Number 10. He cost us a couple of goals in the 2nd quarter, with a lack of composure and poor skills. Only his 2nd game, I'm sure he'll improve with experience.Who the **** is he? Don’t recall hearing his name or what he looks like
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Number 10. He cost us a couple of goals in the 2nd quarter, with a lack of composure and poor skills. Only his 2nd game, I'm sure he'll improve with experience.Who the **** is he? Don’t recall hearing his name or what he looks like
Number 10. He cost us a couple of goals in the 2nd quarter, with a lack of composure and poor skills. Only his 2nd game, I'm sure he'll improve with experience.
Greenwood & Crouch both really fell out of the game after half time. Crouch was interviewed at the end of the game and said that he struggled in the second half. Had 22 disposals in the first half, finished with 30. Having 2 players drop out of the midfield due to a lack of fitness was the main reason why Gold Coast were able to get back into the game in the second half.Would probably be an unlucky CEY. Greenwood tired, really want his tank built a bit more. But CEY in your scenario.
No he won't!Someone goes out for Betts and he's the unlucky one
Seed might have been named on the half-back line, but he doesn't play there. Mackay & Milera were our HBFers tonight, until Mackay got injured. Very possible that Smith takes Mackay's place in the team, if/when he returns later this year.so here's a question.... once Smith is back and fit, who makes way for him?
Our half back line will be Laird, Milera and Seeds.
Could this be the magical fabled time where Mackay gets dropped and we start rotating these 4 between half back and the wing even more?
Greenwood & Crouch both really fell out of the game after half time. Crouch was interviewed at the end of the game and said that he struggled in the second half. Had 22 disposals in the first half, finished with 30. Having 2 players drop out of the midfield due to a lack of fitness was the main reason why Gold Coast were able to get back into the game in the second half.
He was... but (unlike Sloane) Crouch isn't the type of player who's susceptible to a tag. Crouch admitted in the post-game interview that he just ran out of legs after having 3 weeks off.Crouch was also tagged post half time
Happy to have a board bet that Knight remains... as imo your call is clueless!Three best 22 players in contention to come back. Therefore three must go out.
I'll be ******* furious if we drop Gallucci so Knight it is
Walker?Out: Mackay, Poholke
In: Sloane, Betts
Following week.. tough one for who goes out for Kelly and Mackay..
Anyone playing for you guys who we might consider worth poaching come end of year?
Then what are you doing creating this thread?I'm not predicting the coaches' moves.
But I am interested in who you would drop to fit in our three returning best 22 players
Did they show either the Walker or Mackay injury?
Or were these more of those phantom injuries we seem to pick up?
Poholke and CEY for Sloane and BettsSomeone goes out for Betts and he's the unlucky one
You'd think they'd get near the ball a bit more often with those numbers!Knight covered 15.6 km today.. the most on the ground.
Next best for us was Rat with 14.6
Damn.. 15.6 is impressive since he’s just pinch hitting in the midfield.
Then what are you doing creating this thread?
Coming up with crazy calls to get noticed?
Rat had 28, Knight 17. Rat has no issue finding the ball, Knight does.You'd think they'd get near the ball a bit more often with those numbers!
Atkins 28 really! Barely noticed him except for a few blundersRat had 28, Knight 17. Rat has no issue finding the ball, Knight does.
So what are you trying to prove?These threads have never been about predicting what the coaches are going to do.
It's about fostering discussion around the upcoming game and the changes we would make. Predicting what the coaches would do serves no purpose other than to prove yourself right; what a stupid and boring thread that would be
They both seriously had that many touches? If you'd told me half as many for either I would have believed you more...Rat had 28, Knight 17. Rat has no issue finding the ball, Knight does.