I'd still be interested, particularly if we miss Baker
Personally i dont rate him and he is an extremely conditional player thats selfish and goes for personal interest on the ground. Very much a Kmart StringerDon't think there is much of a difference between band 2 and what we would be prepared to give for him, if any at all. What do you think he'd worth? St Kilda second round pick would be closer to his value than our latest first (whatever it is) IMO
It could be overs or it may not, but I don’t see how it’s relevant. This isn’t a trade and a fair market value isn’t being sort. It’s compensation tied directly to how bad the club is and his new pay.Correct me if I’m wrong, Band 1 is first round, band 2 is end of first round?
I know it’s almost irrelevant, given that North’s will finish towards the bottom, but band 2 will roughly equate to pick 19.
I think that’s overs for Zurhaar.
It could be overs or it may not, but I don’t see how it’s relevant. This isn’t a trade and a fair market value isn’t being sort. It’s compensation tied directly to how bad the club is and his new pay.
The reward is greater for poor performing clubs as the impact of loss is higher, and the reward is smaller for the better performing clubs. It’s not designed to be ‘fair’.
Also, it is expected that he will be paid “overs” as the buyer doesn’t need to spend a pick to get him. If that value ends up putting him in say the top 5% of his age group, then it will be band 1. top 15% probably band 2. We’ll see.
He will be offerred at least 700K. Will take a club to offer 800K to get him out, which will trigger Band 1, if he goes.Bloke stinking it up like he doesn't want to be there cant blame him really
North can forget thinking they will get band 1 compo reckon Cam would be just happy to get out
Don't think there is much of a difference between band 2 and what we would be prepared to give for him, if any at all. What do you think he'd worth? St Kilda second round pick would be closer to his value than our latest first (whatever it is) IMO
Doubt north get band 1 for Zuurhar this year with $800k contractHe will be offerred at least 700K. Will take a club to offer 800K to get him out, which will trigger Band 1, if he goes.
I kinda think other clubs would outbid you. Its not a good like to be giving him a big contract with Treacy/Amiss around who are worthy of more money then a ZurhaarNot getting band 1 but band 2 is possible and is probably about his value anyway all things considered. I'd still be interested, particularly if we miss Baker
I think he would be great at the Swans if they lost Haywood.funny all the money and teams going after hayward (rightly so) . When you look into stats they are almost even which is interesting. How would hayward be going at north with the lack of into 50's? how'd Zurhaar be going at the swans?
Think he has a role to play in a good team just the asking price is a tad whacked.
I don't think there would be to many North supporters believing we would get band 1 for him. Not this one anyway.Doubt north get band 1 for Zuurhar this year with $800k contract
With Salary cap increases the herbs and spices have also increased other wise the AFL will be giving away picks like confetti
It could be overs or it may not, but I don’t see how it’s relevant. This isn’t a trade and a fair market value isn’t being sort. It’s compensation tied directly to how bad the club is and his new pay.
The reward is greater for poor performing clubs as the impact of loss is higher, and the reward is smaller for the better performing clubs. It’s not designed to be ‘fair’.
Also, it is expected that he will be paid “overs” as the buyer doesn’t need to spend a pick to get him. If that value ends up putting him in say the top 5% of his age group, then it will be band 1. top 15% probably band 2. We’ll see.