Preview Changes V Port Adelaide (team in OP, no change, Grundy, BK and Schazza emergencies)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
A player from Port saying they are/should be pumped up does not mean that they will be or that it will make them play better. It may do the opposite. It's hard to tell with these things.

Exactly, could be as flat as a shoit carters hat
 
If you're anticipating a ruckman going out after this weeks game then wouldn't it be more logical to retain the better performed one? Nominating Witts just a tad premature.
Yeah, probably, although I feel I've seen enough throughout the year to form the view that Grundy is a better option in the ruck (both in the hitout contests and around the ground) than Witts, so barring a very good or very bad game from one or the other, I'd expect Grundy to get the nod.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yeah, probably, although I feel I've seen enough throughout the year to form the view that Grundy is a better option in the ruck (both in the hitout contests and around the ground) than Witts, so barring a very good or very bad game from one or the other, I'd expect Grundy to get the nod.

I tend to think that if fit and available, they'll play both.
 
Out of curiosity if Marley were to miss this week who would we all call for to come in? I just feel like we're running thin on genuine small defenders ATM...

Sinclair?
Armstrong?
Manteit?
Young?
 
Out of curiosity if Marley were to miss this week who would we all call for to come in? I just feel like we're running thin on genuine small defenders ATM...

Out of curiosity, why the question? You have reason to believe Marley will miss? :eek: :eek:
 
Hey guys
The Port people have been invited over to join the discussion here, in lieu of the Banter thread, which just doesn't feel right this week, considering Phil Walsh's tragic death and his association with both our clubs.
Please be friendly and respectful.

fyi Vicky Park Gone Critical NT.Thunder
 
Yeah, probably, although I feel I've seen enough throughout the year to form the view that Grundy is a better option in the ruck (both in the hitout contests and around the ground) than Witts, so barring a very good or very bad game from one or the other, I'd expect Grundy to get the nod.

Couldn't disagree more. Witts is so much better in the ruck contest it's not funny. He's also equal around the ground. Grundy is a better mark but has terrible mobility.
 
Hey guys
The Port people have been invited over to join the discussion here, in lieu of the Banter thread, which just doesn't feel right this week, considering Phil Walsh's tragic death and his association with both our clubs.
Please be friendly and respectful.

fyi Vicky Park Gone Critical NT.Thunder

Ross FC has come in early with some good form.
 
Yeah, probably, although I feel I've seen enough throughout the year to form the view that Grundy is a better option in the ruck (both in the hitout contests and around the ground) than Witts, so barring a very good or very bad game from one or the other, I'd expect Grundy to get the nod.

I think Witts has been far more accomplished with his hitouts than Grundy this season. Grundy is better in his second and third efforts. It's hard to tell who is ahead of who right now. I'm still not convinced we can afford to play both in the same side given it makes us more static on team balance. Its a fair selection dilemma.
 
Out of curiosity, why the question? You have reason to believe Marley will miss? :eek: :eek:

Nothing at this stage, but Varcoe aside he's the only small defender we have with any semblance of form behind him so it would be a worry were he to miss in the short term...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Out of curiosity if Marley were to miss this week who would we all call for to come in? I just feel like we're running thin on genuine small defenders ATM...
What's wrong with Marley???

Ok, now they're just pulling random stats out of their ass. Reminds me of ESPN in relation to LeBron.
 
What's wrong with Marley???

He said If

Ok, now they're just pulling random stats out of their ass. Reminds me of ESPN in relation to LeBron.

I thought it was interesting, weather we win or lose we'll brake a streak. I was actually worried about the Thursday night one but now hearing the Hawthorn one fills me with some more confidence.
 
He said If
It sounds slightly concerning that he's bringing up the thought of replacing Marley.
I thought it was interesting, weather we win or lose we'll brake a streak. I was actually worried about the Thursday night one but now hearing the Hawthorn one fills me with some more confidence.
Those sorts of stats mean absolutely nothing. It's not like the players somehow play worse on Thursday nights.
 
It sounds slightly concerning that he's bringing up the thought of replacing Marley.

Read his other posts.

Those sorts of stats mean absolutely nothing. It's not like the players somehow play worse on Thursday nights.

They are harmless, its not like an 'expert' used it in his reasoning why Collingwood or Port would win.
 
Nothing at this stage, but Varcoe aside he's the only small defender we have with any semblance of form behind him so it would be a worry were he to miss in the short term...
Fingers crossed Sinkers can get up to speed in the VFL quickly. Been out a while, but he was in great form before his hammy and hasn't missed a beat on return.
 
I've only watched a the first quarter of the VFL but it was easily the best I've seen Scharenberg play for us. It's time for a call up imo.
 
Was there when they won the Flag and up up Last Year I think
that certainly will give them soem powerful moivation then, and also perhaps would tend to put a dent in the resolve of our players. They should remember that life and footy goes on, Phil lived for footy and wouldn't want his death to give one team a psychological advantage. Actually some might suggest it's a pretty tricky ploy to get a psychological advantage.
 
Last edited:
I have to admit, i am interested in seeing this so called "Scharenberg" play.. Feel like i haven't seen/heard much about him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top