Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why not? Head high, clearly intentional, and enough impact for naughton to spend the next thirty seconds holding his face. That's a week according to the rules. If some tough guy wants to punch an 18 year old in the face, he should get what's coming to him.Nor should it
I'll go and have another look but I would have thought unintentional and low to med impact.Why not? Head high, clearly intentional, and enough impact for naughton to spend the next thirty seconds holding his face. That's a week according to the rules. If some tough guy wants to punch an 18 year old in the face, he should get what's coming to him.
Wash your mouth outDon’t shoot me but I’ve got a bad feeling about this game....I feel we’ll regress to how we played weeks and and 2. Eeek
He would fly anyway. He's from WA so would be good to see family.I reckon we give English a spell this week. He's worked his arse off and done an amazing job the last few weeks, I don't want to risk the string bean on a 4 hour flight to be eaten alive by Sandilands. Give him a rest for a week and send Roughy and Trengrove over.
It was after the tackle, in the ensuing fight, so can't really be unintentional.I'll go and have another look but I would have thought unintentional and low to med impact.
But let's put that aside and say yeah it deserves to be looked at, the whole dogs get shafted by the tribunal narrative is as petty as Sydney's we get shafted by the umpires narrative.
Oh good point, forgot about that!He would fly anyway. He's from WA so would be good to see family.
English just has to get some support this week. Unfair to play him on his lonesome against Sandilands.
Tom Boyd to come back in.
https://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480803.htmlI'll go and have another look but I would have thought unintentional and low to med impact.
But let's put that aside and say yeah it deserves to be looked at, the whole dogs get shafted by the tribunal narrative is as petty as Sydney's we get shafted by the umpires narrative.
If we drop Naughton for Roberts I’ll burn Whitten Oval down..
Honestly cannot believe there are people calling for Richards to be dropped. What more does he have to do in his first three games?
Know it’s controversial but his ball use is absolutely shocking. He is kicking at 63.9% efficiency which rates him below average. The technique is absolutely shocking and needs work which in my opinion is too big of a liability to take into a game of AFL. As I said Roberts is quite a sound kick and is also a very capable defender in himself. Naughton is a wonderful intercept player and will be a premier player in the competition in the not so distant future but his kicking needs work and to be frank VFL is where this development needs to take place.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Tend to agree on Naughton but Id replace with Cordy and/or Trengove. Quite happy if Fletch never plays for us again. Naughton's diabolical kicking will cost us goals - its not even a question of if but when. Given he is from WA I reckon he will play though. And I think it is abundantly clear that the club values kicking skill far less than other skills (and other clubs). Its the only explanation for our recruitment and selection approach.
Cant complain too much - got us a flag.
Quite happy to have Trengove instead of Roberts, however I was more keen on Roberts due to fitness at this stage.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Yeah I guess I disagree as I'd still prefer Naughton to Fletch as his shit one on one skills and athleticism will cost more goals than Naughton's shit kicking- and also I'd prefer herpes to Fletch.