Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yes, Bcoz we are taking Buss with 8.Would Ginbey last until 12?
The longer this thread goes on the less and less I like that we gave up 2. The fact that no-one can settle on who we should select BC they all have some questions says to me that we could've had wardlaw or sheezal.....both of which will play 22 games next year and in the running for rising star. Bonafide mid and forward gone begging for HBF with midfield potential.To me it's a no brainer. Ginbey, McKenzie, Hotton, can be part of a good midfield. Where as a few others can be the best player in your midfield and also have goal kicking ability.
Phillipou- Fyfe like. SA's best midfielder and also elite overhead. A handful when playing fwd.
Humphrey- Petracca like. Powerful unit, kicks goals, great one on one, haphazard disposal but is often under pressure.
Clark- Selwood like, not too many frills but gets the job done violently.
Busslinger- Barrass Mk-2. Intercepts everything, good disposal. Just needs to tighten up his lockdown skills which aren't terrible.
----------------------------------------------
Ginbey- SPP like. Poor disposal even in open space , quick and strong. Might only get 16 disposals but will bust through a few tackles and make something out of nothing.
Mackenzie- Tidy disposal balanced mid and has no major weaknesses but is just not dominant in any areas.
Szybkowski - Composed and makes really good decisions with the footy. Just doesn't get it enough or do a lot else.
Sheezel is by no means the complete player. He is the one with questionable midfield capabilities and is often very quiet in games for long periods. Has upside but could end up like Billings who is a dangerous fwd but average as a wing/mid.The longer this thread goes on the less and less I like that we gave up 2. The fact that no-one can settle on who we should select BC they all have some questions says to me that we could've had wardlaw or sheezal.....both of which will play 22 games next year and in the running for rising star. Bonafide mid and forward gone begging for HBF with midfield potential.
BahahaGod I hope not.
Imagine finishing 2nd last with 2 wins and not picking until 13 in the draft
If we still had pick 2, people would be arguing about whether Wardlaw’s hammies were worth the risk, or if Sheezel was worth using pick 2 on a half forward or if Tsatas was too outside with poor disposal etcThe longer this thread goes on the less and less I like that we gave up 2. The fact that no-one can settle on who we should select BC they all have some questions says to me that we could've had wardlaw or sheezal.....both of which will play 22 games next year and in the running for rising star. Bonafide mid and forward gone begging for HBF with midfield potential.
On Pixel 6 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
He did beat up mid year against a few weaker teams. Only played mid season in the midfield for majority minutes. Looked genuinely able to make #1 spot his. But then at the champs was often unsighted as mostly a pure forward. Though when he got near it was one touch and generally dangerous which is why he is so highly rated.Totally disagree on your analysis of sheezal. This sounds a shite load better than any WA prospect we're looking at.
Rare air: The top-10 draft hopeful with MASSIVE numbers - Rare air: The top-10 draft hopeful with MASSIVE numbers
# | Club | Player | Finished(Ladder) | Opposition | Round | Goals | Disp | Kick | Hand | Marks | Tackles | HO | IN 50 | RE 50 |
16 | Sandringham Dragons | Harry Sheezel | Averages-> | 2.6 | 19.3 | 11.8 | 7.5 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 0.9 | ||
5th | Oakleigh Chargers | 1 | 1 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | |||
10th | Calder Cannons | 2 | 2 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |||
GWS | 3 | 4 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | ||||
2nd | Tasmania Devils | 4 | 6 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | |||
5 | ||||||||||||||
6 | ||||||||||||||
7 | ||||||||||||||
3rd | Dandenong Stingrays | 8 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |||
13th | Northern Knights | 9 | 0 | 37 | 24 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 5 | |||
11th | Western Jets | 10 | 3 | 33 | 18 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | |||
11 | ||||||||||||||
12 | ||||||||||||||
6th | Geelong Falcons | 13 | 4 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | |||
14 | ||||||||||||||
7th | Eastern Ranges | 15 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
5th | Oakleigh Chargers | 16 | 4 | 22 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
9th | Murray Bushrangers | WCR | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||
10th | Calder Cannons | FW1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
1st | Gippsland Power | FW2 | 3 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
3rd | Dandenong Stingrays | GF | 4 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
He'd need to consult a doctor if that happensYou don't know if O'Briens hard on will last that long
Starcevich 2.0.Wait, i just googled Ginbey's stats.
Is he seriously a proposed midfielder based on the following stats? If you can't find the ball consistently pre-draft, you're not going to all of a sudden become a prolific ball winner at AFL level. Unless i'm missing some games where racked it up this is absolutely yuck, do not want, no matter what his athletic profile is.
View attachment 1540390
So if there aren't top level genuine mids available at 8 why on earth did we trade out pick 2Of the players talked of being available at our pick I think Clark and Mackenzie, maybe Hollands also, are the genuine mids. Clark and Mackenzie are likely to go before 8 with Hollands a chance to be taken by Gold Coast
Now if it falls that way the choices other than Ginbey are :
• Humphrey - more a high half forward and has questions on his disposal
• Busslinger - KPD
• Phillipou - more a mid than Ginbey but I’ve still read doubts on whether he’s a mid or a forward
Ginbey is a risk in that he hasn’t proven a capacity to be a high production mid but he does have a big body and pace. Handy attributes that we lack. Also seems to have a genuine competitive streak/bit of campaigner to him as well
pock 20+21+23 = pick 30-36Bahaha
My god I was thinking of this joke
Hmm we got pick 1
I know
Pick 1 --> Pick 8 + 13 GENIUS
Pick 8 + 13 --> Pick 16 + Pick 18 + 2023 F2 GENIUS
Pick 16 + 18 --> Pick 20 + Pick 21 + Pick 23 + Pick 2023 F3
WE WIN BOZ
Because there's only Wardlaw and he has concerns over injury/homesickness.So if there aren't top level genuine mids available at 8 why on earth did we trade out pick 2
On Starcevich 1.0 - do you think he will transition into your midfield at some point soon?Starcevich 2.0.
It doesn’t look likely at this stage.On Starcevich 1.0 - do you think he will transition into your midfield at some point soon?
In 2017 he was my favourite leading into the draft. In my mind then he would follow the same path Yeo did- down back to begin with & then transition into midfield minutes as he hit his prime. I haven’t changed that thought I think he’s got a lot of potential.
show me the stats ANY mid/forw in the draft that has at NAB league an average 2.6 goals per game, 20 touches 3.3 tackles 8 score involvements and at the national champs not much less. kids a gun.He did beat up mid year against a few weaker teams. Only played mid season in the midfield for majority minutes. Looked genuinely able to make #1 spot his. But then at the champs was often unsighted as mostly a pure forward. Though when he got near it was one touch and generally dangerous which is why he is so highly rated.
# Club Player Finished(Ladder) Opposition Round Goals Disp Kick Hand Marks Tackles HO IN 50 RE 50 16 Sandringham Dragons Harry Sheezel Averages-> 2.6 19.3 11.8 7.5 3.6 3.3 0.1 2.9 0.9 5th Oakleigh Chargers 1 1 16 14 2 3 3 0 4 1 10th Calder Cannons 2 2 16 6 10 3 1 1 2 0 GWS 3 4 18 14 4 5 3 0 3 0 2nd Tasmania Devils 4 6 28 14 14 5 5 0 4 1 5 6 7 3rd Dandenong Stingrays 8 1 18 9 9 1 3 0 1 2 13th Northern Knights 9 0 37 24 13 9 7 0 7 5 11th Western Jets 10 3 33 18 15 6 4 0 4 2 11 12 6th Geelong Falcons 13 4 20 15 5 2 1 0 4 1 14 7th Eastern Ranges 15 1 15 9 6 0 4 0 2 0 5th Oakleigh Chargers 16 4 22 14 8 6 7 0 1 0 9th Murray Bushrangers WCR 1 13 8 5 3 1 0 4 0 10th Calder Cannons FW1 2 5 3 2 1 2 0 2 0 1st Gippsland Power FW2 3 16 7 9 3 3 0 1 0 3rd Dandenong Stingrays GF 4 13 10 3 3 2 0 1 0
show me the stats ANY mid/forw in the draft that has at NAB league an average 2.6 goals per game, 20 touches 3.3 tackles 8 score involvements and at the national champs not much less. kids a gun.
disagree. we shouldve kept 2, taken wardlaw or sheezal and if they sook and want home in a yr or 2 we get 2 first rounders for the trade. back ourselves in as the biggest club in the country to convince these kids to stay longer.This board is sounding like it is getting ahead of itself and moaning about our slide. There are genuine mids all the way through to 15 and we are splitting hairs based on pretty ill-informed assumptions.
What we have is a selection of mids with different attributes.
Put yourself in the Piemans shoes, he has Culley, Chesser and Hough from 2022. He also has Bazzo that looks a winner. We need heavy hauls this draft and next year then we will be on our way.
From experience, the Pieman rarely follows my preferred path but we don’t see the stuff in interviews etc. They have more input so can make better decisions.
One of our regular WAFL East Perth colts followers believes Ginbey is a great pick. Strong links to the Suns and rising up Twomey’s ranking meaning a few clubs think alike. Not my preferred choice but when does ROB ever ask me?
What 8 and 12 does is allow a bit of best available and needs. We can always balance off with 20 and 26.
Are the interstate clubs sending AFL a message that we can’t go for many Vic Metro cry babies? Are we behind the scenes working with Freo to get some sort of zone? Last year combined was very WA leaning.
Relax, chill out and don’t sweat the small stuff
Ok so he goes home. we get 2 early first rounders in the 2025 draft. sound good to me considering the draft will compromised from 2026 on for the tassie team.Doesnt matter how good the Cheezel is. He was going home right after his first contract ends. We could never pick him.
On Starcevich 1.0 - do you think he will transition into your midfield at some point soon?
In 2017 he was my favourite leading into the draft. In my mind then he would follow the same path Yeo did- down back to begin with & then transition into midfield minutes as he hit his prime. I haven’t changed that thought I think he’s got a lot of potential.
2020 | Melbourne | 86.2 | 0.9 | 23.5 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 11.9 | 11.6 | 0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | Melbourne | 75.8 | 1 | 18.7 | 4 | 3 | 2.3 | 9.6 | 9 | 0.2 |
2018 | Melbourne | 79.4 | 0.8 | 20.3 | 4 | 3 | 2.6 | 11.2 | 9.1 | 0.2 |
2017 | Melbourne | 71 | 1.2 | 18.8 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 8.2 | 10.6 | 0 |
2016 | Melbourne | 67.9 | 0.7 | 17.4 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 2 | 8.5 | 8.9 | 0.2 |
2015 | Melbourne | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Starcevich could never find the ball even playing on ball.Starcevich 2.0.
Starcevich was always allergic to the football. Unlike Ginbey he played most of his time as a junior on ball.On Starcevich 1.0 - do you think he will transition into your midfield at some point soon?
In 2017 he was my favourite leading into the draft. In my mind then he would follow the same path Yeo did- down back to begin with & then transition into midfield minutes as he hit his prime. I haven’t changed that thought I think he’s got a lot of potential.
Ok so he goes home. we get 2 early first rounders in the 2025 draft. sound good to me considering the draft will compromised from 2026 on for the tassie team.
What's the point in having him for 2 years and then we are back to square one. It just prolongs our build and helps another team.Ok so he goes home. we get 2 early first rounders in the 2025 draft. sound good to me considering the draft will compromised from 2026 on for the tassie team.