Granit1962
Senior List
- May 17, 2024
- 152
- 250
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Yep, tend to agreeI don't think we'll get 29 as well as 23. I think it'd be one or the other.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yep, tend to agreeI don't think we'll get 29 as well as 23. I think it'd be one or the other.
That would just be a 3 team trade without pick 13 involved not a bunch of circle trades, but yeah suns want to use 13 in a trade so it can have future picks instead it seemsCan a pick be traded back to the club that started with it?
As in, could we get pick 13 from GC as part of Noble trade, then trade it to Port as part of Houston trade, who then send it back to GC as part of Lukosius trade?
I know it won’t happen coz GC want points instead of pick 13 but is such a circular pick trade actually allowed?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I'd trade this one. We'll bounce back next year and there's likely to be a heap of academy picks, plus the contracts to Perryman and Battle have to have made free agency a heap more attractive - I'd be expecting a few of them with compo picks pushing picks back. As much as everyone says it could be a top 5 pick - it's more chance to be an over 20s pick in a weaker draft. It'd be worth more now.We need to stop trading future 1sts, it’s been a disaster every time.
I’d rather do Noble and 36 for 13. GC gets Noble and they still get points this year.
Then 13 and Richards for Houston.
We keep our future 1st and Get Houston for the price of Noble, Richards and 36.
Port aren't paying anywhere the Houston price for Lukosius.My guess is based on what's being reported, CFC will need to give up their future first, future second or second in this year's draft plus John for picks 13, 23 and 29.
Those picks will be passed onto Port who will give them back to GC to forward onto Richmond.
Taking the scenic route!
My guess is based on what's being reported, CFC will need to give up their future first, future second or second in this year's draft plus John for picks 13, 23 and 29.
Those picks will be passed onto Port who will give them back to GC to forward onto Richmond.
Taking the scenic route!
Watch the falcons during the day.I spent most of the day away from BF. I logged on tonight, and after about an hour, I was already exhausted. Trade week can be very draining. I may have issues sleeping tonight. Someone save me.
And that's why GC needs to know who is dealing with Port!My guess is based on what's being reported, CFC will need to give up their future first, future second or second in this year's draft plus John for picks 13, 23 and 29.
Those picks will be passed onto Port who will give them back to GC to forward onto Richmond.
Taking the scenic route!
Based on the Carlton offer for 13 - we'd be matching that with future first and second rounder. Meaning we'd effectively be trading Noble for 23 and 29 - it's definitely overs, but if you were to trade those picks to move up, it probably gets you to about 17 - so it's not ridiculously crazy Rioli price overs. It'd be a great deal for us though. Bring it on.My guess is based on what's being reported, CFC will need to give up their future first, future second or second in this year's draft plus John for picks 13, 23 and 29.
If they are not calling umpires cheating maggots, it’s referring to the opposition as scum and denigrating commentators they keep reading/tuning into.Random thought, but this thread has been seriously entertaining, even if half of it is bagging the crap out of anti Collingwood journalists
.
My guess is CFC will try and keep 23, port will try and keep 29 but would prefer 23 and 13, passing 13 back to GC.Based on the Carlton offer for 13 - we'd be matching that with future first and second rounder. Meaning we'd effectively be trading Noble for 23 and 29 - it's definitely overs, but if you were to trade those picks to move up, it probably gets you to about 17 - so it's not ridiculously crazy Rioli price overs. It'd be a great deal for us though. Bring it on.
Port won't give up that 13. I think Lukosius is going to be very cheap. I think GC will try to hide his price within a 3 club trade.My guess is CFC will try and keep 23, port will try and keep 29 but would prefer 23 and 13, passing 13 back to GC.
Yeah, if I was GC or a supporter, first and second round minimum. You don't let that kind of talent go for nothing and they will need the picks to pass on for Rioli. I wouldn't be giving up pick 6 for Rioli, pick 13 and a late second maybe.Port won't give up that 13. I think Lukosius is going to be very cheap. I think GC will try to hide his price within a 3 club trade.
He's talented, but he's on a massive contract - rumoured to be on a million bucks a year and he's only just above a fringe player for them. They'll want him gone and Port will squeeze them.Yeah, if I was GC or a supporter, first and second round minimum. You don't let that kind of talent go for nothing and they will need the picks to pass on for Rioli. I wouldn't be giving up pick 6 for Rioli, pick 13 and a late second maybe.
We're all trapped here with you, bud.This thread is doing my head in.
Firstly it's impossible to keep up with.
Secondly, I go to bed here. European time. Wake up in the morning to find that the thread has advanced five thousand pages.
I'm thinking to myself "İf the thread has advanced five thousand pages overnight, then something must have happened to create this amount of discussion"
I then read/scroll through said five thousand pages and it's crickets.
I can absolutely empathize with that weird penis with a stick prodding the Collingwood logo saying "do something".
This is a difficult place indeedDrDrHiWe're all trapped here with you, bud.
Do we need help, do you reckon?
I can absolutely empathize with that weird penis with a stick prodding the Collingwood logo saying "do something".
It's really easy to make blanket statements about trading future firsts without showing the full outcomes of the deals, such as the jury still being out on Schultz for pick 14*. It also doesn't take into account that in the last 10 years our record of first round drafting (excluding F/S and Academy) has yielded only one success, JDG.We need to stop trading future 1sts, it’s been a disaster every time.
I’d rather do Noble and 36 for 13. GC gets Noble and they still get points this year.
Then 13 and Richards for Houston.
We keep our future 1st and Get Houston for the price of Noble, Richards and 36.
Sure we'd like to do that. Not sure GC and Port would thoughWe need to stop trading future 1sts, it’s been a disaster every time.
I’d rather do Noble and 36 for 13. GC gets Noble and they still get points this year.
Then 13 and Richards for Houston.
We keep our future 1st and Get Houston for the price of Noble, Richards and 36.
Coll: lose Noble, Richards, future first, 37
Gain Houston, 29. ....
I can absolutely empathize with that weird penis with a stick prodding the Collingwood logo saying "do something".